These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32223060)

  • 21. Assessing the impact of expert knowledge on ICH M7 (Q)SAR predictions. Is expert review still needed?
    Jayasekara PS; Skanchy SK; Kim MT; Kumaran G; Mugabe BE; Woodard LE; Yang J; Zych AJ; Kruhlak NL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Oct; 125():105006. PubMed ID: 34273441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of non-commercial models for genotoxicity and carcinogenicity in the assessment of EFSA's databases.
    Carnesecchi E; Raitano G; Gamba A; Benfenati E; Roncaglioni A
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2020 Jan; 31(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 31766891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The utility of QSARs in predicting acute fish toxicity of pesticide metabolites: A retrospective validation approach.
    Burden N; Maynard SK; Weltje L; Wheeler JR
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Oct; 80():241-6. PubMed ID: 27235557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Integrated in silico and in vitro genotoxicity assessment of thirteen data-poor substances.
    Tran YK; Buick JK; Keir JLA; Williams A; Swartz CD; Recio L; White PA; Lambert IB; Yauk CL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Oct; 107():104427. PubMed ID: 31336127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. (Q)SAR tools for priority setting: A case study with printed paper and board food contact material substances.
    Van Bossuyt M; Van Hoeck E; Raitano G; Manganelli S; Braeken E; Ates G; Vanhaecke T; Van Miert S; Benfenati E; Mertens B; Rogiers V
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2017 Apr; 102():109-119. PubMed ID: 28163056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Classifying micropollutants by environmental risk in groundwater using screening analysis associated to a hybrid multicriteria method combining (Q)SAR tools, fuzzy AHP and ELECTRE.
    Becker RW; Araújo DS; Jachstet LA; Ruiz-Padillo A; do Amaral B; de Souza JE; Müller Athayde CV; Athayde GB; Sirtori C
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Sep; 892():164588. PubMed ID: 37269996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An evaluation of in-house and off-the-shelf in silico models: implications on guidance for mutagenicity assessment.
    Jolly R; Ahmed KB; Zwickl C; Watson I; Gombar V
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Apr; 71(3):388-97. PubMed ID: 25656493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In Silico Approaches in Predictive Genetic Toxicology.
    Sinha M; Dhawan A; Parthasarathi R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2031():351-373. PubMed ID: 31473971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Integration of structure-activity relationship and artificial intelligence systems to improve in silico prediction of ames test mutagenicity.
    Mazzatorta P; Tran LA; Schilter B; Grigorov M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 17238246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. It's difficult, but important, to make negative predictions.
    Williams RV; Amberg A; Brigo A; Coquin L; Giddings A; Glowienke S; Greene N; Jolly R; Kemper R; O'Leary-Steele C; Parenty A; Spirkl HP; Stalford SA; Weiner SK; Wichard J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Apr; 76():79-86. PubMed ID: 26785392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prioritization of mycotoxins based on mutagenicity and carcinogenicity evaluation using combined in silico QSAR methods.
    Lemée P; Fessard V; Habauzit D
    Environ Pollut; 2023 Apr; 323():121284. PubMed ID: 36804886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Principles and procedures for implementation of ICH M7 recommended (Q)SAR analyses.
    Amberg A; Beilke L; Bercu J; Bower D; Brigo A; Cross KP; Custer L; Dobo K; Dowdy E; Ford KA; Glowienke S; Van Gompel J; Harvey J; Hasselgren C; Honma M; Jolly R; Kemper R; Kenyon M; Kruhlak N; Leavitt P; Miller S; Muster W; Nicolette J; Plaper A; Powley M; Quigley DP; Reddy MV; Spirkl HP; Stavitskaya L; Teasdale A; Weiner S; Welch DS; White A; Wichard J; Myatt GJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():13-24. PubMed ID: 26877192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Application of chemometric methods and QSAR models to support pesticide risk assessment starting from ecotoxicological datasets.
    Galimberti F; Moretto A; Papa E
    Water Res; 2020 May; 174():115583. PubMed ID: 32092543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In Silico Prediction of Chemically Induced Mutagenicity: A Weight of Evidence Approach Integrating Information from QSAR Models and Read-Across Predictions.
    Mombelli E; Raitano G; Benfenati E
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2425():149-183. PubMed ID: 35188632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35.
    Benigni R; Bassan A; Pavan M
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2020 Aug; 16(8):651-662. PubMed ID: 32567390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. (Q)SAR assessments of potentially mutagenic impurities: a regulatory perspective on the utility of expert knowledge and data submission.
    Powley MW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Mar; 71(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 25545315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A large comparison of integrated SAR/QSAR models of the Ames test for mutagenicity
    Benfenati E; Golbamaki A; Raitano G; Roncaglioni A; Manganelli S; Lemke F; Norinder U; Lo Piparo E; Honma M; Manganaro A; Gini G
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2018 Aug; 29(8):591-611. PubMed ID: 30052064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Review of the state of science and evaluation of currently available in silico prediction models for reproductive and developmental toxicity: A case study on pesticides.
    Weyrich A; Joel M; Lewin G; Hofmann T; Frericks M
    Birth Defects Res; 2022 Aug; 114(14):812-842. PubMed ID: 35748219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Carbamates and ICH M7 classification: Making use of expert knowledge.
    Hemingway R; Fowkes A; Williams RV
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Jun; 86():392-401. PubMed ID: 28385577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of in silico models for prediction of mutagenicity.
    Bakhtyari NG; Raitano G; Benfenati E; Martin T; Young D
    J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2013; 31(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 23534394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.