153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3221741)
1. A comparison of disc agar diffusion and agar dilution for the detection of methicillin resistant staphylococci.
Diller DL; Flournoy DJ
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 1988 Nov; 10(11):695-7. PubMed ID: 3221741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: an evaluation of conditions for detection.
Jolly J; Goldberg M
Med Lab Sci; 1989 Jan; 46(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 2779378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of several methods for detection of methicillin resistance in clinical strains of Staphylococcus sp].
Rokosz A; Sawicka-Grzelak A; Meisel-Mikołajczyk F
Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 1997; 49(1-2):19-25. PubMed ID: 9411068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of methods for detecting oxacillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci including cefoxitin disc diffusion.
Palazzo IC; Darini AL
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2006 Apr; 257(2):299-305. PubMed ID: 16553867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of methods used to detect methicillin resistance in staphylococci].
Kuzucu C; Dalgalar M; Durmaz R; Dikerel S
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2002; 36(3-4):253-7. PubMed ID: 12838658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Antibiograms and plasmids of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase negative staphylococci isolated from different clinical sources.
Obi CL; Iyiegbuniwe AE; Olukoya DK; Babalola C; Igumbor EO; Okonta AA
Cent Afr J Med; 1996 Sep; 42(9):258-61. PubMed ID: 8997818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Accuracy of four agar diffusion methods and the Vitek 2 automated system for the detection of the methicillin resistance in coagulase negative staphylococci].
Aïssa N; Stolar D; Legrand P
Pathol Biol (Paris); 2004 Feb; 52(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 14761710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Short communication: Determination of methicillin resistance in staphylococci with different methods and detection of multiple antibiotic resistance].
Cetinkol Y; Altindiş M; Cetinkaya Z; Aktepe OC
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2008 Jan; 42(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 18444569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of susceptibility testing methods with mecA gene analysis for determining oxacillin (methicillin) resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp.
Kohner P; Uhl J; Kolbert C; Persing D; Cockerill F
J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Sep; 37(9):2952-61. PubMed ID: 10449481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the Vitek gram-positive susceptibility 106 card, the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination test, and mecA analysis for detecting oxacillin resistance in a geographically diverse collection of clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci.
Yamazumi T; Furuta I; Diekema DJ; Pfaller MA; Jones RN
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Oct; 39(10):3633-6. PubMed ID: 11574584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of five usual techniques for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus].
Gueudet T; Lemblé C
Pathol Biol (Paris); 2004 Dec; 52(10):617-21. PubMed ID: 15596312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Susceptibility of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant staphylococci to ciprofloxacin].
Namysł E; Piechowicz L; Krzywińska E; Galiński J
Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 1993; 45(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 8309287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methicillin resistance among staphylococci isolated from dogs.
Gortel K; Campbell KL; Kakoma I; Whittem T; Schaeffer DJ; Weisiger RM
Am J Vet Res; 1999 Dec; 60(12):1526-30. PubMed ID: 10622162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two different sensitivity testing agars for detecting methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.
Fahim Q; Ikram A; Abbasi SA; Wiqar MA
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Jul; 18(7):413-7. PubMed ID: 18760064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mupirocin resistance among Iranian isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.
Saderi H; Owlia P; Habibi M
Med Sci Monit; 2008 Oct; 14(10):BR210-3. PubMed ID: 18830185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of cefoxitin 5 and 10 microg discs for the detection of methicillin resistance in staphylococci.
Skov R; Smyth R; Larsen AR; Frimodt-Møller N; Kahlmeter G
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2005 Feb; 55(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 15650006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Short communication: use of cefoxitin disc diffusion method for the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates].
Coban AY; Darka O; Taşdelen Fişgin N; Aksakal Tanyel E; Cetinkaya Sensoy E; Hepsert SA; Birinci A; Durupinar B
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2007 Jan; 41(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 17427559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in staphylococci by disk diffusion induction test.
Chelae S; Laohaprertthisarn V; Phengmak M; Kongmuang U; Kalnauwakul S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jul; 92(7):947-51. PubMed ID: 19626815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of different methods for the detection of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci.
Jarløv JO; Busch-Sørensen C; Espersen F; Mortensen I; Hougaard DM; Rosdahl VT
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1997 Aug; 40(2):241-9. PubMed ID: 9301990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of phenotypic methods in predicting methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) from animals.
Zhang Y; Wang X; LeJeune JT; Zervos M; Bhargava K
Res Vet Sci; 2011 Feb; 90(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 20538309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
