These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32223290)

  • 1. Performance feedback promotes proactive but not reactive adaptation of conflict-control.
    Bejjani C; Tan S; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Apr; 46(4):369-387. PubMed ID: 32223290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptation to conflict frequency without contingency and temporal learning: Evidence from the picture-word interference task.
    Spinelli G; Perry JR; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Aug; 45(8):995-1014. PubMed ID: 31144859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Item-specific control of attention in the Stroop task: Contingency learning is not the whole story in the item-specific proportion-congruent effect.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Apr; 48(3):426-435. PubMed ID: 31705394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Working memory load dissociates contingency learning and item-specific proportion-congruent effects.
    Spinelli G; Krishna K; Perry JR; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Nov; 46(11):2007-2033. PubMed ID: 32658541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the learning of stimulus-control associations through incidental memory of reinforcement events.
    Bejjani C; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1599-1621. PubMed ID: 34498904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When working memory meets control in the Stroop effect.
    Entel O; Tzelgov J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(7):1387-1406. PubMed ID: 31697143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Task conflict and proactive control: A computational theory of the Stroop task.
    Kalanthroff E; Davelaar EJ; Henik A; Goldfarb L; Usher M
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Jan; 125(1):59-82. PubMed ID: 29035077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Observation of conflict triggers conflict adaptation.
    Chen Y; Gao W; Li Z; Yan M; Yin S; Hu N; Chen A
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2024 Sep; 78(3):190-202. PubMed ID: 39052346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissociating proactive and reactive control in the Stroop task.
    Gonthier C; Braver TS; Bugg JM
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):778-88. PubMed ID: 26861210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stroop proactive control and task conflict are modulated by concurrent working memory load.
    Kalanthroff E; Avnit A; Henik A; Davelaar EJ; Usher M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):869-75. PubMed ID: 25257710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When stimulus-driven control settings compete: On the dominance of categories as cues for control.
    Bugg JM; Dey A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1905-1932. PubMed ID: 30211592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Context-specific proportion congruent effects: Compound-cue contingency learning in disguise.
    Schmidt JR; Lemercier C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1119-1130. PubMed ID: 29926760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Humans do not avoid reactively implementing cognitive control.
    Bustos B; Colvett JS; Bugg JM; Kool W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Jun; 50(6):587-604. PubMed ID: 38602798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tango of control: The interplay between proactive and reactive control.
    Viviani G; Visalli A; Montefinese M; Vallesi A; Ambrosini E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Jun; 153(6):1644-1670. PubMed ID: 38661633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The face of control: Corrugator supercilii tracks aversive conflict signals in the service of adaptive cognitive control.
    Berger A; Mitschke V; Dignath D; Eder A; van Steenbergen H
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Apr; 57(4):e13524. PubMed ID: 31930536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust evidence for proactive conflict adaptation in the proportion-congruent paradigm.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 May; 49(5):675-700. PubMed ID: 35787140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A spatial version of the Stroop task for examining proactive and reactive control independently from non-conflict processes.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1259-1286. PubMed ID: 38691237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The unique effects of relatively recent conflict on cognitive control.
    Colvett JS; Nobles LM; Bugg JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1344-1367. PubMed ID: 32744839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociation between reaction time and pupil dilation in the Stroop task.
    Hershman R; Henik A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1899-1909. PubMed ID: 30816765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interacting congruency effects in the hybrid Stroop-Simon task prevent conclusions regarding the domain specificity or generality of the congruency sequence effect.
    Weissman DH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 May; 46(5):945-967. PubMed ID: 31580121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.