260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32236102)
1. Over a century of cancer research: Inconvenient truths and promising leads.
Sonnenschein C; Soto AM
PLoS Biol; 2020 Apr; 18(4):e3000670. PubMed ID: 32236102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Cancer and the elusive cancer genes].
Sonnenschein C; Soto AM
Med Sci (Paris); 2014; 30(6-7):688-92. PubMed ID: 25014463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cancer Metastases: So Close and So Far.
Sonnenschein C; Soto AM
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Nov; 107(11):. PubMed ID: 26283653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A cancer theory kerfuffle can lead to new lines of research.
Baker SG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Feb; 107(2):. PubMed ID: 25528755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SMT and TOFT Integrable After All: A Reply to Bizzarri and Cucina.
Bedessem B; Ruphy S
Acta Biotheor; 2017 Mar; 65(1):81-85. PubMed ID: 27535677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. SMT or TOFT? How the two main theories of carcinogenesis are made (artificially) incompatible.
Bedessem B; Ruphy S
Acta Biotheor; 2015 Sep; 63(3):257-67. PubMed ID: 25851566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Integrative Approach Toward Biology, Organisms, and Cancer.
Sonnenschein C; Soto AM
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1702():15-26. PubMed ID: 29119499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SMT and TOFT: Why and How They are Opposite and Incompatible Paradigms.
Bizzarri M; Cucina A
Acta Biotheor; 2016 Sep; 64(3):221-39. PubMed ID: 27283400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chaos and cancers. Theories concerning carcinogenesis.
Kwasniewski W; Stupak A; Kotarski J; Gozdzicak-Jozefiak A
Ginekol Pol; 2021; 92(4):318-321. PubMed ID: 33757157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The cancer puzzle: Welcome to organicism.
Soto AM; Sonnenschein C
Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2021 Oct; 165():114-119. PubMed ID: 34271028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The tissue organization field theory of cancer: a testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory.
Soto AM; Sonnenschein C
Bioessays; 2011 May; 33(5):332-40. PubMed ID: 21503935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Carcinogenesis explained within the context of a theory of organisms.
Sonnenschein C; Soto AM
Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2016 Oct; 122(1):70-76. PubMed ID: 27498170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are the somatic mutation and tissue organization field theories of carcinogenesis incompatible?
Rosenfeld S
Cancer Inform; 2013; 12():221-9. PubMed ID: 24324325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The aging of the 2000 and 2011 Hallmarks of Cancer reviews: a critique.
Sonnenschein C; Soto AM
J Biosci; 2013 Sep; 38(3):651-63. PubMed ID: 23938395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Somatic mutation theory of carcinogenesis: why it should be dropped and replaced.
Sonnenschein C; Soto AM
Mol Carcinog; 2000 Dec; 29(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 11170258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Theories of carcinogenesis: an emerging perspective.
Sonnenschein C; Soto AM
Semin Cancer Biol; 2008 Oct; 18(5):372-7. PubMed ID: 18472276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New hypotheses for cancer generation and progression.
Mazzocca A; Fais S
Med Hypotheses; 2021 Jul; 152():110614. PubMed ID: 34087614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Emergentism as a default: cancer as a problem of tissue organization.
Soto AM; Sonnenschein C
J Biosci; 2005 Feb; 30(1):103-18. PubMed ID: 15824446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The somatic mutation theory of cancer: growing problems with the paradigm?
Soto AM; Sonnenschein C
Bioessays; 2004 Oct; 26(10):1097-107. PubMed ID: 15382143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tumor and the microenvironment: a chance to reframe the paradigm of carcinogenesis?
Bizzarri M; Cucina A
Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():934038. PubMed ID: 25013812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
