These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32233886)

  • 1. Principles of tactile search over the body.
    Halfen EJ; Magnotti JF; Rahman MS; Yau JM
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 May; 123(5):1955-1968. PubMed ID: 32233886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contextual cueing: implicit memory of tactile context facilitates tactile search.
    Assumpção L; Shi Z; Zang X; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1212-22. PubMed ID: 25737258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crossmodal learning of target-context associations: When would tactile context predict visual search?
    Chen S; Shi Z; Zang X; Zhu X; Assumpção L; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1682-1694. PubMed ID: 31845105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contextual cueing of tactile search is coded in an anatomical reference frame.
    Assumpção L; Shi Z; Zang X; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Apr; 44(4):566-577. PubMed ID: 29035073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrophysiological correlates of attentional selection in tactile search tasks: The impact of singleton distractors on target selection.
    Mena CI; Lang K; Gherri E
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Sep; 57(9):e13592. PubMed ID: 32412112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vision of the body and the differentiation of perceived body side in touch.
    Tamè L; Farnè A; Pavani F
    Cortex; 2013 May; 49(5):1340-51. PubMed ID: 22531552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The attentive homunculus: ERP evidence for somatotopic allocation of attention in tactile search.
    Forster B; Tziraki M; Jones A
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Apr; 84():158-66. PubMed ID: 26898371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When vision influences the invisible distractor: tactile response compatibility effects require vision.
    Wesslein AK; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):763-74. PubMed ID: 24245501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Somatosensory interactions reveal feature-dependent computations.
    Rahman MS; Yau JM
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Jul; 122(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 30969894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Viewing the body modulates neural mechanisms underlying sustained spatial attention in touch.
    Sambo CF; Gillmeister H; Forster B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 30(1):143-50. PubMed ID: 19519638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-modal attention modulates tactile subitizing but not tactile numerosity estimation.
    Tian Y; Chen L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1229-1239. PubMed ID: 29549663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mutual influences of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion and auditory motion with uncrossed and crossed arms.
    Jiang Y; Chen L
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):19-51. PubMed ID: 23713198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial coding of touch at the fingers: Insights from double simultaneous stimulation within and between hands.
    Tamè L; Farnè A; Pavani F
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Jan; 487(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 20933059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reciprocal Interactions Between Audition and Touch in Flutter Frequency Perception.
    Convento S; Wegner-Clemens KA; Yau JM
    Multisens Res; 2019 Jan; 32(1):67-85. PubMed ID: 31059492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. No Evidence for a Role of Spatially Modulated α-Band Activity in Tactile Remapping and Short-Latency, Overt Orienting Behavior.
    Ossandón JP; König P; Heed T
    J Neurosci; 2020 Nov; 40(47):9088-9102. PubMed ID: 33087476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When visual distractors predict tactile search: The temporal profile of cross-modal spatial learning.
    Chen S; Shi Z; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Sep; 47(9):1453-1470. PubMed ID: 33464111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.
    Marini F; Romano D; Maravita A
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):873-887. PubMed ID: 27913817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive flexibility of the within-hand attentional gradient in touch: An MEG study.
    Kida T; Tanaka E; Kakigi R
    Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():373-384. PubMed ID: 29936309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual differences in anticipatory mu rhythm modulation are associated with executive function and processing speed.
    Meredith Weiss S; Laconi RN; Marshall PJ
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2020 Oct; 20(5):901-916. PubMed ID: 32794102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of perceptual load on tactile spatial attention: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Gherri E; Berreby F
    Brain Res; 2017 Oct; 1673():42-51. PubMed ID: 28803830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.