BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32240682)

  • 1. Horibe GI bleeding prediction score: a simple score for triage decision-making in patients with suspected upper GI bleeding.
    Horibe M; Iwasaki E; Bazerbachi F; Kaneko T; Matsuzaki J; Minami K; Masaoka T; Hosoe N; Ogura Y; Namiki S; Hosoda Y; Ogata H; Chan AT; Kanai T
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Sep; 92(3):578-588.e4. PubMed ID: 32240682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
    Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simple scoring system to assess the need for an endoscopic intervention in suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study.
    Horibe M; Kaneko T; Yokogawa N; Yokota T; Okawa O; Nakatani Y; Ogura Y; Matsuzaki J; Iwasaki E; Hosoe N; Masaoka T; Inadomi JM; Suzuki H; Kanai T; Namiki S
    Dig Liver Dis; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1180-6. PubMed ID: 27507771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
    Bryant RV; Kuo P; Williamson K; Yam C; Schoeman MN; Holloway RH; Nguyen NQ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China.
    Gu L; Xu F; Yuan J
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 29954332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of a new risk score system for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS; Moon HS; Kwon IS; Park JH; Kim JS; Kang SH; Sung JK; Lee ES; Kim SH; Lee BS; Jeong HY
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):193. PubMed ID: 32552662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Ko IG; Kim SE; Chang BS; Kwak MS; Yoon JY; Cha JM; Shin HP; Lee JI; Kim SH; Han JH; Jeon JW
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):159. PubMed ID: 29233096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
    Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
    Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems for the prediction of the risk of in-hospital death among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Lu X; Zhang X; Chen H
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2020 Jun; 112(6):467-473. PubMed ID: 32379473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. External validation and comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford score, modified Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall score and AIMS65 score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a cross-sectional observational study in Western Switzerland.
    Rivieri S; Carron PN; Schoepfer A; Ageron FX
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2023 Feb; 30(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 36542335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
    Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
    BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Shock Index is not accurate at predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Saffouri E; Blackwell C; Laursen SB; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu J; Shultz M; Norton R; Stanley AJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2020 Jan; 51(2):253-260. PubMed ID: 31642558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A simplified clinical risk score predicts the need for early endoscopy in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Tammaro L; Buda A; Di Paolo MC; Zullo A; Hassan C; Riccio E; Vassallo R; Caserta L; Anderloni A; Natali A; ;
    Dig Liver Dis; 2014 Sep; 46(9):783-7. PubMed ID: 24953205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of a Machine Learning Model That Outperforms Clinical Risk Scoring Systems for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Shung DL; Au B; Taylor RA; Tay JK; Laursen SB; Stanley AJ; Dalton HR; Ngu J; Schultz M; Laine L
    Gastroenterology; 2020 Jan; 158(1):160-167. PubMed ID: 31562847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of the need for emergency endoscopic treatment for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and new score model: a retrospective study.
    Sasaki Y; Abe T; Kawamura N; Keitoku T; Shibata I; Ohno S; Ono K; Makishima M
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2022 Jul; 22(1):337. PubMed ID: 35820868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The AIMS65 score compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting outcomes in upper GI bleeding.
    Hyett BH; Abougergi MS; Charpentier JP; Kumar NL; Brozovic S; Claggett BL; Travis AC; Saltzman JR
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Apr; 77(4):551-7. PubMed ID: 23357496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of AIMS65 and Glasgow Blatchford scores in predicting mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Ak R; Hökenek NM
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2021 Jun; 67(5):766-770. PubMed ID: 34550270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of adverse outcomes using non-endoscopic scoring systems in patients over 80 years of age who present with the upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Bardakçı O; Sıddıkoğlu D; Akdur G; Şimşek G; Atalay Ü; Das M; Akdur O; Beyazit Y
    Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2022 Jan; 28(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 34967427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.