These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32233676)

  • 1. The effect of low-temperature thermal processing on the quality of chicken breast fillets.
    Karpińska-Tymoszczyk M; Draszanowska A; Danowska-Oziewicz M; Kurp L
    Food Sci Technol Int; 2020 Oct; 26(7):563-573. PubMed ID: 32233676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of different sous-vide cooking temperature-time combinations on the functional and sensory properties of goose meat.
    Wereńska M
    Poult Sci; 2024 Jun; 103(6):103701. PubMed ID: 38603934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comprehensive study of sous-vide cooked Korat chicken breast processed by various conditions: texture, compositional/structural changes, and consumer acceptance.
    Pongsetkul J; Saengsuk N; Siriwong S; Thumanu K; Yongsawatdigul J; Benjakul S
    Poult Sci; 2024 Apr; 103(4):103495. PubMed ID: 38354473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of ultrasound and pulsed electric field combinations on the cooking Losses, texture Profile, and Taste-Related amino acids of chicken breast meat.
    Roobab U; Chen BR; Madni GM; Tong ZG; Zeng XA; Abdi G; Hussain S; Aadil RM
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2024 Jul; 107():106919. PubMed ID: 38795569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of
    Yang L; Li Z; Xie T; Feng J; Xu X; Zhao Y; Gao X
    Molecules; 2023 Dec; 28(24):. PubMed ID: 38138565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of spaghetti meat abnormality on broiler chicken breast meat composition and technological quality.
    Tasoniero G; Zhuang H; Gamble GR; Bowker BC
    Poult Sci; 2020 Mar; 99(3):1724-1733. PubMed ID: 32111334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study on the effects of sous-vide, microwave cooking, and stewing on functional properties and sensory quality of goose meat.
    Wereńska M
    Poult Sci; 2023 Nov; 102(11):103064. PubMed ID: 37722278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Influence of the Sous Vide Cooking Time on Selected Characteristics of Pork Lion.
    Rezler R; Krzywdzińska-Bartkowiak M; Piątek M
    Molecules; 2023 Aug; 28(16):. PubMed ID: 37630352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Various Cooking Methods on Technological and Sensory Quality of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar).
    Głuchowski A; Czarniecka-Skubina E; Wasiak-Zys G; Nowak AD
    Foods; 2019 Aug; 8(8):. PubMed ID: 31394833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The technical potential of a sous-vide processing method for developing high-moisture textured soy protein.
    Woo Choi H; Choi M; Hahn J; Jin Choi Y
    Food Chem; 2024 Jan; 430():136978. PubMed ID: 37507242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of the cooking method (grilling, roasting, frying and sous-vide) on the oxidation of thiols, tryptophan, alkaline amino acids and protein cross-linking in jerky chicken.
    Silva FA; Ferreira VC; Madruga MS; Estévez M
    J Food Sci Technol; 2016 Aug; 53(8):3137-3146. PubMed ID: 27784908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prevalence of pale, soft, and exudative (PSE) condition in chicken meat used for commercial meat processing and its effect on roasted chicken breast.
    Karunanayaka DS; Jayasena DD; Jo C
    J Anim Sci Technol; 2016; 58():27. PubMed ID: 27458523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancing chicken breast meat quality through ultrasonication: Physicochemical, palatability, and amino acid profiles.
    Roobab U; Chen BR; Madni GM; Guo SM; Zeng XA; Abdi G; Aadil RM
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2024 Mar; 104():106824. PubMed ID: 38412679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of different atmospheric and subatmospheric cooking techniques on physical and chemical qualitative properties of pork loin.
    Sut S; Lacey K; Dhenge R; Ferrarese I; Santi S; Cacchioli A; Gazza F; Dall'Acqua S; Rinaldi M
    Meat Sci; 2023 Dec; 206():109338. PubMed ID: 37783025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of Spectroscopic Techniques for a Rapid and Non-Destructive Monitoring of Thermal Treatments and Storage Time of Sous-Vide Cooked Cod Fillets.
    Hassoun A; Cropotova J; Rustad T; Heia K; Lindberg SK; Nilsen H
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32340297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of thermal processing and temperature on the quality, protein oxidation, and structural characteristics of yak meat.
    Zhang Y; Li S; Zhao L
    J Texture Stud; 2023 Oct; 54(5):659-670. PubMed ID: 37408518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality changes of chicken meat jerky with different sweeteners during storage.
    Wongwiwat P; Wattanachant S
    J Food Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 52(12):8329-35. PubMed ID: 26604411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic alterations in protein, sensory, chemical, and oxidative properties occurring in meat during thermal and non-thermal processing techniques: A comprehensive review.
    Khalid W; Maggiolino A; Kour J; Arshad MS; Aslam N; Afzal MF; Meghwar P; Zafar KU; De Palo P; Korma SA
    Front Nutr; 2022; 9():1057457. PubMed ID: 36712529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low-Field NMR Analysis of Chicken Patties Prepared with Woody Breast Meat and Implications to Meat Quality.
    Sun X; You J; Dong Y; Xu L; Maynard CJ; Owens CM
    Foods; 2021 Oct; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 34681548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effects of Processing and Preservation Technologies on Meat Quality: Sensory and Nutritional Aspects.
    Gómez I; Janardhanan R; Ibañez FC; Beriain MJ
    Foods; 2020 Oct; 9(10):. PubMed ID: 33036478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.