These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32234935)

  • 1. Short-term Outcomes Following Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Technically Demanding Rectal Cancer.
    Numata M; Kazama K; Onodera A; Hara K; Atsumi Y; Okamoto H; Aoyama T; Tamagawa H; Godai T; Saeki H; Yukawa N; Shiozawa M; Rino Y; Masuda M
    Anticancer Res; 2020 Apr; 40(4):2337-2342. PubMed ID: 32234935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center.
    Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Tomioka H; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y
    Surg Today; 2016 Aug; 46(8):957-62. PubMed ID: 26482845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comparative Study of Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer.
    Levic K; Donatsky AM; Bulut O; Rosenberg J
    Surg Innov; 2015 Aug; 22(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 25377216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Creatine kinase elevation after robotic surgery for rectal cancer due to a prolonged lithotomy position.
    Tsuchiya Y; Munakata S; Tsukamoto R; Okazawa Y; Mizukoshi K; Sugimoto K; Takahashi M; Tomiki YKY; Sakamoto K
    BMC Surg; 2020 Jun; 20(1):136. PubMed ID: 32546155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: results of a single high-volume center in Japan.
    Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y; Furuatni A; Manabe S; Yamaoka Y; Hino H
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1755-1762. PubMed ID: 30191369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.
    Yamanashi T; Miura H; Tanaka T; Watanabe A; Goto T; Yokoi K; Kojo K; Niihara M; Hosoda K; Kaizu T; Yamashita K; Sato T; Kumamoto Y; Hiki N; Naitoh T
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Oct; 15(4):753-764. PubMed ID: 35555973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for lower rectal cancer: the impact of visceral obesity on surgical outcomes.
    Shiomi A; Kinugasa Y; Yamaguchi T; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2016 Oct; 31(10):1701-10. PubMed ID: 27599703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Yamanashi T; Miura H; Tanaka T; Watanabe A; Yokoi K; Kojo K; Niihara M; Yamashita K; Sato T; Kumamoto Y; Hiki N; Naitoh T
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Jun; 17(3):959-969. PubMed ID: 36413257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Risk factors of anastomotic leakage after robotic surgery for low and mid rectal cancer].
    Chen JW; Chang WJ; Zhang ZY; He GD; Feng QY; Zhu DX; Yi T; Lin Q; Wei Y; Xu JM
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):364-369. PubMed ID: 32306604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer.
    Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Tomioka H; Kagawa H
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Feb; 30(2):721-728. PubMed ID: 26092002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal surgery in obese and morbidly obese patients: ACS-NSQIP analysis.
    Albayati S; Hitos K; Berney CR; Morgan MJ; Pathma-Nathan N; El-Khoury T; Richardson A; Chu DI; Cannon J; Kennedy G; Toh JWT
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Apr; 17(2):637-643. PubMed ID: 36269488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intra-operative double-stapled colorectal or coloanal anastomotic complications of laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: double-stapled anastomotic complication could result in persistent anastomotic leakage.
    Kim JH; Kim HY; Lee IK; Oh ST; Kim JG; Lee YS
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Nov; 29(11):3117-24. PubMed ID: 25519426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conversion is a risk factor for postoperative anastomotic leak in rectal cancer patients - A retrospective cohort study.
    Liu XH; Wu XR; Zhou C; Zheng XB; Ke J; Liu HS; Hu T; Chen YF; He XW; He XS; Chen YL; Zou YF; Wang JP; Wu XJ; Lan P
    Int J Surg; 2018 May; 53():298-303. PubMed ID: 29367043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery with the double stapling technique for stage 0/I rectal carcinoma: a subgroup analysis of a multicenter, single-arm phase II trial.
    Tanaka K; Okuda J; Yamamoto S; Ito M; Sakamoto K; Kokuba Y; Yoshimura K; Watanabe M
    Surg Today; 2017 Oct; 47(10):1215-1222. PubMed ID: 28280982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nomogram to predict anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer.
    Yao HH; Shao F; Huang Q; Wu Y; Qiang Zhu Z; Liang W
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2014; 61(133):1257-61. PubMed ID: 25436293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and the effect of learning curve.
    Huang YM; Huang YJ; Wei PL
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Oct; 96(40):e8171. PubMed ID: 28984767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between robotic, laparoscopic, and open rectal cancer surgery: early experience at a tertiary care center.
    Ramji KM; Cleghorn MC; Josse JM; MacNeill A; O'Brien C; Urbach D; Quereshy FA
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1337-43. PubMed ID: 26173546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Risk factor analysis on anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer patient with neoadjuvant therapy and establishment of a nomogram prediction model].
    Jiang W; Feng MY; Dong XY; Dong SM; Zheng JX; Liu XM; Liu WJ; Yan J
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 22(8):748-754. PubMed ID: 31422613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Different clinical features according to the anastomotic leakage subtypes after rectal cancer surgeries: contained vs. free leakages.
    Park EJ; Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208572. PubMed ID: 30540826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.