255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32228606)
1. The independent indicators for differentiating renal cell carcinoma from renal angiomyolipoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Cao H; Fang L; Chen L; Zhan J; Diao X; Liu Y; Lu C; Zhang Z; Chen Y
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Mar; 20(1):32. PubMed ID: 32228606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differentiating small renal carcinoma and angiomyolipoma.
Chen L; Wang L; Diao X; Qian W; Fang L; Pang Y; Zhan J; Chen Y
Biosci Trends; 2015 Aug; 9(4):252-8. PubMed ID: 26268710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Renal cell carcinoma and renal angiomyolipoma: differential diagnosis with real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
Xu ZF; Xu HX; Xie XY; Liu GJ; Zheng YL; Lu MD
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 May; 29(5):709-17. PubMed ID: 20427782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for small renal masses.
Oh TH; Lee YH; Seo IY
Korean J Urol; 2014 Sep; 55(9):587-92. PubMed ID: 25237460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Diagnosing Small Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes and Angiomyolipoma.
Cao H; Fang L; Chen L; Zhan J; Diao X; Liu Y; Lu C; Zhang Z; Chen Y
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Jun; 41(6):1415-1423. PubMed ID: 34499770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-frame-rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound to differentiate between clear cell renal cell carcinoma and angiomyolipoma.
Wang J; Shi J; Gao L; Hu W; Chen M; Zhang W
BMC Cancer; 2024 May; 24(1):659. PubMed ID: 38816725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT.
Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma: the initial study with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
Lu Q; Wang W; Huang B; Li C; Li C
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1896-901. PubMed ID: 22906749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subjective and objective heterogeneity scores for differentiating small renal masses using contrast-enhanced CT.
Leng S; Takahashi N; Gomez Cardona D; Kitajima K; McCollough B; Li Z; Kawashima A; Leibovich BC; McCollough CH
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 May; 42(5):1485-1492. PubMed ID: 28025654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiation of renal cell carcinoma subtypes and angiomyolipoma.
Li CX; Lu Q; Huang BJ; Xue LY; Yan LX; Zheng FY; Wen JX; Wang WP
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):795-802. PubMed ID: 26971426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound With the Enhancement Pattern and Qualitative Analysis for Differentiating Hypovascular Solid Renal Lesions.
Li J; Huang X; Wang L; Wang X; Li Y; Liu X; Ye N; Yang S; Nie F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2024 Feb; 50(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 37996360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Qualitative and quantitative analysis with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: diagnosis value in hypoechoic renal angiomyolipoma.
Lu Q; Huang BJ; Wang WP; Li CX; Xue LY
Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(2):334-41. PubMed ID: 25741195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings of adult renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion: comparison with clear cell renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma.
Wei S; Tian F; Xia Q; Huang P; Zhang Y; Xia Z; Wu M; Yang B
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Dec; 20(1):1. PubMed ID: 31892340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Triphasic and epithelioid minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma: qualitative and quantitative CEUS characteristics and distinguishing features.
Lu Q; Li CX; Huang BJ; Xue LY; Wang WP
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Feb; 40(2):333-42. PubMed ID: 25139641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Circularity Index on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Helps Distinguish Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma: Retrospective Analyses of Histologically Proven 257 Small Renal Tumors Less Than 4 cm.
Kang HS; Park JJ
Korean J Radiol; 2021 May; 22(5):735-741. PubMed ID: 33660463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are there useful CT features to differentiate renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma?
Yang CW; Shen SH; Chang YH; Chung HJ; Wang JH; Lin AT; Chen KK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1017-28. PubMed ID: 24147472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sonographic Features of Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted MR Images: Differentiating Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK; Cho KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):605-613. PubMed ID: 30040467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation of morphological and enhancement features from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging.
Sung CK; Kim SH; Woo S; Moon MH; Kim SY; Kim SH; Cho JY
Acta Radiol; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1114-22. PubMed ID: 26663389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differentiation of Renal Tumor Histotypes: Usefulness of Quantitative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.
Lu Q; Huang BJ; Xue LY; Fan PL; Wang WP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):W335-42. PubMed ID: 26295670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does Computer-Aided Diagnosis Permit Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat From Renal Cell Carcinoma on MDCT?
Lee Y; Kim JK; Shim W; Sung YS; Cho KS; Shin JH; Kim MH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):W305-12. PubMed ID: 26295666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
