These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32226224)

  • 1. The English Lexicon Mirrors Functional Brain Activation for a Sensory Hierarchy Dominated by Vision and Audition: Point-Counterpoint.
    Reilly J; Flurie M; Peelle JE
    J Neurolinguistics; 2020 Aug; 55():. PubMed ID: 32226224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dutch sensory modality norms.
    Speed LJ; Brybaert M
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Jun; 54(3):1306-1318. PubMed ID: 34505998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential coding of perception in the world's languages.
    Majid A; Roberts SG; Cilissen L; Emmorey K; Nicodemus B; O'Grady L; Woll B; LeLan B; de Sousa H; Cansler BL; Shayan S; de Vos C; Senft G; Enfield NJ; Razak RA; Fedden S; Tufvesson S; Dingemanse M; Ozturk O; Brown P; Hill C; Le Guen O; Hirtzel V; van Gijn R; Sicoli MA; Levinson SC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Nov; 115(45):11369-11376. PubMed ID: 30397135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Active power and causal flow in Aristotle's theory of vision.
    Baumrin JM
    J Hist Behav Sci; 1976 Jul; 12(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 797703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Italian Sensorimotor Norms: Perception and action strength measures for 959 words.
    Repetto C; Rodella C; Conca F; Santi GC; Catricalà E
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):4035-4047. PubMed ID: 36307624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grounding language in the neglected senses of touch, taste, and smell.
    Speed LJ; Majid A
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2020; 37(5-6):363-392. PubMed ID: 31230566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional MRI of congenital hyposmia: brain activation to odors and imagination of odors and tastes.
    Henkin RI; Levy LM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2002; 26(1):39-61. PubMed ID: 11801904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensory-specific impairment among older people. An investigation using both sensory thresholds and subjective measures across the five senses.
    Cavazzana A; Röhrborn A; Garthus-Niegel S; Larsson M; Hummel T; Croy I
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202969. PubMed ID: 30148857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The language of smell: Connecting linguistic and psychophysical properties of odor descriptors.
    Iatropoulos G; Herman P; Lansner A; Karlgren J; Larsson M; Olofsson JK
    Cognition; 2018 Sep; 178():37-49. PubMed ID: 29763790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Olfactory language and semantic processing in anosmia: a neuropsychological case control study.
    Reilly J; Finley AM; Kelly A; Zuckerman B; Flurie M
    Neurocase; 2021 Feb; 27(1):86-96. PubMed ID: 33400623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vision dominates in perceptual language: English sensory vocabulary is optimized for usage.
    Winter B; Perlman M; Majid A
    Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():213-220. PubMed ID: 29966914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Involuntary polymodal imagery involving olfaction, audition, touch, taste, and vision.
    Dou W; Li Y; Geisler MW; Morsella E
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 Jul; 62():9-20. PubMed ID: 29709666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words.
    Lynott D; Connell L; Brysbaert M; Brand J; Carney J
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Jun; 52(3):1271-1291. PubMed ID: 31832879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human senses and sensors from Aristotle to the present.
    Brandt T; Dieterich M; Huppert D
    Front Neurol; 2024; 15():1404720. PubMed ID: 39022724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Memory for Random Time Patterns in Audition, Touch, and Vision.
    Kang H; Lancelin D; Pressnitzer D
    Neuroscience; 2018 Oct; 389():118-132. PubMed ID: 29577997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-Arbitrariness in Mapping Word Form to Meaning: Cross-Linguistic Formal Markers of Word Concreteness.
    Reilly J; Hung J; Westbury C
    Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41(4):1071-1089. PubMed ID: 26988464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cross-linguistic comparison of perceptual strength norms for Korean, English and L2 English.
    Lee J; Shin JA
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1188909. PubMed ID: 37538997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discriminating speech rhythms in audition, vision, and touch.
    Navarra J; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():197-205. PubMed ID: 25046133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dutch modality exclusivity norms: Simulating perceptual modality in space.
    Speed LJ; Majid A
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Dec; 49(6):2204-2218. PubMed ID: 28155185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cross-modal interactions between audition, touch, and vision in endogenous spatial attention: ERP evidence on preparatory states and sensory modulations.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):254-71. PubMed ID: 11970790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.