These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32245607)

  • 21. Assessing the role of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.
    Bogani G; Di Donato V; Muzii L; Casarin J; Ghezzi F; Malzoni M; Greggi S; Landoni F; Bazzurini L; Zanagnolo V; Multinu F; Angioli R; Plotti F; Caruso G; Fischetti M; Ferrandina G; Palaia I; Benedetti Panici P; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Aug; 275():64-69. PubMed ID: 35753229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Patterns of recurrence and survival after abdominal versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer.
    Kong TW; Chang SJ; Piao X; Paek J; Lee Y; Lee EJ; Chun M; Ryu HS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Jan; 42(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 26554751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Robotic Surgery Compared With Laparoscopic and Abdominal Surgery in the Management of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
    Corrado G; Cutillo G; Saltari M; Mancini E; Sindico S; Vici P; Sergi D; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Pomati G; Baiocco E; Vizza E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):539-46. PubMed ID: 26825826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Surgical approach to hysterectomy and barriers to using minimally invasive methods.
    Janda M; Armfield NR; Kerr G; Kurz S; Jackson G; Currie J; Page K; Weaver E; Yazdani A; Obermair A
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Dec; 58(6):690-695. PubMed ID: 29763509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
    Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Learning Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: Are We Facing an Emerging Situation?
    Moufawad G; Laganà AS; Habib N; Chiantera V; Giannini A; Ferrari F; Vitagliano A; Della Corte L; Bifulco G; Sleiman Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36767419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Novel Technique to Minimize Contamination for Cervical Cancer Surgery Patients.
    Martino MA; Bixel K; Johnson AM; Wejkszner T; Jacobs A; Lazaro J; Makarova E; Thomas MB; Fowler J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1624-1630. PubMed ID: 31931144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of uterine manipulator in endometrial cancer: A French survey from Francogyn group.
    Sallee C; Lacorre A; Despoux F; Ouldamer L; Huchon C; Koskas M; Classe JM; Guyon F; Margueritte F; Raimond E; Gauthier T
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun; 48(6):1395-1399. PubMed ID: 35177312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does the Use of a Uterine Manipulator or Intracorporeal Colpotomy Confer an Inferior Prognosis in Minimally Invasive Surgery-Treated Early-stage Cervical Cancer?
    Wang R; Hu Y; Xia H; Zhu X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Feb; 30(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 36410659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Surgical Management of Early Cervical Cancer: When Is Laparoscopic Appropriate?
    Greggi S; Casella G; Scala F; Falcone F; Visconti S; Scaffa C
    Curr Oncol Rep; 2020 Jan; 22(1):7. PubMed ID: 31989322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
    Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Changing treatment landscape for early cervical cancer: outcomes reported with minimally invasive surgery compared with an open approach.
    Melamed A; Ramirez PT
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 32(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 31815768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
    Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A single-center study.
    Oyama K; Kanno K; Kojima R; Shirane A; Yanai S; Ota Y; Andou M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Feb; 45(2):405-411. PubMed ID: 30426602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A census of laparoscopic and robotic urological practice: a survey of minimally invasive surgery department of the Brazilian Society of Urology.
    Rocha MFH; Coelho RF; Branco AW; Filgueira PHO; Guida R
    Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(4):732-738. PubMed ID: 31184455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial.
    Falconer H; Palsdottir K; Stalberg K; Dahm-Kähler P; Ottander U; Lundin ES; Wijk L; Kimmig R; Jensen PT; Zahl Eriksson AG; Mäenpää J; Persson J; Salehi S
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jul; 29(6):1072-1076. PubMed ID: 31203203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Overview of laparoscopic surgery for cervical cancer in Japan: Updates after the laparoscopic approach to cervical cancer trial.
    Kobayashi E; Kakuda M; Ueda Y; Kimura T
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Jan; 49(1):90-102. PubMed ID: 36318924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Robot-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial and cervical cancers: a systematic review.
    Nevis IF; Vali B; Higgins C; Dhalla I; Urbach D; Bernardini MQ
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 27424111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
    Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Women With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single-institution Experience of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes.
    Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Cárdenas-Rebollo JM; Achilarre MT; Garbi A; Patrono MG; Colombo N; Maggioni A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 27158094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.