BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32240682)

  • 21. Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford Score and Rockall Score in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Custovic N; Husic-Selimovic A; Srsen N; Prohic D
    Med Arch; 2020 Aug; 74(4):270-274. PubMed ID: 33041443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prospective multicenter validation of the Glasgow Blatchford bleeding score in the management of patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage presenting at an emergency department.
    Aquarius M; Smeets FG; Konijn HW; Stassen PM; Keulen ET; Van Deursen CT; Masclee AA; Keulemans YC
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Sep; 27(9):1011-6. PubMed ID: 26049709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Scoring systems used to predict mortality in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the ED.
    Tang Y; Shen J; Zhang F; Zhou X; Tang Z; You T
    Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Jan; 36(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 28673695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of three scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective observational study.
    Zhong M; Chen WJ; Lu XY; Qian J; Zhu CQ
    J Dig Dis; 2016 Dec; 17(12):820-828. PubMed ID: 27930875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Risk assessment scores for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and their use in clinical practice.
    Waddell KM; Stanley AJ
    Hosp Pract (1995); 2015; 43(5):290-8. PubMed ID: 26536295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Safe discharge of patients with low-risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB): can the use of Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score be extended?
    Le Jeune IR; Gordon AL; Farrugia D; Manwani R; Guha IN; James MW
    Acute Med; 2011; 10(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 22111089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of risk scoring systems for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients after renal transplantation: a retrospective observational study in Hunan, China.
    Wang R; Wang Q
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2022 Jul; 22(1):353. PubMed ID: 35879668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Both Full Glasgow-Blatchford Score and Modified Glasgow-Blatchford Score Predict the Need for Intervention and Mortality in Patients with Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Ur-Rahman A; Guan J; Khalid S; Munaf A; Sharbatji M; Idrisov E; He X; Machavarapu A; Abusaada K
    Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(11):3020-3025. PubMed ID: 30022452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Park SM; Yeum SC; Kim BW; Kim JS; Kim JH; Sim EH; Ji JS; Choi H
    Gut Liver; 2016 Jul; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Differences in emergency endoscopy outcomes according to gastrointestinal bleeding location.
    Fujita M; Manabe N; Murao T; Suehiro M; Tanikawa T; Nakamura J; Yo S; Fukushima S; Osawa M; Ayaki M; Sasai T; Kawamoto H; Shiotani A; Haruma K
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2021 Jan; 56(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 33202164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparing AIMS65 Score With MEWS, qSOFA Score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Cirrhotic Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Lai YC; Hung MS; Chen YH; Chen YC
    J Acute Med; 2018 Dec; 8(4):154-167. PubMed ID: 32995218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Comparison between Glascow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65 scores in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital in Lima, Peru].
    Espinoza-Ríos J; Aguilar Sánchez V; Bravo Paredes EA; Pinto Valdivia J; Huerta-Mercado Tenorio J
    Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2016; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 27409091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A modified Glasgow Blatchford Score improves risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleed: a prospective comparison of scoring systems.
    Cheng DW; Lu YW; Teller T; Sekhon HK; Wu BU
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Oct; 36(8):782-9. PubMed ID: 22928529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. External validation of the Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score and the Rockall Score in the US setting.
    Chandra S; Hess EP; Agarwal D; Nestler DM; Montori VM; Song LM; Wells GA; Stiell IG
    Am J Emerg Med; 2012 Jun; 30(5):673-9. PubMed ID: 21641145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prospective validation of the Glasgow Blatchford scoring system in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Köksal Ö; Özeren G; Özdemır F; Armağan E; Aydin Ş; Ayyildiz T
    Turk J Gastroenterol; 2012; 23(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 23161321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Validity of the Pre-endoscopic Scoring Systems for the Prediction of the Failure of Endoscopic Hemostasis in Bleeding Gastroduodenal Peptic Ulcers.
    Iino C; Shimoyama T; Igarashi T; Aihara T; Ishii K; Sakamoto J; Tono H; Fukuda S
    Intern Med; 2018 May; 57(10):1355-1360. PubMed ID: 29321420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of risk scores and shock index in hemodynamically stable patients presenting to the emergency department with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Jung DH; Ko BS; Kim YJ; Kim WY
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Jul; 31(7):781-785. PubMed ID: 31008809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. External validation of scoring systems in risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Anchu AC; Mohsina S; Sureshkumar S; Mahalakshmy T; Kate V
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2017 Mar; 36(2):105-112. PubMed ID: 28393330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prospective Comparison of the AIMS65 Score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Chang A; Ouejiaraphant C; Akarapatima K; Rattanasupa A; Prachayakul V
    Clin Endosc; 2021 Mar; 54(2):211-221. PubMed ID: 32668528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of assessment tools in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: which one for which decision.
    Marmo R; Soncini M; Bucci C; Zullo A;
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 Jan; 57(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 34534036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.