BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32229268)

  • 1. Prognostic Value of Gleason Score at Positive Surgical Margin in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Lysenko I; Mori K; Mostafaei H; Enikeev DV; Karakiewicz PI; Briganti A; Quhal F; Janisch F; Shariat SF
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2020 Oct; 18(5):e517-e522. PubMed ID: 32229268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Primary Gleason grade and Gleason grade group at positive surgical margins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    John A; John H; Catterwell R; Selth LA; Callaghan MO
    BJU Int; 2021 May; 127 Suppl 1():13-22. PubMed ID: 33973331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does Gleason score of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy affect biochemical recurrence and oncological outcomes? Protocol for systematic review.
    John A; O'Callaghan M; Catterwell R; Selth L
    BMJ Open; 2020 Mar; 10(3):e034612. PubMed ID: 32209629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on oncologic outcomes in patients with nonorgan-confined prostate cancer.
    Preisser F; Heinze A; S Abrams-Pompe R; Budäus L; Chun FK; Graefen M; Huland H; Tilki D
    Prostate; 2022 Jun; 82(9):949-956. PubMed ID: 35344221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
    Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Chapin BF; Nguyen JN; Achim MF; Navai N; Williams SB; Prokhorova IN; Wang X; Tapia EMLN; Davis JW; Troncoso P
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Jun; 21(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 29230008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of the extent and location of positive surgical margins on the risk of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancers.
    Matti B; Reeves F; Prouse M; Zargar-Shoshtari K
    Prostate; 2021 Dec; 81(16):1428-1434. PubMed ID: 34570379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy.
    Evren I; Hacıislamoğlu A; Ekşi M; Yavuzsan AH; Baytekin F; Çolakoğlu Y; Canoğlu D; Tugcu V
    Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 30325603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Positive surgical margin is associated with biochemical recurrence risk following radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis from high-quality retrospective cohort studies.
    Zhang L; Wu B; Zha Z; Zhao H; Jiang Y; Yuan J
    World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 16(1):124. PubMed ID: 29970100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Comprehensive Analysis of the Association Between Gleason Score at a Positive Surgical Margin and the Risk of Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Iremashvili V; Pelaez L; Jorda M; Parekh DJ; Punnen S
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2019 Mar; 43(3):369-373. PubMed ID: 30557174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Similar Recurrence Rate Between Gleason Score of Six at Positive Margin and Negative Margin After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Kano H; Kadono Y; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Iijima M; Kawaguchi S; Nohara T; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Ikeda H; Mizokami A
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Jan; 41(1):509-516. PubMed ID: 33419850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre.
    Sachdeva A; Veeratterapillay R; Voysey A; Kelly K; Johnson MI; Aning J; Soomro NA
    BMC Urol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):91. PubMed ID: 28969608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Focal nodular enhancement on DCE MRI of the prostatectomy bed: radiologic-pathologic correlations and prognostic value.
    Park MY; Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Apr; 33(4):2985-2994. PubMed ID: 36350389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of positive surgical margin location and perineural invasion on biochemical recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Lian Z; Zhang H; He Z; Ma S; Wang X; Liu R
    World J Surg Oncol; 2020 Aug; 18(1):201. PubMed ID: 32791998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prostatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Controlled for Tumor Grade, Stage, and Margin Status Does Not Independently Influence the Likelihood of Biochemical Recurrence in Localized Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Kryvenko ON; Iakymenko OA; De Lima Guido LP; Bhattu AS; Merhe A; Mouzannar A; Briski LM; Oymagil I; Lugo I; Nemov I; Ritch CR; Kava BR; Punnen S; Jorda M; Parekh DJ; Gonzalgo ML
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Aug; 146(8):1012-1017. PubMed ID: 34739539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence in patients with pT3aN0/Nx prostate cancer with positive surgical margins: a multicenter study from the Prostate Cancer Research Committee.
    Song W; Lee DH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Lee HM; Choi HY; Kim JW; Lee S; Byun SS; Jeong CW; Kwak C; Cho JS; Ahn H; Jeon SS
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Nov; 143(11):2393-2400. PubMed ID: 28823006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with the addition of detailed pathology of the positive surgical margin and cribriform growth.
    Remmers S; Hollemans E; Nieboer D; Luiting HB; van Leenders GJLH; Helleman J; Roobol MJ
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2022 Feb; 56():151842. PubMed ID: 34717190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.