These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32223327)
1. Toward global standardization of conducting fair investigations of allegations of research misconduct. Nouchi R; Aihara H; Arie F; Asashima M; Daida H; Fudano J; Fujiwara Y; Fushiki S; Geller RJ; Hatano K; Homma T; Kimura M; Kuroki T; Miki K; Morita I; Nitta K; Shinohara A; Siomi MC; Yoshida M; Ichikawa I Account Res; 2020 Aug; 27(6):327-346. PubMed ID: 32223327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complainant issues in research misconduct: the office of research integrity experience. Pascal CB Exp Biol Med (Maywood); 2006 Jul; 231(7):1264-70. PubMed ID: 16816133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Australia needs an office of academic integrity. Hall BM Med J Aust; 2006 Dec 4-18; 185(11-12):619-22. PubMed ID: 17181506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Essential Need for Research Misconduct Allegation Audits. Loikith L; Bauchwitz R Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Aug; 22(4):1027-1049. PubMed ID: 27349911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Responding to allegations of scientific misconduct: the procedure at the French National Medical and Health Research Institute. Breittmayer JP; Bungener M; De The H; Eschwege E; Fougereau M; Guedj G; Kordon C; Philippe O; Postel-Vinay MC; Schaffar-Esterle L; Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 11273435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Wager E; Kleinert S; Maturitas; 2012 Jun; 72(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 22541357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific forensics: how the Office of Research Integrity can assist institutional investigations of research misconduct during oversight review. Dahlberg JE; Davidian NM Sci Eng Ethics; 2010 Dec; 16(4):713-35. PubMed ID: 20526693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientific misconduct and research integrity for the bench scientist. Pascal CB Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 224(4):220-30. PubMed ID: 10964256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Office of Research Integrity: a reflection of disputes and misunderstandings. Scheetz MD Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 10523125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Historical model for editor and Office of Research Integrity cooperation in handling allegations, investigation, and retraction in a contentious (Abbs) case of research misconduct. Price AR; Daroff RB Account Res; 2015; 22(2):63-80. PubMed ID: 25397599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Due process in investigations of research misconduct. Mello MM; Brennan TA N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries. National Committees on Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries. Nylenna M; Andersen D; Dahlquist G; Sarvas M; Aakvaag A Lancet; 1999 Jul; 354(9172):57-61. PubMed ID: 10406378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving biomedical journals' ethical policies: the case of research misconduct. Bosch X J Med Ethics; 2014 Sep; 40(9):644-6. PubMed ID: 24505117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of international guidelines for research ethics: a commentary on "Scientific misconduct: present problems and future trends" (B. Mishkin). Kaiser M Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 11657868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientific misconduct in research. Markey ML J Health Life Sci Law; 2007; 1(1):63, 65-97. PubMed ID: 18610731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the committee on publication ethics (cope). Wager E; Kleinert S Acta Inform Med; 2012 Sep; 20(3):136-40. PubMed ID: 23322968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The United States Government scientific misconduct regulations and the handling of issues related to research integrity. Price AR J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():253-64. PubMed ID: 9857309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Setting standards for scientists. For almost ten years, COMEST has advised UNESCO on the formulation of ethical guidelines. Scholze S EMBO Rep; 2006 Jul; 7 Spec No(Spec No):S65-7. PubMed ID: 16819454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Fraud and misconduct in scientific research: a definition and procedures for investigation. Catano VM; Turk J Med Law; 2007 Sep; 26(3):465-76. PubMed ID: 17970246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]