BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32244988)

  • 1. Valuation Impacts of Environmental Protection Taxes and Regulatory Costs in Heavy-Polluting Industries.
    Tu WJ; Yue XG; Liu W; Crabbe MJC
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 32244988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of the environmental protection tax law on heavily polluting firms in China.
    Wen H; Deng W; Guo Q
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261342. PubMed ID: 34914798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Environmental protection subsidies, green technology innovation and environmental performance: Evidence from China's heavy-polluting listed firms.
    Du C; Zhang Q; Huang D
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0278629. PubMed ID: 36735660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Will the "Environmental Fees to Taxes" Affect Firm Charitable Giving?
    Niu F; Wang J; Su W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(23):. PubMed ID: 36497745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adjusting export tax rebates to reduce the environmental impacts of trade: Lessons from China.
    Song P; Mao X; Corsetti G
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Sep; 161():408-416. PubMed ID: 26210774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A study on the "Porter Hypothesis" effect of the regulatory measures of the environmental protection tax law in the post-pandemic era.
    Tao W; Zhou JY
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0304636. PubMed ID: 38820316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How do the China Pollution Discharge Fee Policy and the Environmental Protection Tax Law affect firm performance during the transitional period?
    Zheng H; He Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jun; 29(29):44541-44557. PubMed ID: 35137311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of environmental tax laws on heavy-polluting enterprise ESG performance: A stakeholder behavior perspective.
    He X; Jing Q; Chen H
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Oct; 344():118578. PubMed ID: 37454448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Central environmental protection inspector and stock price crash risk-evidence from polluting industries firms in China.
    Wen M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(3):6530-6543. PubMed ID: 35997882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Re-examining the governance effect of China's environmental protection tax.
    Lin Y; Liao L; Yu C; Yang Q
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(22):62325-62340. PubMed ID: 36940026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of expected financial performance on corporate environmental responsibility disclosure: evidence from China.
    Zeng Y; Gulzar MA; Wang Z; Zhao X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Oct; 27(30):37946-37962. PubMed ID: 32613511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How High-Polluting Firms Suffer from Being Distracted form Intended Purpose: A Corporate Social Responsibility Perspective.
    Zhao XZ; Chen J; Chen FW; Wang W; Xia S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 17(24):. PubMed ID: 33317027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environmental Information Disclosure, Digital Transformation, and Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from Chinese Heavy Polluting Listed Companies.
    Liu H; Liu W; Chen G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Aug; 19(15):. PubMed ID: 35955011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Environmental protection tax and the labor income share of companies: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China.
    Xiao Q; Jiang Y; Li R; Xiao S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(14):41820-41833. PubMed ID: 36640237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distance matters: Investigating how geographic proximity to ENGOs triggers green innovation of heavy-polluting firms in China.
    Hu C; Mao J; Tian M; Wei Y; Guo L; Wang Z
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Feb; 279():111542. PubMed ID: 33162234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of the new Environmental Protection Law on corporate financialization in China.
    Xie G; Yang Y; Jiang K; Chen Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Nov; 29(55):83596-83611. PubMed ID: 35764736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Will environmental information disclosure affect bank credit decisions and corporate debt financing costs? Evidence from China's heavily polluting industries.
    Du M; Chai S; Wei W; Wang S; Li Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jul; 29(31):47661-47672. PubMed ID: 35184238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Labor Costs, Market Environment and Green Technological Innovation: Evidence from High-Pollution Firms.
    Gong R; Wu YQ; Chen FW; Yan TH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jan; 17(2):. PubMed ID: 31947618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of green mergers and acquisitions on illegal pollution discharge of heavy polluting firms: Mechanism, heterogeneity and spillover effects.
    Lu J; Li H; Wang G
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Aug; 340():117973. PubMed ID: 37119626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Green credit, environmental protection investment and debt financing for heavily polluting enterprises.
    Ji L; Jia P; Yan J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261311. PubMed ID: 34910790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.