These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32241876)
1. Revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) cervical cancer staging: A review of gaps and questions that remain. Salvo G; Odetto D; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Ramirez PT Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jun; 30(6):873-878. PubMed ID: 32241876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The changes in FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Sehnal B; Sláma J; Kmoníčková E; Dubová O; Zikán M Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(3):216-221. PubMed ID: 31324113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical Cancer: 2018 Revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Staging System and the Role of Imaging. Saleh M; Virarkar M; Javadi S; Elsherif SB; de Castro Faria S; Bhosale P AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 May; 214(5):1182-1195. PubMed ID: 32182097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. From FIGO-2009 to FIGO-2018 in women with early-stage cervical cancer; Does the revised staging reflect risk groups? Sponholtz SE; Mogensen O; Hildebrandt MG; Schledermann D; Parner E; Markauskas A; Frøding LP; Fuglsang K; Holm J; Bjørnholt SM; Jensen PT Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 163(2):281-288. PubMed ID: 34503847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of Parametrial Response by Growth Pattern in Patients With International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IIB and IIIB Cervical Cancer: Analysis of Patients From a Prospective, Multicenter Trial (EMBRACE). Yoshida K; Jastaniyah N; Sturdza A; Lindegaard J; Segedin B; Mahantshetty U; Rai B; Jürgenliemk-Schulz I; Haie-Meder C; Sasaki R; Pötter R Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Nov; 93(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 26530747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic Performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines. Wright JD; Matsuo K; Huang Y; Tergas AI; Hou JY; Khoury-Collado F; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 134(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 31188324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lacunae in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification for cervical carcinoma: observational study using TNM classification as comparator. Meva J; Chaudhary RK; Bhaduri D; Bhatia M; Hatti S; Ba R Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1071-7. PubMed ID: 23792602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiological evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in carcinoma cervix with emphasis on their infiltrative pattern. Dhamija E; Baby A; Bhatla N; Pulappadi VP; Kumar M; Kumar S; Kumar L; Sharma D Indian J Med Res; 2021 Aug; 154(2):383-390. PubMed ID: 35295016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implications of the new FIGO staging and the role of imaging in cervical cancer. Kido A; Nakamoto Y Br J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 94(1125):20201342. PubMed ID: 33989030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Para-aortic lymph node involvement revisited in the light of the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer. Ayhan A; Aslan K; Öz M; Tohma YA; Kuşçu E; Meydanli MM Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 300(3):675-682. PubMed ID: 31263988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 2018 FIGO Staging Classification for Cervical Cancer: Added Benefits of Imaging. Salib MY; Russell JHB; Stewart VR; Sudderuddin SA; Barwick TD; Rockall AG; Bharwani N Radiographics; 2020 Oct; 40(6):1807-1822. PubMed ID: 32946322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing survival outcomes for cervical cancer based on the 2014 and 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging systems. Shin W; Ham TY; Park YR; Lim MC; Won YJ Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):6988. PubMed ID: 33772044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stage I cervix cancer and pelvic node metastasis: special reference to the implications of the new and the recently replaced FIGO classifications on Stage Ia. Boronow RC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Jan; 127(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 831494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix. Sevin BU; Nadji M; Averette HE; Hilsenbeck S; Smith D; Lampe B Cancer; 1992 Oct; 70(8):2121-8. PubMed ID: 1394041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Current FIGO Staging for Carcinoma of the Cervix Uteri and Treatment of Particular Stages. Sehnal B; Kmoníčková E; Sláma J; Tomancová V; Zikán M Klin Onkol; 2019; 32(3):224-231. PubMed ID: 31216857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term Outcomes of MRI Stage IIB Cervical Cancer. Yoon A; Park JJ; Park BK; Lee YY; Paik ES; Choi CH; Kim TJ; Kim CK; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Sep; 26(7):1252-7. PubMed ID: 27284726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and validation of a surgical-pathologic staging and scoring system for cervical cancer. Li S; Li X; Zhang Y; Zhou H; Tang F; Jia Y; Hu T; Sun H; Yang R; Chen Y; Cheng X; Lv W; Wu L; Zhou J; Wang S; Huang K; Wang L; Yao Y; Yang Q; Yang X; Zhang Q; Han X; Lin Z; Xing H; Qu P; Cai H; Song X; Tian X; Shen J; Xi L; Li K; Deng D; Wang H; Wang C; Wu M; Zhu T; Chen G; Gao Q; Wang S; Hu J; Kong B; Xie X; Ma D Oncotarget; 2016 Apr; 7(15):21054-63. PubMed ID: 27014971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interobserver variability of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging in cervical cancer. Tummers P; Gerestein K; Mens JW; Verstraelen H; van Doorn H Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jun; 23(5):890-4. PubMed ID: 23640293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Management of stage I and II cervical cancer: a review. Chou B; Prasad Venkatesulu B; Coleman RL; Harkenrider M; Small W Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2022 Mar; 32(3):216-224. PubMed ID: 35256406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]