These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32225204)

  • 1. Evaluation method for the optical feedback factor and linewidth enhancement factor using phase discontinuities in self-mixing interferometry signals.
    Ri CY; Kim CS; Ri GC; Kang JC; Pak CM; O JM
    Appl Opt; 2020 Jan; 59(3):687-693. PubMed ID: 32225204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vibration reconstruction and optical feedback parameter evaluation based on the direction discrimination in self-mixing interferometry.
    Ri CY; Choe JH; Ri HR; Pak CM; Ri KR; O JM
    Appl Opt; 2021 May; 60(13):3801-3807. PubMed ID: 33983315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simultaneous measurement of vibration and parameters of a semiconductor laser using self-mixing interferometry.
    Gao Y; Yu Y; Xi J; Guo Q
    Appl Opt; 2014 Jul; 53(19):4256-63. PubMed ID: 25089988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring the feedback parameter of a semiconductor laser with external optical feedback.
    Yu Y; Xi J; Chicharo JF
    Opt Express; 2011 May; 19(10):9582-93. PubMed ID: 21643216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring Linewidth Enhancement Factor by Relaxation Oscillation Frequency in a Laser with Optical Feedback.
    Ruan Y; Liu B; Yu Y; Xi J; Guo Q; Tong J
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Nov; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 30453577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simple method for measuring the linewidth enhancement factor of semiconductor lasers.
    Fan Y; Yu Y; Xi J; Rajan G; Guo Q; Tong J
    Appl Opt; 2015 Dec; 54(34):10295-8. PubMed ID: 26836691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linewidth enhancement factor in semiconductor lasers subject to various external optical feedback conditions.
    Chuang CF; Liao YH; Lin CH; Chen SY; Grillot F; Lin FY
    Opt Express; 2014 Mar; 22(5):5651-8. PubMed ID: 24663906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fringe Detection and Displacement Sensing for Variable Optical Feedback-Based Self-Mixing Interferometry by Using Deep Neural Networks.
    Siddiqui AA; Zabit U; Bernal OD
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring parameters of laser self-mixing interferometry sensor based on back propagation neural network.
    An L; Liu B
    Opt Express; 2022 May; 30(11):19134-19144. PubMed ID: 36221698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving the measurement performance for a self-mixing interferometry-based displacement sensing system.
    Fan Y; Yu Y; Xi J; Chicharo JF
    Appl Opt; 2011 Sep; 50(26):5064-72. PubMed ID: 21946986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Joint estimation of self-mixing interferometry parameters and displacement reconstruction based on local normalization.
    Kim JH; Kim CH; Yun TH; Hong HS; Ho KM; Kim KH
    Appl Opt; 2021 Mar; 60(8):2282-2287. PubMed ID: 33690327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Classification of laser self-mixing interferometric signal under moderate feedback.
    Bernal OD; Zabit U; Bosch T
    Appl Opt; 2014 Feb; 53(4):702-8. PubMed ID: 24514187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic stability analysis for a self-mixing interferometry system.
    Fan Y; Yu Y; Xi J; Guo Q
    Opt Express; 2014 Nov; 22(23):29260-9. PubMed ID: 25402164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detectorless measurements of the operational linewidth of NIR VCSELs by self-mixing interferometry.
    Cardilli MC; Dabbicco M
    Appl Opt; 2016 Nov; 55(31):8946-8950. PubMed ID: 27828300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of external optical feedback on the alpha factor of semiconductor lasers.
    Yu Y; Xi J
    Opt Lett; 2013 Jun; 38(11):1781-3. PubMed ID: 23722742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of feedback optical phase on the relaxation oscillation frequency of a semiconductor laser and its application.
    Liu B; Ruan Y; Yu Y; Wang B; An L
    Opt Express; 2021 Feb; 29(3):3163-3172. PubMed ID: 33770921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Numerical simulations on narrow-linewidth photonic microwave generation based on a QD laser simultaneously subject to optical injection and optical feedback.
    Jiang Z; Wu Z; Yang W; Hu C; Lin X; Jin Y; Dai M; Cui B; Yue D; Xia G
    Appl Opt; 2020 Mar; 59(9):2935-2941. PubMed ID: 32225845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward an Estimation of the Optical Feedback Factor
    Bernal OD; Zabit U; Jayat F; Bosch T
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(10):. PubMed ID: 34069430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determining the linewidth enhancement factor via optical feedback in quantum dot micropillar lasers.
    Holzinger S; Kreinberg S; Hokr BH; Schneider C; Höfling S; Chow WW; Porte X; Reitzenstein S
    Opt Express; 2018 Nov; 26(24):31363-31371. PubMed ID: 30650723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved method for estimation of multiple parameters in self-mixing interferometry.
    Gao Y; Yu Y; Xi J; Guo Q; Tong J; Tong S
    Appl Opt; 2015 Apr; 54(10):2703-9. PubMed ID: 25967179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.