BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32244732)

  • 21. Conventional slow freezing, vitrification and open pulled straw (OPS) vitrification of rabbit embryos.
    Naik BR; Rao BS; Vagdevi R; Gnanprakash M; Amarnath D; Rao VH
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2005 Apr; 86(3-4):329-38. PubMed ID: 15766810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factors affecting survival rates of in vitro produced bovine embryos after vitrification and direct in-straw rehydration.
    Vajta G; Holm P; Greve T; Callesen H
    Anim Reprod Sci; 1996 Dec; 45(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 9227922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Vitrification of cleavage stage day 3 embryos results in higher live birth rates than conventional slow freezing: a RCT.
    Debrock S; Peeraer K; Fernandez Gallardo E; De Neubourg D; Spiessens C; D'Hooghe TM
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1820-30. PubMed ID: 26089301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Risk of Contamination of Gametes and Embryos during Cryopreservation and Measures to Prevent Cross-Contamination.
    Joaquim DC; Borges ED; Viana IGR; Navarro PA; Vireque AA
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():1840417. PubMed ID: 28890894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vitro assessment of a direct transfer vitrification procedure for bovine embryos.
    Campos-Chillòn LF; Walker DJ; de la Torre-Sanchez JF; Seidel GE
    Theriogenology; 2006 Apr; 65(6):1200-14. PubMed ID: 16169072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A strategy for rapid cooling of mouse embryos within a double straw to eliminate the risk of contamination during storage in liquid nitrogen.
    Kuleshova LL; Shaw JM
    Hum Reprod; 2000 Dec; 15(12):2604-9. PubMed ID: 11098034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Efficient cryopreservation of mouse embryos by modified droplet vitrification (MDV).
    An L; Chang S; Hu Y; Li Y; Xu B; Zhang F; Yang L; Presicce GA; Du F
    Cryobiology; 2015 Aug; 71(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 26025881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Open versus closed systems for vitrification of human oocytes and embryos.
    Vajta G; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Apr; 30(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 25639657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Equilibrium vitrification of mouse embryos at various developmental stages.
    Jin B; Mochida K; Ogura A; Koshimoto C; Matsukawa K; Kasai M; Edashige K
    Mol Reprod Dev; 2012 Nov; 79(11):785-94. PubMed ID: 22987665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Blastocyst transfer after aseptic vitrification of zygotes: an approach to overcome an impaired uterine environment.
    Vanderzwalmen P; Zech NH; Ectors F; Stecher A; Lejeune B; Vanderzwalmen S; Wirleitner B
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Dec; 25(6):591-9. PubMed ID: 23069744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cryopreservation of pig embryos: adaptation of vitrification technology for embryo transfer.
    Dobrinsky JR
    Reprod Suppl; 2001; 58():325-33. PubMed ID: 11980201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Vitrification of human pronuclear oocytes by direct plunging into cooling agent: Non sterile liquid nitrogen vs. sterile liquid air.
    Isachenko V; Todorov P; Seisenbayeva A; Toishibekov Y; Isachenko E; Rahimi G; Mallmann P; Foth D; Merzenich M
    Cryobiology; 2018 Feb; 80():84-88. PubMed ID: 29175537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Double vitrification of rat embryos at different developmental stages using an identical protocol.
    Isachenko V; Folch J; Isachenko E; Nawroth F; Krivokharchenko A; Vajta G; Dattena M; Alabart JL
    Theriogenology; 2003 Aug; 60(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 12763158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improved survival of vitrified in vivo-derived porcine embryos.
    Ushijima H; Yoshioka H; Esaki R; Takahashi K; Kuwayama M; Nakane T; Nagashima H
    J Reprod Dev; 2004 Aug; 50(4):481-6. PubMed ID: 15329481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Open-pulled straw vitrification differentiates cryotolerance of in vitro cultured rabbit embryos at the eight-cell stage.
    Lin TA; Chen CH; Sung LY; Carter MG; Chen YE; Du F; Ju JC; Xu J
    Theriogenology; 2011 Mar; 75(4):760-8. PubMed ID: 21144562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Vitrification of in vivo and in vitro produced ovine blastocysts.
    Zhu SE; Zeng SM; Yu WL; Li SJ; Zhang ZC; Chen YF
    Anim Biotechnol; 2001 Nov; 12(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 11808635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vitro postwarming viability of vitrified porcine embryos: effect of cryostorage length.
    Sanchez-Osorio J; Cuello C; Gil MA; Parrilla I; Almiñana C; Caballero I; Roca J; Vazquez JM; Rodriguez-Martinez H; Martinez EA
    Theriogenology; 2010 Aug; 74(3):486-90. PubMed ID: 20452005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Vitrification of mouse pronuclear oocytes with no direct liquid nitrogen contact.
    Larman MG; Sheehan CB; Gardner DK
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2006 Jan; 12(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 16454937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Viral screening of spent culture media and liquid nitrogen samples of oocytes and embryos from hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and human immunodeficiency virus chronically infected women undergoing in vitro fertilization cycles.
    Cobo A; Bellver J; de los Santos MJ; Remohí J
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Jan; 97(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 22035968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Barcode tagging of human oocytes and embryos to prevent mix-ups in assisted reproduction technologies.
    Novo S; Nogués C; Penon O; Barrios L; Santaló J; Gómez-Martínez R; Esteve J; Errachid A; Plaza JA; Pérez-García L; Ibáñez E
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jan; 29(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 24227078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.