276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32240004)
1. Direct to implant breast reconstruction with biological acellular dermal matrices.
Teoh V; Gui G
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2020 Mar; 81(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 32240004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Acellular dermal matrix and synthetic mesh in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: Current concepts].
Billon R; Hersant B; Bosc R; Meningaud JP
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2019 Mar; 47(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30738819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
Reitsamer R; Peintinger F
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multicentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix.
Chandarana M; Harries S;
BJS Open; 2020 Feb; 4(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 32011819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Graziano FD; Lu J; Sbitany H
Clin Plast Surg; 2023 Apr; 50(2):235-242. PubMed ID: 36813401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
Dikmans RE; Negenborn VL; Bouman MB; Winters HA; Twisk JW; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MA; Smit JM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NA; van Steveninck-Barends JM; Meesters-Caberg MA; van der Hulst RR; Ritt MJ; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2017 Feb; 18(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 28012977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Funnel usefulness in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using periareolar incision with prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with acellular dermal matrix.
Woo J; Seung IH; Hong SE
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Nov; 73(11):2016-2024. PubMed ID: 32921621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.
Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant-based breast reconstruction with meshes and matrices: biological vs synthetic.
Jacobs JM; Salzberg CA
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2015 Apr; 76(4):211-6. PubMed ID: 25853352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of meshes and matrices in breast reconstruction.
Rolph R; Farhadi J
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2018 Aug; 79(8):454-459. PubMed ID: 30070945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prepectoral Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix: Do We See a Difference?
Manrique OJ; Huang TC; Martinez-Jorge J; Ciudad P; Forte AJ; Bustos SS; Boughey JC; Jakub JW; Degnim AC; Galan R
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Feb; 145(2):263e-272e. PubMed ID: 31985613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Algorithmic Approach to Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Version 2.0.
Antony AK; Robinson EC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 May; 143(5):1311-1319. PubMed ID: 31033812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic Review of the Impact of Acellular Dermal Matrix on Aesthetics and Patient Satisfaction in Tissue Expander-to-Implant Breast Reconstructions.
DeLong MR; Tandon VJ; Farajzadeh M; Berlin NL; MacEachern MP; Rudkin GH; Da Lio AL; Cederna PS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Dec; 144(6):967e-974e. PubMed ID: 31764630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Biological implant in single-stage reconstruction of mammary gland for cancer].
Zikiriakhodzhaev AD; Ermoshchenkova MV
Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2015; (1):35-40. PubMed ID: 25909549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early complications and implant loss in implant-based breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix (Tecnoss Protexa®): a comparative study.
Potter S; Chambers A; Govindajulu S; Sahu A; Warr R; Cawthorn S
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 24011501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acellular dermal matrices in primary breast reconstruction: principles, concepts, and indications.
Nahabedian MY
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Nov; 130(5 Suppl 2):44S-53S. PubMed ID: 23096984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Renaissance of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: theoretical basis and research status].
Lin W; Chen J; Tan Q
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Feb; 37(2):233-239. PubMed ID: 36796822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Broad Application of Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix Drape and Fluorescent Imaging in a Community Setting.
Bilezikian JA; Tenzel PL; Bebb GG; Kays CR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Feb; 145(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 31985606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pre-pectoral Immediate Breast Reconstruction Following Conservative Mastectomy Using Acellular Dermal Matrix and Semi-smooth Implants.
Wazir U; Patani N; Heeney J; Mokbel K; Mokbel K
Anticancer Res; 2022 Feb; 42(2):1013-1018. PubMed ID: 35093902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
