157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32243774)
1. A technique to measure respirator protection factors against aerosol particles in simulated workplace settings using portable instruments.
Vo E; Horvatin M; Bergman M; Wu B; Zhuang Z
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2020 May; 17(5):231-242. PubMed ID: 32243774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Respirator Performance against Nanoparticles under Simulated Workplace Activities.
Vo E; Zhuang Z; Horvatin M; Liu Y; He X; Rengasamy S
Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 Oct; 59(8):1012-21. PubMed ID: 26180261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are quantitative fit factors predictive of respirator fit during simulated healthcare activities?
Sietsema M; Brosseau LM
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Dec; 15(12):803-809. PubMed ID: 30142034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Protection of firefighters against combustion aerosol particles: simulated workplace protection factor of a half-mask respirator (pilot study).
Dietrich J; Yermakov M; Reponen T; Kulkarni P; Qi C; Grinshpun SA
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(6):415-20. PubMed ID: 25625543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance Comparison of Field Portable Instruments to the Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer Using Monodispersed and Polydispersed Sodium Chloride Aerosols.
Vo E; Horvatin M; Zhuang Z
Ann Work Expo Health; 2018 Jul; 62(6):711-720. PubMed ID: 29788040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Real-time fit of a respirator during simulated health care tasks.
Hauge J; Roe M; Brosseau LM; Colton C
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(10):563-71. PubMed ID: 22924959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices.
Lawrence RB; Duling MG; Calvert CA; Coffey CC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Sep; 3(9):465-74. PubMed ID: 16857645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of two respiratory protective devices used by home-attending health care workers (a pilot study).
Elmashae RBY; Grinshpun SA; Reponen T; Yermakov M; Riddle R
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Sep; 14(9):D145-D149. PubMed ID: 28585893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Protection factor for N95 filtering facepiece respirators exposed to laboratory aerosols containing different concentrations of nanoparticles.
Rengasamy S; Walbert G; Newcomb W; Coffey C; Wassell JT; Szalajda J
Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 Apr; 59(3):373-81. PubMed ID: 25429023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of pressure drop and filtration efficiency of particulate respirators using welding fumes and sodium chloride.
Cho HW; Yoon CS; Lee JH; Lee SJ; Viner A; Johnson EW
Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jul; 55(6):666-80. PubMed ID: 21742627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simulated workplace protection factor study of powered air-purifying and supplied air respirators.
Cohen HJ; Hecker LH; Mattheis DK; Johnson JS; Biermann AH; Foote KL
AIHAJ; 2001; 62(5):595-604. PubMed ID: 11669385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Simulated Workplace Protection Factors Offered by N95 and P100 Filtering Facepiece and Elastomeric Half-Mask Respirators against Particles of 10 to 400 nm.
He X; Vo E; Horvatin M; Liu Y; Bergman M; Zhuang Z
J Nanotechnol Mater Sci; 2015 Sep; 2(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 26273701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of filter media for particle number, surface area and mass penetrations.
Li L; Zuo Z; Japuntich DA; Pui DY
Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):581-94. PubMed ID: 22752097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fitting characteristics of eighteen N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Campbell DL; Zhuang Z; Calvert CA; Jensen PA
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Apr; 1(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 15204866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing real-time performances of N95 respirators for health care workers by simulated workplace protection factors.
Kim H; Baek JE; Seo HK; Lee JE; Myong JP; Lee SJ; Lee JH
Ind Health; 2015; 53(6):553-61. PubMed ID: 26320728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Total inward leakage measurement of particulates for N95 filtering facepiece respirators--a comparison study.
Rengasamy S; Walbert GF; Newcomb WE; Faulkner K; Rengasamy MM; Brannen JJ; Szalajda JV
Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Mar; 58(2):206-16. PubMed ID: 24107745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of N95 FFRs Against Combustion and NaCl Aerosols in Dry and Moderately Humid Air: Manikin-based Study.
Gao S; Kim J; Yermakov M; Elmashae Y; He X; Reponen T; Zhuang Z; Rengasamy S; Grinshpun SA
Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Jul; 60(6):748-60. PubMed ID: 27094179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New respirator performance monitor (RePM) for powered air-purifying respirators.
Grinshpun SA; Corey J; Yermakov M; Wu B; Strickland KT; Bergman M; Zhuang Z
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2020; 17(11-12):538-545. PubMed ID: 32941118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simulated workplace protection factors for half-facepiece respiratory protective devices.
Duling MG; Lawrence RB; Slaven JE; Coffey CC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jun; 4(6):420-31. PubMed ID: 17474032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of Facepiece Respirators and Surgical Masks Against Surgical Smoke: Simulated Workplace Protection Factor Study.
Gao S; Koehler RH; Yermakov M; Grinshpun SA
Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Jun; 60(5):608-18. PubMed ID: 26929204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
