BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32225672)

  • 1. Regularized tomographic PIV for incompressible flows based on conservation of mass.
    Liu N; Ma L
    Appl Opt; 2020 Feb; 59(6):1667-1677. PubMed ID: 32225672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantification of tomographic PIV uncertainty using controlled experimental measurements.
    Liu N; Wu Y; Ma L
    Appl Opt; 2018 Jan; 57(3):420-427. PubMed ID: 29400791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of 4D Flow MRI and Particle Image Velocimetry Using an In Vitro Carotid Bifurcation Model.
    Medero R; Hoffman C; Roldán-Alzate A
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2112-2122. PubMed ID: 30112708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A three-dimensional strain measurement method in elastic transparent materials using tomographic particle image velocimetry.
    Takahashi A; Suzuki S; Aoyama Y; Umezu M; Iwasaki K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184782. PubMed ID: 28910397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-Dimensional Strain Measurements of a Tubular Elastic Model Using Tomographic Particle Image Velocimetry.
    Takahashi A; Zhu X; Aoyama Y; Umezu M; Iwasaki K
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Sep; 9(3):395-404. PubMed ID: 29560585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time-Resolved Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements with Wall Shear Stress and Uncertainty Quantification for the FDA Nozzle Model.
    Raben JS; Hariharan P; Robinson R; Malinauskas R; Vlachos PP
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2016 Mar; 7(1):7-22. PubMed ID: 26628081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 4-D Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry in a Left Ventricular Phantom.
    Voorneveld J; Saaid H; Schinkel C; Radeljic N; Lippe B; Gijsen FJH; van der Steen AFW; de Jong N; Claessens T; Vos HJ; Kenjeres S; Bosch JG
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Mar; 46(3):805-817. PubMed ID: 31924419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performances of motion tracking enhanced Tomo-PIV on turbulent shear flows.
    Novara M; Scarano F
    Exp Fluids; 2012; 52(4):1027-1041. PubMed ID: 25983386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simultaneous Measurement of Turbulence and Particle Kinematics Using Flow Imaging Techniques.
    Hackett EE; Gurka R
    J Vis Exp; 2019 Mar; (145):. PubMed ID: 30933053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of intracranial aneurysm flow quantification techniques: standard PIV vs stereoscopic PIV vs tomographic PIV vs phase-contrast MRI vs CFD.
    Roloff C; Stucht D; Beuing O; Berg P
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2019 Mar; 11(3):275-282. PubMed ID: 30061369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stereoscopic particle image velocimetry in inhomogeneous refractive index fields of combustion flows.
    Vanselow C; Hoppe O; Stöbener D; Fischer A
    Appl Opt; 2021 Oct; 60(28):8716-8727. PubMed ID: 34613097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment and application of wavelet-based optical flow velocimetry (wOFV) to wall-bounded turbulent flows.
    Nicolas A; Zentgraf F; Linne M; Dreizler A; Peterson B
    Exp Fluids; 2023; 64(3):50. PubMed ID: 36844890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional measurement and visualization of internal flow of a moving droplet using confocal micro-PIV.
    Kinoshita H; Kaneda S; Fujii T; Oshima M
    Lab Chip; 2007 Mar; 7(3):338-46. PubMed ID: 17330165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancement of measurement accuracy of X-ray PIV in comparison with the micro-PIV technique.
    Park H; Jung SY; Park JH; Kim JH; Lee SJ
    J Synchrotron Radiat; 2018 Mar; 25(Pt 2):552-559. PubMed ID: 29488936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional multiscale flow structures behind a wall-mounted short cylinder based on tomographic particle image velocimetry and three-dimensional orthogonal wavelet transform.
    Rinoshika H; Rinoshika A; Wang JJ
    Phys Rev E; 2020 Sep; 102(3-1):033101. PubMed ID: 33075884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pressure from 2D snapshot PIV.
    Van der Kindere JW; Laskari A; Ganapathisubramani B; de Kat R
    Exp Fluids; 2019; 60(2):32. PubMed ID: 30880869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flow velocity vector fields by ultrasound particle imaging velocimetry: in vitro comparison with optical flow velocimetry.
    Westerdale J; Belohlavek M; McMahon EM; Jiamsripong P; Heys JJ; Milano M
    J Ultrasound Med; 2011 Feb; 30(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 21266556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Note: development of a compact x-ray particle image velocimetry for measuring opaque flows. II. Three-dimensional velocity field reconstruction.
    Jung SY; Lee SJ
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2012 Apr; 83(4):046102. PubMed ID: 22559588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional, three-vector-component velocimetry of cilia-driven fluid flow using correlation-based approaches in optical coherence tomography.
    Huang BK; Gamm UA; Bhandari V; Khokha MK; Choma MA
    Biomed Opt Express; 2015 Sep; 6(9):3515-38. PubMed ID: 26417520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High dynamic velocity range particle image velocimetry using multiple pulse separation imaging.
    Persoons T; O'Donovan TS
    Sensors (Basel); 2011; 11(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 22346564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.