These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32223702)
1. Electrode estimation in the acoustic region of the human Cochlea. Polak M; Lorens A; Furmanek M; Skarzyński H Acta Otolaryngol; 2020 Jun; 140(6):487-496. PubMed ID: 32223702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical approach for complete cochlear coverage in EAS-patients after residual hearing loss. Weiss NM; Dhanasingh A; Schraven SP; Schulze M; Langner S; Mlynski R PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0223121. PubMed ID: 31557251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing. Boëx C; Baud L; Cosendai G; Sigrist A; Kós MI; Pelizzone M J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 7(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 16450213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cochlear reimplantation after surgery for electric-acoustic stimulation. Helbig S; Helbig M; Rader T; Mack M; Baumann U ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 19571603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation Depending on the Angle of Insertion: Indication for Electric or Electric-Acoustic Stimulation. Helbig S; Adel Y; Leinung M; Stöver T; Baumann U; Weissgerber T Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug; 39(7):834-841. PubMed ID: 29912820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs. Dhanasingh A; Jolly C Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 356():93-103. PubMed ID: 29102129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Two Place-Based Mapping Procedures on Masked Sentence Recognition as a Function of Electrode Array Angular Insertion Depth and Presence of Acoustic Low-Frequency Information: A Simulation Study. Dillon MT; Buss E; Johnson AD; Canfarotta MW; O'Connell BP Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(6):478-487. PubMed ID: 37482054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electric-acoustic stimulation with longer electrodes for potential deterioration in low-frequency hearing. Yoshimura H; Moteki H; Nishio SY; Usami SI Acta Otolaryngol; 2020 Aug; 140(8):632-638. PubMed ID: 32498646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation. Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. EAS-Combined electric and acoustic stimulation. Dhanasingh A; Hochmair I Acta Otolaryngol; 2021 Mar; 141(sup1):22-62. PubMed ID: 33818263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of intracochlear trauma caused by the insertion of a new straight research array. Mukherjee P; Uzun-Coruhlu H; Wong CC; Curthoys IS; Jones AS; Gibson WP Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Aug; 13(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 22333934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CT-scan contouring technique allows for direct and reliable measurements of the cochlear duct length: implication in cochlear implantation with straight electrode-arrays. Vu TH; Perazzini C; Puechmaille M; Bachy A; Mulliez A; Boyer L; Mom T; Gabrillargues J Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Aug; 276(8):2135-2140. PubMed ID: 31011800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Individual Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implantation Using the Concept of Partial Insertion. Lenarz T; Timm ME; Salcher R; Büchner A Otol Neurotol; 2019 Mar; 40(3):e326-e335. PubMed ID: 30741914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Representation of acoustic signals in the human cochlea in presence of a cochlear implant electrode. Kiefer J; Böhnke F; Adunka O; Arnold W Hear Res; 2006 Nov; 221(1-2):36-43. PubMed ID: 16962268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) with the Naída CI Q90 sound processor in experienced cochlear implant users. Battmer RD; Scholz S; Geissler G; Ernst A Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):331-340. PubMed ID: 31464168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term residual hearing in cochlear implanted adult patients who were candidates for electro-acoustic stimulation. Mamelle E; Granger B; Sterkers O; Lahlou G; Ferrary E; Nguyen Y; Mosnier I Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Mar; 277(3):705-713. PubMed ID: 31802226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of hearing preservation for residual hearing with longer cochlear implant electrodes. Moteki H; Nishio SY; Miyagawa M; Tsukada K; Noguchi Y; Usami SI Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Dec; 138(12):1080-1085. PubMed ID: 30702034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrophysiological Evidence of the Basilar-Membrane Travelling Wave and Frequency Place Coding of Sound in Cochlear Implant Recipients. Campbell L; Bester C; Iseli C; Sly D; Dragovic A; Gummer AW; O'Leary S Audiol Neurootol; 2017; 22(3):180-189. PubMed ID: 29084395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects. Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Insertion Depth in Cochlear Implantation and Outcome in Residual Hearing and Vestibular Function. Nordfalk KF; Rasmussen K; Hopp E; Bunne M; Silvola JT; Jablonski GE Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e129-37. PubMed ID: 26524566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]