These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32246268)

  • 1. Nonmydriatic widefield retinal imaging with an automatic white LED confocal imaging system compared with dilated ophthalmoscopy in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
    Borrelli E; Querques L; Lattanzio R; Cavalleri M; Grazioli Moretti A; Di Biase C; Signorino A; Gelormini F; Sacconi R; Bandello F; Querques G
    Acta Diabetol; 2020 Sep; 57(9):1043-1047. PubMed ID: 32246268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.
    Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Noble J; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 154(3):549-559.e2. PubMed ID: 22626617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes.
    Chow SP; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Katalinic P; Hock K; Tolson A; Kirby R; Bursell SE; Aiello LP
    Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 16650680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography.
    Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers RJ; Grosvenor DM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 12140027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of low-light nonmydriatic digital imaging with 35-mm ETDRS seven-standard field stereo color fundus photographs and clinical examination.
    Silva PS; Walia S; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Dunn C; Bursell SE; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
    Telemed J E Health; 2012 Sep; 18(7):492-9. PubMed ID: 22827402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ETDRS grading with CLARUS ultra-widefield images shows agreement with 7-fields colour fundus photography.
    Santos AR; Ghate S; Lopes M; Rocha AC; Santos T; Reste-Ferreira D; Manivannan N; Foote K; Cunha-Vaz J
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2024 Sep; 24(1):387. PubMed ID: 39227901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of 1-field, 2-fields, and 3-fields fundus photography for detection and grading of diabetic retinopathy.
    Lee JC; Nguyen L; Hynan LS; Blomquist PH
    J Diabetes Complications; 2019 Dec; 33(12):107441. PubMed ID: 31668742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: the utility of nonmydriatic retinal photography in Egyptian adults.
    Penman AD; Saaddine JB; Hegazy M; Sous ES; Ali MA; Brechner RJ; Herman WH; Engelgau MM; Klein R
    Diabet Med; 1998 Sep; 15(9):783-7. PubMed ID: 9737809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study 7-field retinal photos and non-mydriatic, mydriatic and mydriatic steered widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy for assessment of diabetic retinopathy.
    Rasmussen ML; Broe R; Frydkjaer-Olsen U; Olsen BS; Mortensen HB; Peto T; Grauslund J
    J Diabetes Complications; 2015; 29(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 25240716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity and specificity of nonmydriatic digital imaging in screening diabetic retinopathy in Indian eyes.
    Gupta V; Bansal R; Gupta A; Bhansali A
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2014 Aug; 62(8):851-6. PubMed ID: 25230960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness and safety of screening for diabetic retinopathy with two nonmydriatic digital images compared with the seven standard stereoscopic photographic fields.
    Boucher MC; Gresset JA; Angioi K; Olivier S
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 38(7):557-68. PubMed ID: 14740797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of diabetic retinopathy using nonmydriatic ultra-widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Optomap) compared with ETDRS 7-field stereo photography.
    Kernt M; Hadi I; Pinter F; Seidensticker F; Hirneiss C; Haritoglou C; Kampik A; Ulbig MW; Neubauer AS
    Diabetes Care; 2012 Dec; 35(12):2459-63. PubMed ID: 22912430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonmydriatic screening for diabetic retinopathy by ultra-widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Optomap).
    Neubauer AS; Kernt M; Haritoglou C; Priglinger SG; Kampik A; Ulbig MW
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 246(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 17622548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-mydriatic fundus photography: a viable alternative to fundoscopy for identification of diabetic retinopathy in an Aboriginal population in rural Western Australia?
    Diamond JP; McKinnon M; Barry C; Geary D; McAllister IL; House P; Constable IJ
    Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1998 May; 26(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 9630290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Using Smartphone-Based Fundus Imaging in India.
    Wintergerst MWM; Mishra DK; Hartmann L; Shah P; Konana VK; Sagar P; Berger M; Murali K; Holz FG; Shanmugam MP; Finger RP
    Ophthalmology; 2020 Nov; 127(11):1529-1538. PubMed ID: 32464129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of the smartphone-based nonmydriatic retinal camera in the detection of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy.
    Prathiba V; Rajalakshmi R; Arulmalar S; Usha M; Subhashini R; Gilbert CE; Anjana RM; Mohan V
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2020 Feb; 68(Suppl 1):S42-S46. PubMed ID: 31937728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: 1 and 3 nonmydriatic 45-degree digital fundus photographs vs 7 standard early treatment diabetic retinopathy study fields.
    Vujosevic S; Benetti E; Massignan F; Pilotto E; Varano M; Cavarzeran F; Avogaro A; Midena E
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jul; 148(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 19406376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why Miss the Chance? Incidental Findings while Telescreening for Diabetic Retinopathy.
    Mastropasqua L; Perilli R; D'Aloisio R; Toto L; Mastropasqua A; Donato S; Taraborrelli M; Ginestra F; Porta M; Consoli A
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2020 Aug; 27(4):237-245. PubMed ID: 31958252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photography.
    Lee VS; Kingsley RM; Lee ET; Lu M; Russell D; Asal NR; Bradford RH; Wilkinson CP
    Ophthalmology; 1993 Oct; 100(10):1504-12. PubMed ID: 8414411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of digital fundus images as a diagnostic method for surveillance of diabetic retinopathy.
    Chun DW; Bauer RM; Ward TP; Dick JS; Bower KS
    Mil Med; 2007 Apr; 172(4):405-10. PubMed ID: 17484313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.