These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32228628)
1. Incidence and influence of prosthesis-patient mismatch after reoperative aortic valve replacement: a retrospective single-center study. Tsubota H; Sakaguchi G; Marui A J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Mar; 15(1):53. PubMed ID: 32228628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reoperative aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians-minimally invasive technique in the era of transcatheter valve replacement. Kaneko T; Loberman D; Gosev I; Rassam F; McGurk S; Leacche M; Cohn L J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):155-62. PubMed ID: 24183906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term follow up of patients undergoing reoperative surgery with aortic or mitral valve replacement using a St. Jude Medical prosthesis. Emery RW; Krogh CC; McAdams S; Emery AM; Holter AR J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 Jul; 19(4):473-84. PubMed ID: 20845896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Imaging for Predicting and Assessing Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement. Pibarot P; Magne J; Leipsic J; Côté N; Blanke P; Thourani VH; Hahn R JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jan; 12(1):149-162. PubMed ID: 30621987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of valve size, predicted effective and indexed effective orifice area after aortic valve replacement. Luthra S; Malvindi PG; Olevano C; Zingale A; Salem H; Ohri SK J Card Surg; 2021 Mar; 36(3):961-968. PubMed ID: 33428257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does a minimally invasive approach increase the incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement? Bakir I; Casselman FP; Onan B; Van Praet F; Vermeulen Y; Degrieck I J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Mar; 23(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 25076545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN™ prosthesis. Van Linden A; Kempfert J; Blumenstein J; Rastan A; Holzhey D; Lehmann S; Mohr FW; Walther T Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Aug; 61(5):414-20. PubMed ID: 22791205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation in degenerated bioprostheses. Seiffert M; Conradi L; Baldus S; Knap M; Schirmer J; Franzen O; Koschyk D; Meinertz T; Reichenspurner H; Treede H J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Mar; 143(3):617-24. PubMed ID: 22169448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of the indexed effective orifice area on mid-term cardiac-related mortality after aortic valve replacement. Bleiziffer S; Ali A; Hettich IM; Akdere D; Laubender RP; Ruzicka D; Boehm J; Lange R; Eichinger W Heart; 2010 Jun; 96(11):865-71. PubMed ID: 20406767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on the regression of secondary mitral regurgitation after isolated aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic valve in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Angeloni E; Melina G; Pibarot P; Benedetto U; Refice S; Ciavarella GM; Roscitano A; Sinatra R; Pepper JR Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jan; 5(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22138006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term evaluation of biological versus mechanical prosthesis use at reoperative aortic valve replacement. Chan V; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry P; Masters R; Mesana TG; Ruel M J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Jul; 144(1):146-51. PubMed ID: 21962842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prevalence and Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Pure Aortic Regurgitation. Auffret V; Voisine P; Cinq-Mars A; Charbonneau É; Le Ven F; Dubois-Sénéchal SM; Brenna E; Dagenais F; Dubois M; Ridard C; Sénéchal M J Heart Valve Dis; 2016 Sep; 25(5):543-551. PubMed ID: 28238235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis in East China. Guo L; Zheng J; Chen L; Li R; Ma L; Ni Y; Zhao H J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 May; 12(1):42. PubMed ID: 28545592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Severe prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: Analysis of risk factors for early and long-term mortality. Mannacio V; Mannacio L; Mango E; Antignano A; Mottola M; Caparrotti S; Musumeci F; Vosa C J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(1):333-339. PubMed ID: 27492659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contemporary Outcomes of Repeat Aortic Valve Replacement: A Benchmark for Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Procedures. Kaneko T; Vassileva CM; Englum B; Kim S; Yammine M; Brennan M; Suri RM; Thourani VH; Jacobs JP; Aranki S Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Oct; 100(4):1298-304; discussion 1304. PubMed ID: 26209480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Aortic valve prosthesis-patient mismatch and long-term outcomes: 19-year single-center experience. Tully PJ; Aty W; Rice GD; Bennetts JS; Knight JL; Baker RA Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 96(3):844-50. PubMed ID: 23810177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical Enlargement of the Aortic Root Does Not Increase the Operative Risk of Aortic Valve Replacement. Rocha RV; Manlhiot C; Feindel CM; Yau TM; Mueller B; David TE; Ouzounian M Circulation; 2018 Apr; 137(15):1585-1594. PubMed ID: 29167226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incremental Prognostic Use of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain in Asymptomatic/Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Severe Bioprosthetic Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Redo Aortic Valve Replacement. Naji P; Shah S; Svensson LG; Gillinov AM; Johnston DR; Rodriguez LL; Grimm RA; Griffin BP; Desai MY Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 28559420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]