152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32243728)
1. Review of the accuracy of multi-parametric MRI prostate in detecting prostate cancer within a local reporting service.
Tsai WC; Field L; Stewart S; Schultz M
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jun; 64(3):379-384. PubMed ID: 32243728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of 29 MHz transrectal micro-ultrasound to stratify the prostate cancer risk in patients with PI-RADS III lesions at multiparametric MRI: A single institutional analysis.
Avolio PP; Lughezzani G; Paciotti M; Maffei D; Uleri A; Frego N; Hurle R; Lazzeri M; Saita A; Guazzoni G; Casale P; Buffi NM
Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 39(12):832.e1-832.e7. PubMed ID: 34183255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Sathianathen NJ; Omer A; Harriss E; Davies L; Kasivisvanathan V; Punwani S; Moore CM; Kastner C; Barrett T; Van Den Bergh RC; Eddy BA; Gleeson F; Macpherson R; Bryant RJ; Catto JWF; Murphy DG; Hamdy FC; Ahmed HU; Lamb AD
Eur Urol; 2020 Sep; 78(3):402-414. PubMed ID: 32444265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy and agreement of PIRADSv2 for prostate cancer mpMRI: A multireader study.
Greer MD; Brown AM; Shih JH; Summers RM; Marko J; Law YM; Sankineni S; George AK; Merino MJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Feb; 45(2):579-585. PubMed ID: 27391860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical utility of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy in patients with lower suspicion lesions on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Lokeshwar SD; Nguyen J; Rahman SN; Khajir G; Ho R; Ghabili K; Leapman MS; Weinreb JC; Sprenkle PC
Urol Oncol; 2022 Sep; 40(9):407.e21-407.e27. PubMed ID: 35811206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate and targeted biopsy, Comparison of PIRADS and Gleason grading.
Bastian-Jordan M
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2018 Apr; 62(2):183-187. PubMed ID: 28990727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study.
Brown LC; Ahmed HU; Faria R; El-Shater Bosaily A; Gabe R; Kaplan RS; Parmar M; Collaco-Moraes Y; Ward K; Hindley RG; Freeman A; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Bott S; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; Ghei M; Henderson A; Persad R; Rosario DJ; Shergill I; Winkler M; Soares M; Spackman E; Sculpher M; Emberton M
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Jul; 22(39):1-176. PubMed ID: 30040065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histology core-specific evaluation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) standardised scoring system of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Rieker P; Roth W; Fenchel M; Hohenfellner M; Schlemmer HP; Hadaschik BA
BJU Int; 2013 Dec; 112(8):1080-7. PubMed ID: 23937255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation Varies Substantially Across Radiologists.
Sonn GA; Fan RE; Ghanouni P; Wang NN; Brooks JD; Loening AM; Daniel BL; To'o KJ; Thong AE; Leppert JT
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Jul; 5(4):592-599. PubMed ID: 29226826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. PI-RADS 3 lesions: Does the association of the lesion volume with the prostate-specific antigen density matter in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer?
Rico L; Blas L; Vitagliano G; Contreras P; Rios Pita H; Ameri C
Urol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):431.e9-431.e13. PubMed ID: 33221259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel.
Moldovan PC; Van den Broeck T; Sylvester R; Marconi L; Bellmunt J; van den Bergh RCN; Bolla M; Briers E; Cumberbatch MG; Fossati N; Gross T; Henry AM; Joniau S; van der Kwast TH; Matveev VB; van der Poel HG; De Santis M; Schoots IG; Wiegel T; Yuan CY; Cornford P; Mottet N; Lam TB; Rouvière O
Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):250-266. PubMed ID: 28336078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy of
Scheltema MJ; Chang JI; Stricker PD; van Leeuwen PJ; Nguyen QA; Ho B; Delprado W; Lee J; Thompson JE; Cusick T; Spriensma AS; Siriwardana AR; Yuen C; Kooner R; Hruby G; O'Neill G; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2019 Nov; 124 Suppl 1():42-49. PubMed ID: 31287613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate cancer on computed tomography: A direct comparison with multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging and tissue pathology.
Jia JB; Houshyar R; Verma S; Uchio E; Lall C
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):261-267. PubMed ID: 26526901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of 3T multiparametric prostate MRI using prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS) version 2 with biopsy as reference standard.
Mathur S; O'Malley ME; Ghai S; Jhaveri K; Sreeharsha B; Margolis M; Zhong L; Maan H; Toi A
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jan; 44(1):252-258. PubMed ID: 30032385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of mpMRI in qualification of patients with ISUP 1 prostate cancer on biopsy to radical prostatectomy.
Nyk Ł; Tayara O; Ząbkowski T; Kryst P; Andrychowicz A; Malewski W
BMC Urol; 2021 May; 21(1):82. PubMed ID: 34006281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel nomogram combined PIRADS v2 and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio to predict the risk of clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PSA < 10 ng/ml at first biopsy.
Sun J; Zhang Z; OuYang J
Urol Oncol; 2020 May; 38(5):401-409. PubMed ID: 31870724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of Individual Prostate Cancer Foci via Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Johnson DC; Raman SS; Mirak SA; Kwan L; Bajgiran AM; Hsu W; Maehara CK; Ahuja P; Faiena I; Pooli A; Salmasi A; Sisk A; Felker ER; Lu DSK; Reiter RE
Eur Urol; 2019 May; 75(5):712-720. PubMed ID: 30509763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integrated 68Gallium Labelled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-11 Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging Enhances Discriminatory Power of Multi-Parametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Al-Bayati M; Grueneisen J; Lütje S; Sawicki LM; Suntharalingam S; Tschirdewahn S; Forsting M; Rübben H; Herrmann K; Umutlu L; Wetter A
Urol Int; 2018; 100(2):164-171. PubMed ID: 29393268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In-gantry MRI guided prostate biopsy diagnosis of prostatitis and its relationship with PIRADS V.2 based score.
Jyoti R; Jina NH; Haxhimolla HZ
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2017 Apr; 61(2):212-215. PubMed ID: 27987276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
