These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2637 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32240301)

  • 1. Development of an artificial intelligence-based assessment model for prediction of embryo viability using static images captured by optical light microscopy during IVF.
    VerMilyea M; Hall JMM; Diakiw SM; Johnston A; Nguyen T; Perugini D; Miller A; Picou A; Murphy AP; Perugini M
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):770-784. PubMed ID: 32240301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of an artificial intelligence model for predicting the likelihood of human embryo euploidy based on blastocyst images from multiple imaging systems during IVF.
    Diakiw SM; Hall JMM; VerMilyea MD; Amin J; Aizpurua J; Giardini L; Briones YG; Lim AYX; Dakka MA; Nguyen TV; Perugini D; Perugini M
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Jul; 37(8):1746-1759. PubMed ID: 35674312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Embryologist agreement when assessing blastocyst implantation probability: is data-driven prediction the solution to embryo assessment subjectivity?
    Fordham DE; Rosentraub D; Polsky AL; Aviram T; Wolf Y; Perl O; Devir A; Rosentraub S; Silver DH; Gold Zamir Y; Bronstein AM; Lara Lara M; Ben Nagi J; Alvarez A; Munné S
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Sep; 37(10):2275-2290. PubMed ID: 35944167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A hybrid artificial intelligence model leverages multi-centric clinical data to improve fetal heart rate pregnancy prediction across time-lapse systems.
    Duval A; Nogueira D; Dissler N; Maskani Filali M; Delestro Matos F; Chansel-Debordeaux L; Ferrer-Buitrago M; Ferrer E; Antequera V; Ruiz-Jorro M; Papaxanthos A; Ouchchane H; Keppi B; Prima PY; Regnier-Vigouroux G; Trebesses L; Geoffroy-Siraudin C; Zaragoza S; Scalici E; Sanguinet P; Cassagnard N; Ozanon C; De La Fuente A; Gómez E; Gervoise Boyer M; Boyer P; Ricciarelli E; Pollet-Villard X; Boussommier-Calleja A
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Apr; 38(4):596-608. PubMed ID: 36763673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Embryo selection through artificial intelligence versus embryologists: a systematic review.
    Salih M; Austin C; Warty RR; Tiktin C; Rolnik DL; Momeni M; Rezatofighi H; Reddy S; Smith V; Vollenhoven B; Horta F
    Hum Reprod Open; 2023; 2023(3):hoad031. PubMed ID: 37588797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. BlastAssist: a deep learning pipeline to measure interpretable features of human embryos.
    Yang HY; Leahy BD; Jang WD; Wei D; Kalma Y; Rahav R; Carmon A; Kopel R; Azem F; Venturas M; Kelleher CP; Cam L; Pfister H; Needleman DJ; Ben-Yosef D
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Apr; 39(4):698-708. PubMed ID: 38396213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Generative artificial intelligence to produce high-fidelity blastocyst-stage embryo images.
    Cao P; Derhaag J; Coonen E; Brunner H; Acharya G; Salumets A; Zamani Esteki M
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Jun; 39(6):1197-1207. PubMed ID: 38600621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deep learning as a predictive tool for fetal heart pregnancy following time-lapse incubation and blastocyst transfer.
    Tran D; Cooke S; Illingworth PJ; Gardner DK
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 34(6):1011-1018. PubMed ID: 31111884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical validation of an automatic classification algorithm applied on cleavage stage embryos: analysis for blastulation, euploidy, implantation, and live-birth potential.
    Valera MA; Aparicio-Ruiz B; Pérez-Albalá S; Romany L; Remohí J; Meseguer M
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Jun; 38(6):1060-1075. PubMed ID: 37018626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discard or not discard, that is the question: an international survey across 117 embryologists on the clinical management of borderline quality blastocysts.
    Chiappetta V; Innocenti F; Coticchio G; Ahlström A; Albricci L; Badajoz V; Hebles M; Gallardo M; Benini F; Canosa S; Kumpošt J; Milton K; Montanino Oliva D; Maggiulli R; Rienzi L; Cimadomo D
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Oct; 38(10):1901-1909. PubMed ID: 37649342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3.
    Petersen BM; Boel M; Montag M; Gardner DK
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2231-44. PubMed ID: 27609980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of a deep learning based neural network in the selection of human blastocysts for implantation.
    Bormann CL; Kanakasabapathy MK; Thirumalaraju P; Gupta R; Pooniwala R; Kandula H; Hariton E; Souter I; Dimitriadis I; Ramirez LB; Curchoe CL; Swain J; Boehnlein LM; Shafiee H
    Elife; 2020 Sep; 9():. PubMed ID: 32930094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and evaluation of a live birth prediction model for evaluating human blastocysts from a retrospective study.
    Liu H; Zhang Z; Gu Y; Dai C; Shan G; Song H; Li D; Chen W; Lin G; Sun Y
    Elife; 2023 Feb; 12():. PubMed ID: 36810139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How slow is too slow? A comprehensive portrait of Day 7 blastocysts and their clinical value standardized through artificial intelligence.
    Cimadomo D; Soscia D; Casciani V; Innocenti F; Trio S; Chiappetta V; Albricci L; Maggiulli R; Erlich I; Ben-Meir A; Har-Vardi I; Vaiarelli A; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L
    Hum Reprod; 2022 May; 37(6):1134-1147. PubMed ID: 35459944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The higher the score, the better the clinical outcome: retrospective evaluation of automatic embryo grading as a support tool for embryo selection in IVF laboratories.
    Bori L; Meseguer F; Valera MA; Galan A; Remohi J; Meseguer M
    Hum Reprod; 2022 May; 37(6):1148-1160. PubMed ID: 35435210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Should we freeze it? Agreement on fate of borderline blastocysts is poor and does not improve with a modified blastocyst grading system.
    Hammond ER; Foong AKM; Rosli N; Morbeck DE
    Hum Reprod; 2020 May; 35(5):1045-1053. PubMed ID: 32358601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of morphokinetic models and morphological selection for prioritizing euploid embryos: a multicentre cohort study.
    Bamford T; Smith R; Young S; Evans A; Lockwood M; Easter C; Montgomery S; Barrie A; Dhillon-Smith R; Coomarasamy A; Campbell A
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Jan; 39(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 37963011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An artificial intelligence algorithm to select most viable embryos considering current process in IVF labs.
    Borna MR; Sepehri MM; Maleki B
    Front Artif Intell; 2024; 7():1375474. PubMed ID: 38881952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Artificial intelligence system for outcome evaluations of human in vitro fertilization-derived embryos.
    Sun L; Li J; Zeng S; Luo Q; Miao H; Liang Y; Cheng L; Sun Z; Tai WH; Han Y; Yin Y; Wu K; Zhang K
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2024 Aug; 137(16):1939-1949. PubMed ID: 38997251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective study of automated versus manual annotation of early time-lapse markers in the human preimplantation embryo.
    Kaser DJ; Farland LV; Missmer SA; Racowsky C
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1604-1611. PubMed ID: 28854587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 132.