These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32232736)

  • 1. Order effects in two-alternative forced-choice tasks invalidate adaptive threshold estimates.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Oct; 52(5):2168-2187. PubMed ID: 32232736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold.
    Kontsevich LL; Tyler CW
    Vision Res; 1999 Aug; 39(16):2729-37. PubMed ID: 10492833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical performance of optimal Bayesian adaptive estimation.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Span J Psychol; 2009 May; 12(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 19476214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interval bias in 2AFC detection tasks: sorting out the artifacts.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2332-52. PubMed ID: 21735314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary.
    Klein SA
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1421-55. PubMed ID: 11800466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Denoising forced-choice detection data.
    García-Pérez MA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):75-100. PubMed ID: 19422731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of optimal data placement for psychometric function estimation: a computer simulation.
    Lam CF; Dubno JR; Mills JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):1969-76. PubMed ID: 10530021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Threshold estimation in two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) tasks: the Spearman-Kärber method.
    Ulrich R; Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Apr; 66(3):517-33. PubMed ID: 15283075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Indecision Model of Psychophysical Performance in Dual-Presentation Tasks: Parameter Estimation and Comparative Analysis of Response Formats.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1142. PubMed ID: 28747893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus selection in adaptive psychophysical procedures.
    Green DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jun; 87(6):2662-74. PubMed ID: 2373801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptive threshold estimation with unforced-choice tasks.
    Kaernbach C
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1377-88. PubMed ID: 11800463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Do's and Don'ts of Psychophysical Methods for Interpretability of Psychometric Functions and Their Descriptors.
    García-Pérez MÁ; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Span J Psychol; 2019 Dec; 22():E56. PubMed ID: 31868158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reminder and 2AFC tasks provide similar estimates of the difference limen: a reanalysis of data from Lapid, Ulrich, and Rammsayer (2008) and a discussion of Ulrich and Vorberg (2009).
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1155-78. PubMed ID: 20436208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naïve observers.
    Jäkel F; Wichmann FA
    J Vis; 2006 Nov; 6(11):1307-22. PubMed ID: 17209737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determining thresholds using adaptive procedures and psychometric fits: evaluating efficiency using theory, simulations, and human experiments.
    Karmali F; Chaudhuri SE; Yi Y; Merfeld DM
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):773-89. PubMed ID: 26645306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using 10AFC to further improve the efficiency of the quick CSF method.
    Hou F; Lesmes L; Bex P; Dorr M; Lu ZL
    J Vis; 2015; 15(9):2. PubMed ID: 26161631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian adaptive estimation of threshold versus contrast external noise functions: the quick TvC method.
    Lesmes LA; Jeon ST; Lu ZL; Dosher BA
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(19):3160-76. PubMed ID: 16782167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive psychophysical procedures and imbalance in the psychometric function.
    Saberi K; Green DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jul; 100(1):528-36. PubMed ID: 8675846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DLs in reminder and 2AFC tasks: data and models.
    Ulrich R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1179-98. PubMed ID: 20436209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Algorithm for improving psychophysical threshold estimates by detecting sustained inattention in experiments using PEST.
    Rinderknecht MD; Ranzani R; Popp WL; Lambercy O; Gassert R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1629-1645. PubMed ID: 29748784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.