These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32246294)
21. The MiLES intervention targeting employers to promote successful return to work of employees with cancer: design of a pilot randomised controlled trial. Greidanus MA; de Boer AGEM; de Rijk AE; Frings-Dresen MHW; Tamminga SJ Trials; 2020 Apr; 21(1):363. PubMed ID: 32345344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Colorectal cancer survivors' challenges to returning to work: A qualitative study. Gruß I; Hanson G; Bradley C; McMullen C; Ritzwoller D; Hodge S; Varga A; Banegas MP Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2019 Jul; 28(4):e13044. PubMed ID: 31006931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Return to work or job transition? Employer dilemmas in taking social responsibility for return to work in local workplace practice. Seing I; MacEachen E; Ekberg K; Ståhl C Disabil Rehabil; 2015; 37(19):1760-9. PubMed ID: 25355548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Employee experience of workplace supervisor contact and support during long-term sickness absence. Buys NJ; Selander J; Sun J Disabil Rehabil; 2019 Apr; 41(7):808-814. PubMed ID: 29212387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Empowering self-direction in return to work of employees with low and high levels of education: A qualitative comparative study. Hoefsmit N; Pennings B; Houkes I Work; 2023; 74(3):859-869. PubMed ID: 36442176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Workplace managers' view of the role of co-workers in return-to-work. Dunstan DA; MacEachen E Disabil Rehabil; 2016 Nov; 38(23):2324-33. PubMed ID: 27554071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. What do employers need when supporting stroke survivors to return to work?: a mixed-methods study. Craven K; Kettlewell J; De Dios Pérez B; Powers K; Holmes J; Radford KA Top Stroke Rehabil; 2024 Oct; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 39364633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. How to strengthen the RTW process and collaboration between patients with chronic pain and their employers in interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs? Patients' experiences of the Demand and Ability Protocol. Johansson E; Svartengren M; Danielsson K; Hellman T Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Jun; 45(12):2013-2020. PubMed ID: 35687518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Supporting return-to-work in the face of legislation: stakeholders' experiences with return-to-work after breast cancer in Belgium. Tiedtke C; Donceel P; Knops L; Désiron H; Dierckx de Casterlé B; de Rijk A J Occup Rehabil; 2012 Jun; 22(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 22105670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Return to work following acquired brain injury: the views of patients and employers. Donker-Cools BHPM; Schouten MJE; Wind H; Frings-Dresen MHW Disabil Rehabil; 2018 Jan; 40(2):185-191. PubMed ID: 27830952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Return-to-Work Following Depression: What Work Accommodations Do Employers and Human Resources Directors Put in Place? Bastien MF; Corbière M J Occup Rehabil; 2019 Jun; 29(2):423-432. PubMed ID: 30039312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Perceived Barriers and Facilitators for Return to Work Among Colorectal Cancer Survivors: Malaysian Healthcare Professionals Experience- A Qualitative Inquiry. Chow SL; Loh SY; Su TT J UOEH; 2015 Jun; 37(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 26073502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Factors influencing employers' support for employees with acquired brain injuries or mental illness to return to- and stay in work: A qualitative systematic review. Craven K; De Dios Pérez B; Holmes J; Fisher R; Radford KA Work; 2024; 79(1):93-121. PubMed ID: 38217562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The experiences and perceptions of employers on cancer survivors returning to work: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Kuai B; Huang Y; Su X; Shi Y; Feng G; Hu L; Guo Y Support Care Cancer; 2024 Jun; 32(7):454. PubMed ID: 38913103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Workplace support after breast cancer treatment: recognition of vulnerability. Tiedtke C; Dierckx de Casterlé B; Donceel P; de Rijk A Disabil Rehabil; 2015; 37(19):1770-6. PubMed ID: 25401405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Factors promoting a successful return to work: from an employer and employee perspective. Jakobsen K; Lillefjell M Scand J Occup Ther; 2014 Jan; 21(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 24289662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Employers' Perspectives on Accommodating and Retaining Employees with Newly Acquired Disabilities: An Exploratory Study. Gould-Werth A; Morrison K; Ben-Shalom Y J Occup Rehabil; 2018 Dec; 28(4):611-633. PubMed ID: 30218402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled study of a multicomponent intervention to promote a sustainable return to work of workers on long-term sick leave - PROWORK: PROmoting a Sustainable and Healthy Return to WORK. Varela-Mato V; Godfree K; Adem A; Blake H; Bartle C; Daly G; Hassard J; Kneller R; Meyer C; Russell S; Marwaha S; Kershaw C; Newman K; Yarker J; Thomson L; Munir F Pilot Feasibility Stud; 2022 Aug; 8(1):188. PubMed ID: 35986424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Supporting employers to enhance the return to work of cancer survivors: development of a web-based intervention (MiLES intervention). Greidanus MA; de Boer AGEM; Tiedtke CM; Frings-Dresen MHW; de Rijk AE; Tamminga SJ J Cancer Surviv; 2020 Apr; 14(2):200-210. PubMed ID: 31938966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]