These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32216102)

  • 41. Intermediate outcomes after transcorporal placement of an artificial urinary sphincter.
    Lee D; Zafirakis H; Shapiro A; Westney OL
    Int J Urol; 2012 Sep; 19(9):861-6. PubMed ID: 22571275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Does Use of a Second Cuff Improve Artificial Urinary Sphincter Effectiveness? Evaluation Using a Comparative Cadaver Model.
    Manka MG; Wright EJ
    J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1688-91. PubMed ID: 26165585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Treatment of urinary incontinence with an artificial sphincter: further experience with the AS791/792 device.
    Sidi AA; Sinha B; Gonzalez R
    J Urol; 1984 May; 131(5):891-3. PubMed ID: 6708221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Artificial sphincters: An overview from existing devices to novel technologies.
    Toniolo I; Mascolini MV; Carniel EL; Fontanella CG
    Artif Organs; 2023 Apr; 47(4):617-639. PubMed ID: 36374175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Modification of the use of a magnetic device for urethral occlusion in recurrent incontinence].
    Grüneberger AD
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1991 Oct; 51(10):850-2. PubMed ID: 1761176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Factors determining the outcome following implantation of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter.
    Kil PJ; De Vries JD; Van Kerrebroeck PE; Zwiers W; Debruyne FM
    Br J Urol; 1989 Dec; 64(6):586-9. PubMed ID: 2627633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A novel urethra compression technique using Turkish continence device for male urinary incontinence.
    Odabaş Ö; Gül Sancak I; Kasap Y; Mahmut Z; Ölçücüoğlu E; Taştemur S; Zengin N
    Turk J Med Sci; 2020 Aug; 50(5):1210-1216. PubMed ID: 32151120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Impact of Urethral Risk Factors on Transcorporeal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Erosion Rates and Device Survival.
    Mock S; Dmochowski RR; Brown ET; Reynolds WS; Kaufman MR; Milam DF
    J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1692-6. PubMed ID: 26141851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The long-term results of artificial sphincters in children.
    Bosco PJ; Bauer SB; Colodny AH; Mandell J; Retik AB
    J Urol; 1991 Aug; 146(2):396-9. PubMed ID: 1856939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [An artificial urinary bladder sphincter for men].
    Hanus T; Dvorácek J; Kocvara R
    Rozhl Chir; 1997 Jan; 76(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 9182338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Prosthetic management of urinary incontinence following prostatectomy with special reference to Kaufman's prosthesis].
    Kösters S; Das SP; Raz S; Kaufman JJ
    Z Urol Nephrol; 1977 Aug; 70(8):561-7. PubMed ID: 919802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. An experimental implantable urinary sphincter.
    Swenson O
    Invest Urol; 1976 Sep; 14(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 987028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Male synthetic sling versus artificial urinary sphincter trial for men with urodynamic stress incontinence after prostate surgery (MASTER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Constable L; Cotterill N; Cooper D; Glazener C; Drake MJ; Forrest M; Harding C; Kilonzo M; MacLennan G; McCormack K; McDonald A; Mundy A; Norrie J; Pickard R; Ramsay C; Smith R; Wileman S; Abrams P;
    Trials; 2018 Feb; 19(1):131. PubMed ID: 29467024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The artificial urinary sphincter and male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence: Which patient should get which procedure?
    Comiter CV; Dobberfuhl AD
    Investig Clin Urol; 2016 Jan; 57(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 26966721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Success of the artificial urinary sphincter after failed surgery for incontinence.
    Aliabadi H; Gonzalez R
    J Urol; 1990 May; 143(5):987-90. PubMed ID: 2329618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: impact of prior collagen injection on cost and clinical outcome.
    Gomes CM; Broderick GA; Sánchez-Ortiz RF; Preate D; Rovner ES; Wein AJ
    J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 10604321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The current role of the artificial urinary sphincter for the treatment of urinary incontinence.
    Hussain M; Greenwell TJ; Venn SN; Mundy AR
    J Urol; 2005 Aug; 174(2):418-24. PubMed ID: 16006857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The Ohmmeter Identifies the Site of Fluid Leakage during Artificial Urinary Sphincter Revision Surgery.
    Selph JP; Belsante MJ; Gupta S; Ajay D; Lentz A; Webster G; Le NB; Peterson AC
    J Urol; 2015 Oct; 194(4):1043-8. PubMed ID: 25988517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Artificial urinary sphincters placed after posterior urethral distraction injuries in children are at risk for erosion.
    Ashley RA; Husmann DA
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1813-5. PubMed ID: 17707006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Decline in artificial urinary sphincter survival in modern practice-do we treat a different patient?
    Farag F; van der Doelen M; van Breda J; D'Hauwers K; Heesakkers J
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Jun; 36(5):1350-1355. PubMed ID: 27580297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.