These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32236991)

  • 1. Genomic selection strategies to improve maternal traits in Norwegian White Sheep.
    Lillehammer M; Sonesson AK; Klemetsdal G; Blichfeldt T; Meuwissen THE
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2020 Jul; 137(4):384-394. PubMed ID: 32236991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genomic selection for two traits in a maternal pig breeding scheme.
    Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3079-87. PubMed ID: 23658351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic selection for maternal traits in pigs.
    Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Dec; 89(12):3908-16. PubMed ID: 21841086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Potential benefits of genomic selection on genetic gain of small ruminant breeding programs.
    Shumbusho F; Raoul J; Astruc JM; Palhiere I; Elsen JM
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3644-57. PubMed ID: 23736059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mating structures for genomic selection breeding programs in aquaculture.
    Sonesson AK; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):46. PubMed ID: 27342705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mating strategies with genomic information reduce rates of inbreeding in animal breeding schemes without compromising genetic gain.
    Liu H; Henryon M; Sørensen AC
    Animal; 2017 Apr; 11(4):547-555. PubMed ID: 27531662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic evaluation of genomic selection in small ruminants: a sheep meat breeding program.
    Shumbusho F; Raoul J; Astruc JM; Palhiere I; Lemarié S; Fugeray-Scarbel A; Elsen JM
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1033-41. PubMed ID: 26446712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic prediction of reproduction traits for Merino sheep.
    Bolormaa S; Brown DJ; Swan AA; van der Werf JHJ; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
    Anim Genet; 2017 Jun; 48(3):338-348. PubMed ID: 28211150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increased genetic gains in sheep, beef and dairy breeding programs from using female reproductive technologies combined with optimal contribution selection and genomic breeding values.
    Granleese T; Clark SA; Swan AA; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):70. PubMed ID: 26370143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing genetic gain, inbreeding, and bias attributable to different flock genetic means in alternative sheep sire referencing schemes.
    Kuehn LA; Notter DR; Lewis RM
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(3):526-35. PubMed ID: 18073281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimizing female allocation to reproductive technologies considering merit, inbreeding and cost in nucleus breeding programmes with genomic selection.
    Granleese T; Clark SA; Kinghorn BP; van der Werf JHJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Mar; 136(2):79-90. PubMed ID: 30585664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benefits of testing in both bio-secure and production environments in genomic selection breeding programs for commercial broiler chicken.
    Chu TT; Alemu SW; Norberg E; Sørensen AC; Henshall J; Hawken R; Jensen J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Nov; 50(1):52. PubMed ID: 30390619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Most of the benefits from genomic selection can be realized by genotyping a small proportion of available selection candidates.
    Henryon M; Berg P; Ostersen T; Nielsen B; Sørensen AC
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):4681-9. PubMed ID: 23087087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Broiler breeding strategies using indirect carcass measurements.
    Zerehdaran S; Vereijken AL; van Arendonk JA; Bovenhuis H; van der Waaij EH
    Poult Sci; 2005 Aug; 84(8):1214-21. PubMed ID: 16156205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Moving Beyond Managing Realized Genomic Relationship in Long-Term Genomic Selection.
    De Beukelaer H; Badke Y; Fack V; De Meyer G
    Genetics; 2017 Jun; 206(2):1127-1138. PubMed ID: 28381589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection.
    Pryce JE; Goddard ME; Raadsma HW; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5455-66. PubMed ID: 20965361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of field data in pig genomic selection schemes: a simulation study.
    Lillehammer M; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1025-32. PubMed ID: 26627382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pedigree relationships to control inbreeding in optimum-contribution selection realise more genetic gain than genomic relationships.
    Henryon M; Liu H; Berg P; Su G; Nielsen HM; Gebregiwergis GT; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Jul; 51(1):39. PubMed ID: 31286868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.