BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32246820)

  • 41. EROS-DOCK: protein-protein docking using exhaustive branch-and-bound rotational search.
    Ruiz Echartea ME; Chauvot de Beauchêne I; Ritchie DW
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 35(23):5003-5010. PubMed ID: 31125060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Complex-type-dependent scoring functions in protein-protein docking.
    Li CH; Ma XH; Shen LZ; Chang S; Chen WZ; Wang CX
    Biophys Chem; 2007 Aug; 129(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17540496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A new protein-protein docking scoring function based on interface residue properties.
    Bernauer J; Azé J; Janin J; Poupon A
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(5):555-62. PubMed ID: 17237048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. refineD: improved protein structure refinement using machine learning based restrained relaxation.
    Bhattacharya D
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Sep; 35(18):3320-3328. PubMed ID: 30759180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A knowledge-based orientation potential for transcription factor-DNA docking.
    Takeda T; Corona RI; Guo JT
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Feb; 29(3):322-30. PubMed ID: 23220572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. CLUB-MARTINI: Selecting Favourable Interactions amongst Available Candidates, a Coarse-Grained Simulation Approach to Scoring Docking Decoys.
    Hou Q; Lensink MF; Heringa J; Feenstra KA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155251. PubMed ID: 27166787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Specificity and affinity quantification of protein-protein interactions.
    Yan Z; Guo L; Hu L; Wang J
    Bioinformatics; 2013 May; 29(9):1127-33. PubMed ID: 23476023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An Overview of Scoring Functions Used for Protein-Ligand Interactions in Molecular Docking.
    Li J; Fu A; Zhang L
    Interdiscip Sci; 2019 Jun; 11(2):320-328. PubMed ID: 30877639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. GradDock: rapid simulation and tailored ranking functions for peptide-MHC Class I docking.
    Kyeong HH; Choi Y; Kim HS
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Feb; 34(3):469-476. PubMed ID: 28968726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. PREDDIMER: a web server for prediction of transmembrane helical dimers.
    Polyansky AA; Chugunov AO; Volynsky PE; Krylov NA; Nolde DE; Efremov RG
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Mar; 30(6):889-90. PubMed ID: 24202542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. SOFTDOCK application to protein-protein interaction benchmark and CAPRI.
    Li N; Sun Z; Jiang F
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):801-8. PubMed ID: 17803216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. KORP: knowledge-based 6D potential for fast protein and loop modeling.
    López-Blanco JR; Chacón P
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Sep; 35(17):3013-3019. PubMed ID: 30649193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Sense and simplicity in HADDOCK scoring: Lessons from CASP-CAPRI round 1.
    Vangone A; Rodrigues JP; Xue LC; van Zundert GC; Geng C; Kurkcuoglu Z; Nellen M; Narasimhan S; Karaca E; van Dijk M; Melquiond AS; Visscher KM; Trellet M; Kastritis PL; Bonvin AM
    Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):417-423. PubMed ID: 27802573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Investigating the importance of Delaunay-based definition of atomic interactions in scoring of protein-protein docking results.
    Jafari R; Sadeghi M; Mirzaie M
    J Mol Graph Model; 2016 May; 66():108-14. PubMed ID: 27060891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. QAcon: single model quality assessment using protein structural and contact information with machine learning techniques.
    Cao R; Adhikari B; Bhattacharya D; Sun M; Hou J; Cheng J
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(4):586-588. PubMed ID: 28035027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. ProCaff: protein-carbohydrate complex binding affinity database.
    Siva Shanmugam NR; Jino Blessy J; Veluraja K; Michael Gromiha M
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jun; 36(11):3615-3617. PubMed ID: 32119071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Protein-ensemble-RNA docking by efficient consideration of protein flexibility through homology models.
    He J; Tao H; Huang SY
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 35(23):4994-5002. PubMed ID: 31086984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A systematic analysis of scoring functions in rigid-body protein docking: The delicate balance between the predictive rate improvement and the risk of overtraining.
    Barradas-Bautista D; Moal IH; Fernández-Recio J
    Proteins; 2017 Jul; 85(7):1287-1297. PubMed ID: 28342242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Integrating Bonded and Nonbonded Potentials in the Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein Structure Prediction.
    Wang X; Huang SY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):3080-3090. PubMed ID: 31045366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.