191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32229116)
21. [Colonization of the teat skin and the teat canal of lactating dairy cattle by mastitis pathogens].
Paduch JH; Krömker V
Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere; 2011; 39(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 22138767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Communications of Staphylococcus aureus and non-aureus Staphylococcus species from bovine intramammary infections and teat apex colonization.
Mahmmod YS; Klaas IC; Svennesen L; Pedersen K; Ingmer H
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Aug; 101(8):7322-7333. PubMed ID: 29778469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of simulated quarter and udder teat cup removal settings on strip milk and milking duration in dairy cows.
Silva Boloña P; Upton J; Reinemann DJ
J Dairy Sci; 2020 May; 103(5):4446-4454. PubMed ID: 32113765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of enhanced hygiene on transmission of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Streptococcus dysgalactiae in dairy herds with automatic milking systems.
Skarbye AP; Krogh MA; Denwood M; Bjerring M; Østergaard S
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jun; 104(6):7195-7209. PubMed ID: 33714586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Staphylococcus aureus colonization of teat skin as affected by postmilking teat treatment when exposed to cold and windy conditions.
Fox LK; Norell RJ
J Dairy Sci; 1994 Aug; 77(8):2281-8. PubMed ID: 7962850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Type of teat cup liner and cluster ventilation affect vacuum conditions in the liner and milking performance in dairy cows.
Holst GE; Adrion F; Umstätter C; Bruckmaier RM
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Apr; 104(4):4775-4786. PubMed ID: 33612232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of cleaning duration and water temperature on oxytocin release and milk removal in an automatic milking system.
Dzidic A; Macuhova J; Bruckmaier RM
J Dairy Sci; 2004 Dec; 87(12):4163-9. PubMed ID: 15545378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Visual detection of technical success and effectiveness of teat cleaning in two automatic milking systems.
Hovinen M; Aisla AM; Pyörälä S
J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3354-62. PubMed ID: 16107426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Influence of milking technique, milking hygiene and environmental hygiene parameters on the microbial contamination of milking machines].
Feldmann M; Zimmermann A; Hoedemaker M
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2006 Jul; 113(7):274-81. PubMed ID: 16892707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Efficacy of two hydrogen peroxide teat disinfectants against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae.
Leslie KE; Vernooy E; Bashiri A; Dingwell RT
J Dairy Sci; 2006 Sep; 89(9):3696-701. PubMed ID: 16899706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The importance of hygienic procedures in controlling mastitis.
Bushnell RB
Vet Clin North Am Large Anim Pract; 1984 Jul; 6(2):361-70. PubMed ID: 6474758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of carryover and presampling procedures on the results of real-time PCR used for diagnosis of bovine intramammary infections with Streptococcus agalactiae at routine milk recordings.
Mahmmod YS; Mweu MM; Nielsen SS; Katholm J; Klaas IC
Prev Vet Med; 2014 Mar; 113(4):512-21. PubMed ID: 24467998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of qPCR and bacterial culture for the diagnosis of bovine intramammary infections and teat skin colonisation with Streptococcus agalactiae and Staphylococcus aureus using Bayesian analysis.
Svennesen L; Mahmmod YS; Skjølstrup NK; Mathiasen LR; Katholm J; Pedersen K; Klaas IC; Nielsen SS
Prev Vet Med; 2018 Dec; 161():69-74. PubMed ID: 30466660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Efficacy of a new premilking teat disinfectant containing a phenolic combination for the prevention of mastitis.
Oliver SP; Gillespie BE; Lewis MJ; Ivey SJ; Almeida RA; Luther DA; Johnson DL; Lamar KC; Moorehead HD; Dowlen HH
J Dairy Sci; 2001 Jun; 84(6):1545-9. PubMed ID: 11417715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of vacuum fluctuation during milking on the development of intramammary infection from teat duct colonization by Staphylococcus aureus.
King JS; Neave FK; Williams RL
J Dairy Res; 1979 Nov; 46(4):607-11. PubMed ID: 536476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mathematical modeling to estimate efficacy of postmilking teat disinfection in split-udder trials of dairy cows.
Lam TJ; DeJong MC; Schukken YH; Brand A
J Dairy Sci; 1996 Jan; 79(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 8675783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Removal of hair surrounding the teat and associated bacterial counts on teat skin surface, in milk, and intramammary infections.
Silk AS; Fox LK; Hancock DD
J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health; 2003 Nov; 50(9):447-50. PubMed ID: 14633199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Premilking teat disinfection: is it worthwhile in pasture-grazed dairy herds?
Morton JM; Penry JF; Malmo J; Mein GA
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Dec; 97(12):7525-37. PubMed ID: 25282424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Intermediate Cluster Disinfection: Which Disinfection Solution Is Most Effective on Milking Liners? A Comparison of Microorganism Reduction on Liner Inner Surfaces Using Quantitative Swab Sampling Technique.
Scheib S; Leimbach S; Avramidis G; Bellmann M; Nitz J; Ochs C; Tellen A; Wente N; Zhang Y; Viöl W; Krömker V
Pathogens; 2023 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 37111446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of a gel teat cleaning and sanitizing compound for premilking hygiene.
Ingawa KH; Adkinson RW; Gough RH
J Dairy Sci; 1992 May; 75(5):1224-32. PubMed ID: 1597577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
