These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32221772)

  • 41. Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio for the Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis: Comparison With Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy.
    Yamanaka F; Shishido K; Ochiai T; Moriyama N; Yamazaki K; Sugitani A; Tani T; Tobita K; Mizuno S; Tanaka Y; Murakami M; Takahashi S; Yamazaki S; Saito S
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(20):2032-2040. PubMed ID: 30154064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Diagnostic Performance of the Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio: Comparison With Fractional Flow Reserve.
    De Rosa S; Polimeni A; Petraco R; Davies JE; Indolfi C
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 11(1):e004613. PubMed ID: 29326150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Impact of diabetes mellitus on the diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve in patients with severe aortic stenosis.
    Dziewierz A; Rzeszutko Ł; Dudek D; Legutko J; Kleczyński P
    Kardiol Pol; 2022; 80(12):1217-1223. PubMed ID: 35979641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Prospective, head-to-head comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, quantitative computed tomography angiography, and intravascular ultrasound for the prediction of hemodynamic significance in intermediate and severe lesions, using fractional flow reserve as reference standard (from the ATLANTA I and II Study).
    Voros S; Rinehart S; Vazquez-Figueroa JG; Kalynych A; Karmpaliotis D; Qian Z; Joshi PH; Anderson H; Murrieta L; Wilmer C; Carlson H; Ballard W; Brown C
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jan; 113(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 24238960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Optical coherence tomography criteria for defining functional severity of intermediate lesions: a comparative study with FFR.
    Pawlowski T; Prati F; Kulawik T; Ficarra E; Bil J; Gil R
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 29(8):1685-91. PubMed ID: 23999603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound for functional assessment of coronary lesions.
    Nishi T; Kitahara H; Fujimoto Y; Nakayama T; Sugimoto K; Takahara M; Kobayashi Y
    J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(1):280-286. PubMed ID: 27293021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Applicability of quantitative flow ratio for rapid evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis: comparison with instantaneous wave-free ratio in clinical practice.
    Watarai M; Otsuka M; Yazaki K; Inagaki Y; Kahata M; Kumagai A; Inoue K; Koganei H; Enta K; Ishii Y
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Nov; 35(11):1963-1969. PubMed ID: 31243612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Relationship of the Duke jeopardy score combined with minimal lumen diameter as assessed by computed tomography angiography to the hemodynamic relevance of coronary artery stenosis.
    Yu M; Zhao Y; Li W; Lu Z; Wei M; Zhou W; Zhang J
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(3):247-254. PubMed ID: 29598929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Physiologic mechanism of discordance between instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve: Insight from
    Lee JM; Hwang D; Park J; Tong Y; Koo BK
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Sep; 243():91-94. PubMed ID: 28600102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Difference in functional assessment of individual stenosis severity in serial coronary lesions between resting and hyperemic pressure-wire pullback: Insights from the GIFT registry.
    Warisawa T; Howard JP; Kawase Y; Tanigaki T; Omori H; Cook CM; Ahmad Y; Francis DP; Akashi YJ; Matsuo H; Davies JE
    Int J Cardiol; 2020 Aug; 312():10-15. PubMed ID: 32376416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Diagnostic accuracy of a novel optical coherence tomography-based fractional flow reserve algorithm for assessment of coronary stenosis significance.
    Pan W; Wei W; Hu Y; Feng L; Ren Y; Li X; Li C; Jiang J; Xiang J; Leng X; Yin D
    Cardiol J; 2024; 31(3):381-389. PubMed ID: 37964647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio for Nonculprit Stenosis in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.
    Choi KH; Lee JM; Kim HK; Kim J; Park J; Hwang D; Rhee TM; Park TK; Yang JH; Song YB; Shin ES; Nam CW; Doh JH; Hahn JY; Choi JH; Choi SH; Koo BK; Gwon HC
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 11(18):1848-1858. PubMed ID: 30236358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Multicenter core laboratory comparison of the instantaneous wave-free ratio and resting Pd/Pa with fractional flow reserve: the RESOLVE study.
    Jeremias A; Maehara A; Généreux P; Asrress KN; Berry C; De Bruyne B; Davies JE; Escaned J; Fearon WF; Gould KL; Johnson NP; Kirtane AJ; Koo BK; Marques KM; Nijjer S; Oldroyd KG; Petraco R; Piek JJ; Pijls NH; Redwood S; Siebes M; Spaan JAE; van 't Veer M; Mintz GS; Stone GW
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Apr; 63(13):1253-1261. PubMed ID: 24211503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Accuracy of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in identifying functionally significant coronary stenosis according to vessel diameter: A meta-analysis of 2,581 patients and 2,807 lesions.
    D'Ascenzo F; Barbero U; Cerrato E; Lipinski MJ; Omedè P; Montefusco A; Taha S; Naganuma T; Reith S; Voros S; Latib A; Gonzalo N; Quadri G; Colombo A; Biondi-Zoccai G; Escaned J; Moretti C; Gaita F
    Am Heart J; 2015 May; 169(5):663-73. PubMed ID: 25965714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Physiological and Clinical Assessment of Resting Physiological Indexes.
    Lee JM; Choi KH; Park J; Hwang D; Rhee TM; Kim J; Park J; Kim HY; Jung HW; Cho YK; Yoon HJ; Song YB; Hahn JY; Nam CW; Shin ES; Doh JH; Hur SH; Koo BK
    Circulation; 2019 Feb; 139(7):889-900. PubMed ID: 30586749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Validation of Resting Diastolic Pressure Ratio Calculated by a Novel Algorithm and Its Correlation With Distal Coronary Artery Pressure to Aortic Pressure, Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio, and Fractional Flow Reserve.
    Ligthart J; Masdjedi K; Witberg K; Mastik F; van Zandvoort L; Lemmert ME; Wilschut J; Diletti R; de Jaegere P; Zijlstra F; Kardys I; Van Mieghem NM; Daemen J
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 11(12):e006911. PubMed ID: 30562091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Diagnostic performance of on-site computed CT-fractional flow reserve based on fluid structure interactions: comparison with invasive fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio.
    Fujimoto S; Kawasaki T; Kumamaru KK; Kawaguchi Y; Dohi T; Okonogi T; Ri K; Yamada S; Takamura K; Kato E; Kato Y; Hiki M; Okazaki S; Aoki S; Mitsouras D; Rybicki FJ; Daida H
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 20(3):343-352. PubMed ID: 30107511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Hemodynamic Insights into Combined Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Assessment Through Quantitative [
    de Winter RW; van Diemen PA; Schumacher SP; Jukema RA; Somsen YBO; Hoek R; van Rossum AC; Twisk JWR; de Waard GA; Nap A; Raijmakers PG; Driessen RS; Knaapen P; Danad I
    J Nucl Med; 2024 Feb; 65(2):279-286. PubMed ID: 38176722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Similarity and Difference of Resting Distal to Aortic Coronary Pressure and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio.
    Lee JM; Park J; Hwang D; Kim CH; Choi KH; Rhee TM; Tong Y; Park JJ; Shin ES; Nam CW; Doh JH; Koo BK
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 70(17):2114-2123. PubMed ID: 29050558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Incremental Value of Subtended Myocardial Mass for Identifying FFR-Verified Ischemia Using Quantitative CT Angiography: Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography and CT-FFR.
    Yang DH; Kang SJ; Koo HJ; Kweon J; Kang JW; Lim TH; Jung J; Kim N; Lee JG; Han S; Ahn JM; Park DW; Lee SW; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ; Mintz GS; Kim YH
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr; 12(4):707-717. PubMed ID: 29361491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.