209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3222488)
1. Reference dose (RfD): description and use in health risk assessments.
Barnes DG; Dourson M
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1988 Dec; 8(4):471-86. PubMed ID: 3222488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of potential risk levels associated with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reference values.
Castorina R; Woodruff TJ
Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Aug; 111(10):1318-25. PubMed ID: 12896853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reference dose (RfD): the possible impact of hormesis.
Barnes DG
J Appl Toxicol; 2000; 20(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 10715610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The limits of regulatory toxicology.
Carrington CD; Bolger PM
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 243(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 20035778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determination of a site-specific reference dose for methylmercury for fish-eating populations.
Shipp AM; Gentry PR; Lawrence G; Van Landingham C; Covington T; Clewell HJ; Gribben K; Crump K
Toxicol Ind Health; 2000 Nov; 16(9-10):335-438. PubMed ID: 11762928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The EPC approach to estimating safety from exposure to environmental chemicals.
Williams CA; Jones HD; Freeman RW; Wernke MJ; Williams PL; Roberts SM; James RC
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1994 Dec; 20(3 Pt 1):259-80. PubMed ID: 7724834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biological effects of low-level exposures: a perspective from U.S. EPA scientists.
Davis JM; Farland WH
Environ Health Perspect; 1998 Feb; 106 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):379-81. PubMed ID: 9539033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The NAS perchlorate review: is the RfD acceptable?
Strawson J; Dourson ML; Zhao QJ
Environ Health Perspect; 2005 Nov; 113(11):A729-30; author reply A730-2. PubMed ID: 16276625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing human health response in life cycle assessment using ED10s and DALYs: part 2--Noncancer effects.
Pennington D; Crettaz P; Tauxe A; Rhomberg L; Brand K; Jolliet O
Risk Anal; 2002 Oct; 22(5):947-63. PubMed ID: 12442991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Human health risk assessment of endosulfan. Part IV: Occupational reentry and public non-dietary exposure and risk.
Beauvais SL; Silva MH; Powell S
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Feb; 56(1):38-50. PubMed ID: 19733201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Basis for a proposed reference dose (RfD) for dioxin of 1-10 pg/kg-day: a weight of evidence evaluation of the human and animal studies.
Greene JF; Hays S; Paustenbach D
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(2):115-59. PubMed ID: 12554432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The NAS perchlorate review: questions remain about the perchlorate RfD.
Ginsberg G; Rice D
Environ Health Perspect; 2005 Sep; 113(9):1117-9. PubMed ID: 16140613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low-level toxicity of chemicals: No acceptable levels?
Lanphear BP
PLoS Biol; 2017 Dec; 15(12):e2003066. PubMed ID: 29257830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Developmental toxicity risk assessment: consensus building, hypothesis formulation, and focused research.
Kimmel CA
Drug Metab Rev; 1996; 28(1-2):85-103. PubMed ID: 8744591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using the EPC approach to develop health-based soil and water screening concentrations for environmental chemicals.
Williams CA; James RC; Freeman RW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1995 Aug; 22(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 7494905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative approaches to human risk assessment for noncancer health effects.
Kimmel CA
Neurotoxicology; 1990; 11(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 2234540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An overview of human exposure modeling activities at the USEPA's National Exposure Research Laboratory.
Furtaw EJ
Toxicol Ind Health; 2001 Jun; 17(5-10):302-14. PubMed ID: 12539877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Approaches to advancing quantitative human health risk assessment of environmental chemicals in the post-genomic era.
Chiu WA; Euling SY; Scott CS; Subramaniam RP
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Sep; 271(3):309-23. PubMed ID: 20353796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety/risk assessment of chemicals compared for different expert groups.
Dourson ML; Lu FC
Biomed Environ Sci; 1995 Mar; 8(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 7605593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's inhalation RfD methodology: risk assessment for air toxics.
Jarabek AM; Menache MG; Overton JH; Dourson ML; Miller FJ
Toxicol Ind Health; 1990 Oct; 6(5):279-301. PubMed ID: 1670284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
