157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32236743)
21. ASO Author Reflections: Time to Treatment: A New Quality Metric in Breast Cancer Care?
Pratt D; Grobmyer SR
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Dec; 28(13):8609. PubMed ID: 34050427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. ASO Author Reflections: Demonstrating the Benefits of Oncology Navigation.
Enomoto LM; Shen P
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Dec; 26(Suppl 3):840-841. PubMed ID: 31659637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [The German Guideline Clearinghouse on Breast Cancer: the need for frequent updating of breast cancer guidelines requires effective guideline updating procedures].
Weingart O; Sonntag D; Trapp H; Bartsch HH; Baumeister RG; Goerke K; Giersiepen K; Hindenburg HJ; Ming K; Schulz-Wendtland R; Störkel S; Kober T; Thole H; Kirchner H; Ollenschläger G;
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2004 Aug; 98(5):403-11. PubMed ID: 15487388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A review of breast conservation in Columbia/HCA healthcare facilities.
Stanfill PH; Weber D
J Oncol Manag; 1998; 7(5):19-23. PubMed ID: 10187173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Quality of adjuvant CMF chemotherapy for node-positive primary breast cancer: a population-based study.
Schaapveld M; de Vries EG; van der Graaf WT; Otter R; Willemse PH
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2004 Oct; 130(10):581-90. PubMed ID: 15258754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Electronic Clinical Decision Tools for Improving Adherence to Colon Cancer Surveillance Guidelines: Can the Chips Finally Fall Into Place?
Peter S
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2018 Nov; 16(11):1406-1408. PubMed ID: 30442739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Using practice guidelines to assess cancer care quality.
Bach PB
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9041-3. PubMed ID: 16301594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A Better Pathway? Building Consensus and Engaging Providers with Feedback to Improve and Standardize Cancer Care.
Colonna S; Sweetenham J; Burgon TB; Buys SS; Lynch R; Au T; Johnson E; Kubal T; Paculdo D; Acelajado MC; Peabody JW
Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Apr; 19(2):e376-e384. PubMed ID: 30711440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A process for measuring the quality of cancer care: the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative.
Neuss MN; Desch CE; McNiff KK; Eisenberg PD; Gesme DH; Jacobson JO; Jahanzeb M; Padberg JJ; Rainey JM; Guo JJ; Simone JV
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Sep; 23(25):6233-9. PubMed ID: 16087948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. ASO Author Reflections: Oncologic Outcome of Endoscopic-Assisted Breast Surgery Compared with the Conventional Approach in Breast Cancers.
Lai HW
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Nov; 28(12):7381-7382. PubMed ID: 33907922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Development and implementation of a medical oncology quality improvement tool for a regional community oncology network: the Fox Chase Cancer Center Partners initiative.
O'Grady MA; Gitelson E; Swaby RF; Goldstein LJ; Sein E; Keeley P; Miller B; Li T; Weinstein A; Cohen SJ
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2007 Oct; 5(9):875-82. PubMed ID: 17977500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. ASO Author Reflections: Improving Efficiency of Care for Young Women with Breast Cancer.
Cordeiro E; Guay E; Roberts A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 29(4):2261. PubMed ID: 34981247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A roadmap to improve care of patients with breast cancer in India.
Looze N
Natl Med J India; 2012; 25(3):172-4. PubMed ID: 22963300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Evaluation of oncology clinical practice guidelines: the contribution of certified centers].
Wesselmann S
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 26474651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reporting of quality measures in gynecologic oncology programs at Prospective Payment System (PPS)-Exempt Cancer Hospitals: an early glimpse into a challenging initiative.
Cohn DE; Leitao M; Levenback C; Berkowitz R; Roman L; Lucci J; Kim S; Lancaster J; Odunsi K; Wakabayashi M; Goff BA
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Sep; 130(3):403-6. PubMed ID: 23718934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Regional Variation in Performance for Commission on Cancer Breast Quality Measures and Impact on Overall Survival.
Kantor O; Wang CH; Yao K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 25(10):3069-3075. PubMed ID: 29956092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quality of care in breast cancer centers: results of benchmarking by the German Cancer Society and German Society for Breast Diseases.
Kowalski C; Ferencz J; Brucker SY; Kreienberg R; Wesselmann S
Breast; 2015 Apr; 24(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 25515645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. ASO Author Reflections: The Difficult Assessment of the Hard-Won Progress of Breast Cancer Care.
Ponzone R
Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 27(Suppl 3):777-778. PubMed ID: 32514807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. ASO Author Reflections: Extending Optimal Care for Breast Cancer to the Elderly Population.
Thalji SZ; Cortina CS; Kong AL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Oct; 30(11):6471-6472. PubMed ID: 37368097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Gynecologic oncology quality measures: what really matters?
Chalas E
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Sep; 130(3):401-2. PubMed ID: 23953769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
