These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32239415)

  • 1. Grey water footprint evaluation and driving force analysis of eight economic regions in China.
    Cui S; Dong H; Wilson J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jun; 27(16):20380-20391. PubMed ID: 32239415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variation and internal-external driving forces of grey water footprint efficiency in China's Yellow River Basin.
    Li Y; Liu Y; Yang L; Fu T
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0283199. PubMed ID: 36947510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial-temporal evolution and driving factors of grey water footprint efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt.
    Xu C; Liu Y; Fu T
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Oct; 844():156930. PubMed ID: 35753457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. China's provincial grey water footprint characteristic and driving forces.
    Zhang L; Dong H; Geng Y; Francisco MJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Aug; 677():427-435. PubMed ID: 31059885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial-temporal variation and driving factors decomposition of agricultural grey water footprint in China.
    Kong Y; He W; Zhang Z; Shen J; Yuan L; Gao X; An M; Ramsey TS
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Sep; 318():115601. PubMed ID: 35949098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mapping multiple water pollutants across China using the grey water footprint.
    Feng H; Sun F; Liu Y; Zeng P; Deng L; Che Y
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Sep; 785():147255. PubMed ID: 33933768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement and driving factors of grey water footprint efficiency in Yangtze River Basin.
    Fu T; Xu C; Yang L; Hou S; Xia Q
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jan; 802():149587. PubMed ID: 34454151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. China's industrial gray water footprint assessment and implications for investment in industrial wastewater treatment.
    Huang Y; Zhou B; Han R; Lu X; Li S; Li N
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Mar; 27(7):7188-7198. PubMed ID: 31883074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the anthropogenic nitrogen emissions to water using a hybrid approach in a city cluster: Insights into historical evolution, attribution, and mitigation potential.
    Zhang Z; Deng C; Dong L; Zou T; Yang Q; Wu J; Li H
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 855():158500. PubMed ID: 36089012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A modified approach of the agricultural grey water footprint considering the nitrogen fixation effect of crops in China.
    Xiao Y; Liu W; Zhang F; Zhu Y; Zhao P
    Environ Pollut; 2024 Jun; 357():124457. PubMed ID: 38945196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ecological risk evaluation of ammonia nitrogen pollution in China based on the ecological grey water footprint model.
    Yan F; Na LI; Jingyi W
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Dec; 347():119087. PubMed ID: 37783081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pharmaceutical grey water footprint: Accounting, influence of wastewater treatment plants and implications of the reuse.
    Martínez-Alcalá I; Pellicer-Martínez F; Fernández-López C
    Water Res; 2018 May; 135():278-287. PubMed ID: 29482095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved grey water footprint model based on uncertainty analysis.
    Li J; Lin M; Feng Y
    Sci Rep; 2023 May; 13(1):7100. PubMed ID: 37130911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Water resource use and driving forces analysis for crop production in China coupling irrigation and water footprint paradigms.
    Zeng W; Cao X; Huang X; Wu M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(24):36133-36146. PubMed ID: 35064504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of livestock pollution and its effects on a water source protection area in China.
    Yang J; Wang Y; Fang S; Qiang Y; Liang J; Yang G; Feng Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 May; 27(15):18632-18639. PubMed ID: 32200474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Income impacts on household consumption's grey water footprint in China.
    Liao X; Chai L; Liang Y
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Feb; 755(Pt 1):142584. PubMed ID: 33039883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Water pollution scenarios and response options for China.
    Feng H; Schyns JF; Krol MS; Yang M; Su H; Liu Y; Lv Y; Zhang X; Yang K; Che Y
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Mar; 914():169807. PubMed ID: 38211873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gray water footprint evaluation of arsenic in Central China: from the perspective of health risk theory.
    Feng Y; Na L
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Oct; 194(12):901. PubMed ID: 36251096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Study on Regional Differences and Convergence of Green Development Efficiency of the Chemical Industry in the Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on Grey Water Footprint.
    Xiang Y; Shao W; Wang S; Zhang Y; Zhang Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Crop water footprints and their driving mechanisms show regional differences.
    Fang H; Wu N; Adamowski J; Wu M; Cao X
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Dec; 904():167549. PubMed ID: 37802358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.