150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32237001)
1. The Effects of Distribution of Image Matched Fiducial Markers on Accuracy of Computer-Guided Implant Surgery.
Choi YD; Mai HN; Mai HY; Ha JH; Li LJ; Lee DH
J Prosthodont; 2020 Jun; 29(5):409-414. PubMed ID: 32237001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the Accuracy of Image Registration Methods for Merging Optical Scan and Radiographic Data in Edentulous Jaws.
Woo HW; Mai HN; Lee DH
J Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 29(8):707-711. PubMed ID: 32557969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Matching Point Selections on Image Registration Accuracy between Optical Scan and Computed Tomography.
Mai HY; Lee DH
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():3285431. PubMed ID: 32802841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of the number and distribution of fiducial markers on the accuracy of robot-guided implant surgery in edentulous mandibular arches: An in vitro study.
Zhao Y; Liao Y; Wu X; Zhang Y; Shi B; Yan Q
J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104529. PubMed ID: 37105431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In-vitro assessment of a registration protocol for image guided implant dentistry.
Birkfellner W; Solar P; Gahleitner A; Huber K; Kainberger F; Kettenbach J; Homolka P; Diemling M; Watzek G; Bergmann H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Feb; 12(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 11168273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Accuracy of Intraoral Registration for Dynamic Surgical Navigation in the Edentulous Maxilla.
Al-Jarsha MY; Almezyad O; AlOtaibi N; Naudi KB; Robertson DP; Ayoub AF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Jun; (3):21-46. PubMed ID: 38350113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of the configurations of fiducial markers on accuracy of surgical navigation in zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study.
Fan S; Hung K; Bornstein MM; Huang W; Wang F; Wu Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):85–90. PubMed ID: 30521651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the 3D Augmented Reality-Guided Intraoperative Positioning of Dental Implants in Edentulous Mandibular Models.
Jiang W; Ma L; Zhang B; Fan Y; Qu X; Zhang X; Liao H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1219-1228. PubMed ID: 30427952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An oral and maxillofacial navigation system for implant placement with automatic identification of fiducial points.
Qin C; Cao Z; Fan S; Wu Y; Sun Y; Politis C; Wang C; Chen X
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(2):281-289. PubMed ID: 30317436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of length and location of edentulous area on the accuracy of prosthetic treatment plan incorporation into cone-beam computed tomography scans.
Jamjoom FZ; Kim DG; Lee DJ; McGlumphy EA; Yilmaz B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 20(3):300-307. PubMed ID: 29399999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Dental Surface Image Registration and Fiducial Marker Registration: An In Vivo Accuracy Study of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
Han YT; Lin WC; Fan FY; Chen CL; Lin CC; Cheng HC
J Clin Med; 2021 Sep; 10(18):. PubMed ID: 34575295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-assisted surgery in the edentulous jaw based on 3 fixed intraoral reference points.
Widmann G; Keiler M; Zangerl A; Stoffner R; Longato S; Bale R; Puelacher W
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1140-7. PubMed ID: 20156663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impacts of Thresholds of Gray Value for Cone-Beam Computed Tomography 3D Reconstruction on the Accuracy of Image Matching with Optical Scan.
Park SW; Yoon RG; Lee H; Lee HJ; Choi YD; Lee DH
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(17):. PubMed ID: 32882986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Registration of CT to 3D ultrasound using near-field fiducial localization: A feasibility study.
Kingma R; Rohling RN; Nguan C
Comput Aided Surg; 2011; 16(2):54-70. PubMed ID: 21322745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated fiducial marker detection and fiducial point localization in CT images for lung biopsy image-guided surgery systems.
Bao N; Li A; Zhao W; Cui Z; Tian X; Yue Y; Li H; Qian W
J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(3):417-429. PubMed ID: 30958321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of a Novel Trace-Registration Method for Dynamic Navigation Surgery.
Stefanelli LV; Mandelaris GA; DeGroot BS; Gambarini G; De Angelis F; Di Carlo S
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2020; 40(3):427-435. PubMed ID: 32233198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new markerless patient-to-image registration method using a portable 3D scanner.
Fan Y; Jiang D; Wang M; Song Z
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101910. PubMed ID: 25281962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intensity-based 2D-3D spine image registration incorporating a single fiducial marker.
Russakoff DB; Rohlfing T; Adler JR; Maurer CR
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jan; 12(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 15691724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Registration using 3D-printed rigid templates outperforms manually scanned surface matching in image-guided temporal bone surgery.
Yamashita M; Matsumoto N; Cho B; Komune N; Onogi S; Lee J; Bano J; Akahoshi T; Hashizume M
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Nov; 11(11):2119-2127. PubMed ID: 27299347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
