These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3223765)

  • 1. Test of the validity of the Poisson assumption for analysis of most-probable-number results.
    Haas CN; Heller B
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1988 Dec; 54(12):2996-3002. PubMed ID: 3223765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of a new most-probable-number (MPN) dilution plate method for the enumeration of Escherichia coli in water samples.
    Kodaka H; Saito M; Matsuoka H
    Biocontrol Sci; 2009 Sep; 14(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 19785286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of microbial densities from dilution count experiments.
    Haas CN
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1989 Aug; 55(8):1934-42. PubMed ID: 2782873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling the relationship between most probable number (MPN) and colony-forming unit (CFU) estimates of fecal coliform concentration.
    Gronewold AD; Wolpert RL
    Water Res; 2008 Jul; 42(13):3327-34. PubMed ID: 18490046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. False positive fecal coliform in biosolid samples assayed using A-1 medium.
    Baker KH; Redmond B; Herson DS
    Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(4):423-4. PubMed ID: 16121511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Membrane filtration differentiation of E. coli from coliforms in the examination of water.
    Mates A; Shaffer M
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1989 Sep; 67(3):343-6. PubMed ID: 2693426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the methods for enumerating coliform bacteria from water samples using precise reference standards.
    Wohlsen T; Bates J; Vesey G; Robinson WA; Katouli M
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 42(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 16599987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison study of membrane filtration direct count and an automated coliform and Escherichia coli detection system for on-site water quality testing.
    Habash M; Johns R
    J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Oct; 79(1):128-30. PubMed ID: 19703500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Monitoring microbiological safety of small systems of water distribution. Comparison of two sampling programs in a town in central Italy].
    Papini P; Faustini A; Manganello R; Borzacchi G; Spera D; Perucci CA
    Epidemiol Prev; 2005; 29(5-6):259-63. PubMed ID: 16669162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of sample preparation procedures for enumerating fecal coliforms in coarse southwestern U.S. bottom sediments by the most-probable-number method.
    Doyle JD; Tunnicliff B; Kramer RE; Brickler SK
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1984 Oct; 48(4):881-3. PubMed ID: 6391380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bacteriological analysis of a pond water from Gobardanga, West Bengal.
    Tarafdar B; Bhattacharyya RN
    J Environ Biol; 2002 Jul; 23(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 12597570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Total coliform detection in drinking water: comparison of membrane filtration with Colilert and Coliquik.
    Olson BH; Clark DL; Milner BB; Stewart MH; Wolfe RL
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1991 May; 57(5):1535-9. PubMed ID: 1854206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Coliform species recovered from untreated surface water and drinking water by the membrane filter, standard, and modified most-probable-number techniques.
    Evans TM; LeChevallier MW; Waarvick CE; Seidler RJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1981 Mar; 41(3):657-63. PubMed ID: 7013706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of methods for determining the numbers and species distribution of coliform bacteria in well water samples.
    Niemi RM; Heikkilä MP; Lahti K; Kalso S; Niemelä SI
    J Appl Microbiol; 2001 Jun; 90(6):850-8. PubMed ID: 11412314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the Autoanalysis Colilert test for detection and enumeration of total coliforms.
    Covert TC; Shadix LC; Rice EW; Haines JR; Freyberg RW
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1989 Oct; 55(10):2443-7. PubMed ID: 2513773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection and enumeration of coliforms in drinking water: current methods and emerging approaches.
    Rompré A; Servais P; Baudart J; de-Roubin MR; Laurent P
    J Microbiol Methods; 2002 Mar; 49(1):31-54. PubMed ID: 11777581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency distribution of coliforms in water distribution systems.
    Christian RR; Pipes WO
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1983 Feb; 45(2):603-9. PubMed ID: 6830219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bacterial water quality in the personal water bottles of elementary students.
    Oliphant JA; Ryan MC; Chu A
    Can J Public Health; 2002; 93(5):366-7. PubMed ID: 12353459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparative studies of fresh and seawater for the determination of total coliform and fecal coliform bacteria according to the European Economic Community guideline 76/160 (bathing water) by the use of the most-probable-number method with BRILA-MUG broth and differentiation according to the drinking water ordinance].
    Havemeister G; Aleksic S; Bockemühl J; Heinemeyer EA; Müller HE; Von Pritzbuer E
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1991 May; 191(5-6):523-38. PubMed ID: 1883475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal determination of most probable numbers.
    Best DJ
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1990 Oct; 11(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 2261317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.