These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Prediction of Oral Pharmacokinetics Using a Combination of In Silico Descriptors and In Vitro ADME Properties. Kosugi Y; Hosea N Mol Pharm; 2021 Mar; 18(3):1071-1079. PubMed ID: 33512165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prediction of In Vivo Pharmacokinetic Parameters and Time-Exposure Curves in Rats Using Machine Learning from the Chemical Structure. Obrezanova O; Martinsson A; Whitehead T; Mahmoud S; Bender A; Miljković F; Grabowski P; Irwin B; Oprisiu I; Conduit G; Segall M; Smith GF; Williamson B; Winiwarter S; Greene N Mol Pharm; 2022 May; 19(5):1488-1504. PubMed ID: 35412314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Software Defect Prediction for Healthcare Big Data: An Empirical Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques. Khan B; Naseem R; Shah MA; Wakil K; Khan A; Uddin MI; Mahmoud M J Healthc Eng; 2021; 2021():8899263. PubMed ID: 33815733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Molecular Representations in Machine-Learning-Based Prediction of PK Parameters for Insulin Analogs. Einarson KA; Bendtsen KM; Li K; Thomsen M; Kristensen NR; Winther O; Fulle S; Clemmensen L; Refsgaard HHF ACS Omega; 2023 Jul; 8(26):23566-23578. PubMed ID: 37426277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Retip: Retention Time Prediction for Compound Annotation in Untargeted Metabolomics. Bonini P; Kind T; Tsugawa H; Barupal DK; Fiehn O Anal Chem; 2020 Jun; 92(11):7515-7522. PubMed ID: 32390414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Best of both worlds: combining pharma data and state of the art modeling technology to improve in Silico pKa prediction. Fraczkiewicz R; Lobell M; Göller AH; Krenz U; Schoenneis R; Clark RD; Hillisch A J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Feb; 55(2):389-97. PubMed ID: 25514239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. MABAL: a Novel Deep-Learning Architecture for Machine-Assisted Bone Age Labeling. Mutasa S; Chang PD; Ruzal-Shapiro C; Ayyala R J Digit Imaging; 2018 Aug; 31(4):513-519. PubMed ID: 29404850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. PMLB v1.0: an open-source dataset collection for benchmarking machine learning methods. Romano JD; Le TT; La Cava W; Gregg JT; Goldberg DJ; Chakraborty P; Ray NL; Himmelstein D; Fu W; Moore JH Bioinformatics; 2022 Jan; 38(3):878-880. PubMed ID: 34677586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. CellProfiler Analyst 3.0: accessible data exploration and machine learning for image analysis. Stirling DR; Carpenter AE; Cimini BA Bioinformatics; 2021 Nov; 37(21):3992-3994. PubMed ID: 34478488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Machine-learning scoring functions trained on complexes dissimilar to the test set already outperform classical counterparts on a blind benchmark. Li H; Lu G; Sze KH; Su X; Chan WY; Leung KS Brief Bioinform; 2021 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 34169324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Aliro: an automated machine learning tool leveraging large language models. Choi H; Moran J; Matsumoto N; Hernandez ME; Moore JH Bioinformatics; 2023 Oct; 39(10):. PubMed ID: 37796839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Unified and Standardized Mass Spectrometry Data Processing in Python Using spectrum_utils. Bittremieux W; Levitsky L; Pilz M; Sachsenberg T; Huber F; Wang M; Dorrestein PC J Proteome Res; 2023 Feb; 22(2):625-631. PubMed ID: 36688502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. HDAC3i-Finder: A Machine Learning-based Computational Tool to Screen for HDAC3 Inhibitors. Li S; Ding Y; Chen M; Chen Y; Kirchmair J; Zhu Z; Wu S; Xia J Mol Inform; 2021 Mar; 40(3):e2000105. PubMed ID: 33067876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparative study of statistical and machine learning models on carbon dioxide emissions prediction of China. Li X; Zhang X Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Nov; 30(55):117485-117502. PubMed ID: 37867169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]