223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32230824)
1. Comparative Genomics of
Zhang Q; Zhang L; Ross P; Zhao J; Zhang H; Chen W
Genes (Basel); 2020 Mar; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 32230824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative genomics of human Lactobacillus crispatus isolates reveals genes for glycosylation and glycogen degradation: implications for in vivo dominance of the vaginal microbiota.
van der Veer C; Hertzberger RY; Bruisten SM; Tytgat HLP; Swanenburg J; de Kat Angelino-Bart A; Schuren F; Molenaar D; Reid G; de Vries H; Kort R
Microbiome; 2019 Mar; 7(1):49. PubMed ID: 30925932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genomic Comparisons of Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus iners Reveal Potential Ecological Drivers of Community Composition in the Vagina.
France MT; Mendes-Soares H; Forney LJ
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Dec; 82(24):7063-7073. PubMed ID: 27694231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The core genome evolution of Lactobacillus crispatus as a driving force for niche competition in the human vaginal tract.
Tarracchini C; Argentini C; Alessandri G; Lugli GA; Mancabelli L; Fontana F; Anzalone R; Viappiani A; Turroni F; Ventura M; Milani C
Microb Biotechnol; 2023 Sep; 16(9):1774-1789. PubMed ID: 37491806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Insight into phenotypic and genotypic differences between vaginal
Costantini PE; Firrincieli A; Fedi S; Parolin C; Viti C; Cappelletti M; Vitali B
Microb Genom; 2021 Jun; 7(6):. PubMed ID: 34096840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative genomics of Lactobacillus crispatus suggests novel mechanisms for the competitive exclusion of Gardnerella vaginalis.
Ojala T; Kankainen M; Castro J; Cerca N; Edelman S; Westerlund-Wikström B; Paulin L; Holm L; Auvinen P
BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15():1070. PubMed ID: 25480015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative genomics of canine Lactobacillus reuteri reveals adaptation to a shared environment with humans.
Son S; Oh JD; Lee SH; Shin D; Kim Y
Genes Genomics; 2020 Sep; 42(9):1107-1116. PubMed ID: 32761525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative Genomics Analysis of
Wang S; Yang B; Ross RP; Stanton C; Zhao J; Zhang H; Chen W
Genes (Basel); 2020 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 31936280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Modulatory Activities of Lactobacillus crispatus Strains in the Context of the Vaginal Microbiota.
Argentini C; Fontana F; Alessandri G; Lugli GA; Mancabelli L; Ossiprandi MC; van Sinderen D; Ventura M; Milani C; Turroni F
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Apr; 10(2):e0273321. PubMed ID: 35266820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interstrain Variability of Human Vaginal
Puebla-Barragan S; Watson E; van der Veer C; Chmiel JA; Carr C; Burton JP; Sumarah M; Kort R; Reid G
Molecules; 2021 Jul; 26(15):. PubMed ID: 34361691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative genomics of Lactobacillus salivarius strains focusing on their host adaptation.
Lee JY; Han GG; Kim EB; Choi YJ
Microbiol Res; 2017 Dec; 205():48-58. PubMed ID: 28942844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification of a high-molecular-mass Lactobacillus epithelium adhesin (LEA) of Lactobacillus crispatus ST1 that binds to stratified squamous epithelium.
Edelman SM; Lehti TA; Kainulainen V; Antikainen J; Kylväjä R; Baumann M; Westerlund-Wikström B; Korhonen TK
Microbiology (Reading); 2012 Jul; 158(Pt 7):1713-1722. PubMed ID: 22516222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Properties of Epithelial Cells and Vaginal Secretions in Pregnant Women When Lactobacillus crispatus or Lactobacillus iners Dominate the Vaginal Microbiome.
Leizer J; Nasioudis D; Forney LJ; Schneider GM; Gliniewicz K; Boester A; Witkin SS
Reprod Sci; 2018 Jun; 25(6):854-860. PubMed ID: 28301987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative genome analyses of
Mancabelli L; Mancino W; Lugli GA; Milani C; Viappiani A; Anzalone R; Longhi G; van Sinderen D; Ventura M; Turroni F
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2021 Apr; 87(8):. PubMed ID: 33579685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative functional genomics of Lactobacillus spp. reveals possible mechanisms for specialization of vaginal lactobacilli to their environment.
Mendes-Soares H; Suzuki H; Hickey RJ; Forney LJ
J Bacteriol; 2014 Apr; 196(7):1458-70. PubMed ID: 24488312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative Genomic Study of Lactobacillus jensenii and the Newly Defined Lactobacillus mulieris Species Identifies Species-Specific Functionality.
Putonti C; Shapiro JW; Ene A; Tsibere O; Wolfe AJ
mSphere; 2020 Aug; 5(4):. PubMed ID: 32817455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mining genome traits that determine the different gut colonization potential of
Xiao Y; Zhao J; Zhang H; Zhai Q; Chen W
Microb Genom; 2021 Jun; 7(6):. PubMed ID: 34100697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Study of helveticin gene in Lactobacillus crispatus strains and evaluation of its use as a phylogenetic marker.
Stoyancheva G
Arch Microbiol; 2020 Jan; 202(1):205-208. PubMed ID: 31388693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Host and body site-specific adaptation of
Pan M; Hidalgo-Cantabrana C; Barrangou R
NAR Genom Bioinform; 2020 Mar; 2(1):lqaa001. PubMed ID: 33575551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative genomics of the gut commensal Bifidobacterium bifidum reveals adaptation to carbohydrate utilization.
Abdelhamid AG; El-Dougdoug NK
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2021 Apr; 547():155-161. PubMed ID: 33610915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
