These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32246820)

  • 61. MDockPeP: An ab-initio protein-peptide docking server.
    Xu X; Yan C; Zou X
    J Comput Chem; 2018 Oct; 39(28):2409-2413. PubMed ID: 30368849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Learning from the ligand: using ligand-based features to improve binding affinity prediction.
    Boyles F; Deane CM; Morris GM
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Feb; 36(3):758-764. PubMed ID: 31598630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Combination of scoring functions improves discrimination in protein-protein docking.
    Murphy J; Gatchell DW; Prasad JC; Vajda S
    Proteins; 2003 Dec; 53(4):840-54. PubMed ID: 14635126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. CCharPPI web server: computational characterization of protein-protein interactions from structure.
    Moal IH; Jiménez-García B; Fernández-Recio J
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jan; 31(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 25183488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. BiGGER: a new (soft) docking algorithm for predicting protein interactions.
    Palma PN; Krippahl L; Wampler JE; Moura JJ
    Proteins; 2000 Jun; 39(4):372-84. PubMed ID: 10813819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. HPEPDOCK: a web server for blind peptide-protein docking based on a hierarchical algorithm.
    Zhou P; Jin B; Li H; Huang SY
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jul; 46(W1):W443-W450. PubMed ID: 29746661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Pushing the accuracy limit of shape complementarity for protein-protein docking.
    Yan Y; Huang SY
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 25):696. PubMed ID: 31874620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Finding correct protein-protein docking models using ProQDock.
    Basu S; Wallner B
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Jun; 32(12):i262-i270. PubMed ID: 27307625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Detecting the native ligand orientation by interfacial rigidity: SiteInterlock.
    Raschka S; Bemister-Buffington J; Kuhn LA
    Proteins; 2016 Dec; 84(12):1888-1901. PubMed ID: 27699847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Predicting protein complex geometries with linear scoring functions.
    Demir-Kavuk O; Krull F; Chae MH; Knapp EW
    Genome Inform; 2010; 24():21-30. PubMed ID: 22081586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. UniCon3D: de novo protein structure prediction using united-residue conformational search via stepwise, probabilistic sampling.
    Bhattacharya D; Cao R; Cheng J
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 32(18):2791-9. PubMed ID: 27259540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Random Forest Refinement of the KECSA2 Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein Decoy Detection.
    Pei J; Zheng Z; Merz KM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 May; 59(5):1919-1929. PubMed ID: 30726079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Introducing a Clustering Step in a Consensus Approach for the Scoring of Protein-Protein Docking Models.
    Chermak E; De Donato R; Lensink MF; Petta A; Serra L; Scarano V; Cavallo L; Oliva R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166460. PubMed ID: 27846259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Expanding the frontiers of protein-protein modeling: from docking and scoring to binding affinity predictions and other challenges.
    Pallara C; Jiménez-García B; Pérez-Cano L; Romero-Durana M; Solernou A; Grosdidier S; Pons C; Moal IH; Fernandez-Recio J
    Proteins; 2013 Dec; 81(12):2192-200. PubMed ID: 23934865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Recent Advances in Protein-Protein Docking.
    Zhang Q; Feng T; Xu L; Sun H; Pan P; Li Y; Li D; Hou T
    Curr Drug Targets; 2016; 17(14):1586-1594. PubMed ID: 26758670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Smooth orientation-dependent scoring function for coarse-grained protein quality assessment.
    Karasikov M; Pagès G; Grudinin S
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Aug; 35(16):2801-2808. PubMed ID: 30590384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Challenges and opportunities of automated protein-protein docking: HDOCK server vs human predictions in CAPRI Rounds 38-46.
    Yan Y; He J; Feng Y; Lin P; Tao H; Huang SY
    Proteins; 2020 Aug; 88(8):1055-1069. PubMed ID: 31994779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. LigRMSD: a web server for automatic structure matching and RMSD calculations among identical and similar compounds in protein-ligand docking.
    Velázquez-Libera JL; Durán-Verdugo F; Valdés-Jiménez A; Núñez-Vivanco G; Caballero J
    Bioinformatics; 2020 May; 36(9):2912-2914. PubMed ID: 31926012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Ranking multiple docking solutions based on the conservation of inter-residue contacts.
    Oliva R; Vangone A; Cavallo L
    Proteins; 2013 Sep; 81(9):1571-84. PubMed ID: 23609916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.