These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32227316)
21. Image processing for femoral endosteal anatomy detection: description and testing of a computed tomography based program. Laine HJ; Kontola K; Lehto MU; Pitkänen M; Jarske P; Lindholm TS Phys Med Biol; 1997 Apr; 42(4):673-89. PubMed ID: 9127444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Osteometry of the femora in Turkish individuals: a morphometric study in 114 cadaveric femora as an anatomic basis of femoral component design]. Atilla B; Oznur A; Cağlar O; Tokgözoğlu M; Alpaslan M Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2007; 41(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 17483639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Geometric analysis of the proximal femur in a diverse sample of dogs. Palierne S; Asimus E; Mathon D; Meynaud-Collard P; Autefage A Res Vet Sci; 2006 Jun; 80(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 16169026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Computation of Femoral Canine Morphometric Parameters in Three-Dimensional Geometrical Models. Savio G; Baroni T; Concheri G; Baroni E; Meneghello R; Longo F; Isola M Vet Surg; 2016 Nov; 45(8):987-995. PubMed ID: 27716955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Distal stem design and the torsional stability of cementless femoral stems. Kendrick JB; Noble PC; Tullos HS J Arthroplasty; 1995 Aug; 10(4):463-9. PubMed ID: 8523005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The cortical step sign as a tool for assessing and correcting rotational deformity in femoral shaft fractures. Langer JS; Gardner MJ; Ricci WM J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Feb; 24(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 20101131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The intercondylar fossa indices of male and female dog femora. Kara ME; Sevil Kilimci F; Yildirim IG; Onar V; Pazvant G Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2011; 24(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 21327292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of rotation on the radiographic appearance of the femoral canal. Eckrich SG; Noble PC; Tullos HS J Arthroplasty; 1994 Aug; 9(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 7964774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Computerized morphometric analysis of the femoral diaphyseal canal. Toni A; Fabbri F; Scimeca GB; Zanotti Russo MC; Baruffaldi F; Cianci R; Giunti A Chir Organi Mov; 1995; 80(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 7587522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal anterior femoral flare and torsion. Anatomic bases for metaphyseally fixed short stems design. Sariali E; Knaffo Y Int Orthop; 2017 Oct; 41(10):2017-2023. PubMed ID: 28283706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Morphology of the proximal femur differs widely with age and sex: relevance to design and selection of femoral prostheses. Casper DS; Kim GK; Parvizi J; Freeman TA J Orthop Res; 2012 Jul; 30(7):1162-6. PubMed ID: 22570223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of radiographic and anatomic femoral varus angle measurements in normal dogs. Swiderski JK; Radecki SV; Park RD; Palmer RH Vet Surg; 2008 Jan; 37(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18199056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Three dimensional reconstruction and measurement of the proximal femur in adult developmental dysplasia of the hip]. Liu S; Liu L; Zuo J; Xiao J; Yang Y; Gao Z Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Apr; 54(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 27029200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of femoral canal shape on mechanical stress distribution and adaptive bone remodelling around a cementless tapered-wedge stem. Oba M; Inaba Y; Kobayashi N; Ike H; Tezuka T; Saito T Bone Joint Res; 2016 Sep; 5(9):362-9. PubMed ID: 27601435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Three-dimensional assessment of curvature, torsion, and canal flare index of the humerus of skeletally mature nonchondrodystrophic dogs. Smith EJ; Marcellin-Little DJ; Harrysson OLA; Griffith EH Am J Vet Res; 2017 Oct; 78(10):1140-1149. PubMed ID: 28945134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. How does the relative wall thickness of human femora follow the biomechanical optima? An experimental study on mummies. Evinger S; Suhai B; Bernáth B; Gerics B; Pap I; Horváth G J Exp Biol; 2005 Mar; 208(Pt 5):899-905. PubMed ID: 15755888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Posterior lesser trochanter line should not be used as reference for assessing femoral version in CT scans: a retrospective reliability and agreement study. Worlicek M; Weber M; Craiovan B; Zeman F; Grifka J; Renkawitz T; Wörner M Acta Radiol; 2017 Sep; 58(9):1101-1107. PubMed ID: 28256921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of the geometry of proximal femur for short cephalomedullary nail placement: An observational study in dry femora and living subjects. Pathrot D; Ul Haq R; Aggarwal AN; Nagar M; Bhatt S Indian J Orthop; 2016; 50(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 27293287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biomechanical evaluation of screw-in femoral implant in cementless total hip system. Kim JY; Hayashi K; Garcia TC; Kim SY; Entwistle R; Kapatkin AS; Stover SM Vet Surg; 2012 Jan; 41(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 22092256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The accuracy of computed tomography-based linear measurements of human femora and titanium stem. Feng Z; Ziv I; Rho J Invest Radiol; 1996 Jun; 31(6):333-7. PubMed ID: 8761865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]