177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32217438)
1. Quantitative evaluation of effects of different cathode materials on performance in Cd(II)-reduced microbial electrolysis cells.
Zhou R; Zhou S; He C
Bioresour Technol; 2020 Jul; 307():123198. PubMed ID: 32217438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cooperative cathode electrode and in situ deposited copper for subsequent enhanced Cd(II) removal and hydrogen evolution in bioelectrochemical systems.
Wang Q; Huang L; Pan Y; Zhou P; Quan X; Logan BE; Chen H
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Jan; 200():565-71. PubMed ID: 26528907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The microbial synergy and response mechanisms of hydrolysis-acidification combined microbial electrolysis cell system with stainless-steel cathode for textile-dyeing wastewater treatment.
Xie J; Zou X; Chang Y; Xie J; Liu H; Cui MH; Zhang TC; Chen C
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 855():158912. PubMed ID: 36162577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Introducing an affordable catalyst for biohydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells.
Ghasemi B; Yaghmaei S; Abdi K; Mardanpour MM; Haddadi SA
J Biosci Bioeng; 2020 Jan; 129(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 31445821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enhancing bioelectrochemical hydrogen production from industrial wastewater using Ni-foam cathodes in a microbial electrolysis cell pilot plant.
Guerrero-Sodric O; Baeza JA; Guisasola A
Water Res; 2024 Jun; 256():121616. PubMed ID: 38657305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Applying the electrode potential slope method as a tool to quantitatively evaluate the performance of individual microbial electrolysis cell components.
Cario BP; Rossi R; Kim KY; Logan BE
Bioresour Technol; 2019 Sep; 287():121418. PubMed ID: 31078815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High surface area stainless steel brushes as cathodes in microbial electrolysis cells.
Call DF; Merrill MD; Logan BE
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Mar; 43(6):2179-83. PubMed ID: 19368232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bioelectrochemical systems with a cathode of stainless-steel electrode for treatment of refractory wastewater: Influence of electrode material on system performance and microbial community.
Xie J; Zou X; Chang Y; Chen C; Ma J; Liu H; Cui MH; Zhang TC
Bioresour Technol; 2021 Dec; 342():125959. PubMed ID: 34852439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Linking internal resistance with design and operation decisions in microbial electrolysis cells.
Miller A; Singh L; Wang L; Liu H
Environ Int; 2019 May; 126():611-618. PubMed ID: 30856448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhanced hydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cell with 3D self-assembly nickel foam-graphene cathode.
Cai W; Liu W; Han J; Wang A
Biosens Bioelectron; 2016 Jun; 80():118-122. PubMed ID: 26807526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of waterproof breathable membrane based cathodes on performance and biofilm microbiomes in bioelectrochemical systems.
Yang Y; Zhuang H; Cui H; Liu B; Xie G; Xing D
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jan; 753():142281. PubMed ID: 33207445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hydrophilic porous materials provide efficient gas-liquid separation to advance hydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells.
Zhao N; Liang D; Li X; Meng S; Liu H
Bioresour Technol; 2021 Oct; 337():125352. PubMed ID: 34098503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High efficiency electrochemical separation of uranium(VI) from uranium-containing wastewater by microbial fuel cells with different cathodes.
Sun D; Lv C; Hua Y; Li M; Zhang X; Fang Q; Cai T; Wu X
Bioelectrochemistry; 2023 Jun; 151():108393. PubMed ID: 36739701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microbial fuel cell cathodes with poly(dimethylsiloxane) diffusion layers constructed around stainless steel mesh current collectors.
Zhang F; Saito T; Cheng S; Hickner MA; Logan BE
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Feb; 44(4):1490-5. PubMed ID: 20099808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. H
Rivera I; Bakonyi P; Buitrón G
Chemosphere; 2017 Mar; 171():379-385. PubMed ID: 28033568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrochemical struvite precipitation from digestate with a fluidized bed cathode microbial electrolysis cell.
Cusick RD; Ullery ML; Dempsey BA; Logan BE
Water Res; 2014 May; 54():297-306. PubMed ID: 24583521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vapor-Fed Cathode Microbial Electrolysis Cells with Closely Spaced Electrodes Enables Greatly Improved Performance.
Rossi R; Baek G; Logan BE
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jan; 56(2):1211-1220. PubMed ID: 34971515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Regenerable Nickel-Functionalized Activated Carbon Cathodes Enhanced by Metal Adsorption to Improve Hydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cells.
Kim KY; Yang W; Logan BE
Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Jun; 52(12):7131-7137. PubMed ID: 29845859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Electrode and Solution Area-Based Resistances Enables Quantitative Comparisons of Factors Impacting Microbial Fuel Cell Performance.
Rossi R; Cario BP; Santoro C; Yang W; Saikaly PE; Logan BE
Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Apr; 53(7):3977-3986. PubMed ID: 30810037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cadmium (II) removal mechanisms in microbial electrolysis cells.
Colantonio N; Kim Y
J Hazard Mater; 2016 Jul; 311():134-41. PubMed ID: 26970043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
