These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32247770)
1. Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour. Abalos E; Chamillard M; Díaz V; Pasquale J; Souza JP Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Aug; 67():19-32. PubMed ID: 32247770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Duration of spontaneous labour in 'low-risk' women with 'normal' perinatal outcomes: A systematic review. Abalos E; Oladapo OT; Chamillard M; Díaz V; Pasquale J; Bonet M; Souza JP; Gülmezoglu AM Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Apr; 223():123-132. PubMed ID: 29518643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour: A prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries. Oladapo OT; Souza JP; Fawole B; Mugerwa K; Perdoná G; Alves D; Souza H; Reis R; Oliveira-Ciabati L; Maiorano A; Akintan A; Alu FE; Oyeneyin L; Adebayo A; Byamugisha J; Nakalembe M; Idris HA; Okike O; Althabe F; Hundley V; Donnay F; Pattinson R; Sanghvi HC; Jardine JE; Tunçalp Ö; Vogel JP; Stanton ME; Bohren M; Zhang J; Lavender T; Liljestrand J; Ten Hoope-Bender P; Mathai M; Bahl R; Gülmezoglu AM PLoS Med; 2018 Jan; 15(1):e1002492. PubMed ID: 29338000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical dilatation patterns of 'low-risk' women with spontaneous labour and normal perinatal outcomes: a systematic review. Oladapo OT; Diaz V; Bonet M; Abalos E; Thwin SS; Souza H; Perdoná G; Souza JP; Gülmezoglu AM BJOG; 2018 Jul; 125(8):944-954. PubMed ID: 28892266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical dilatation over time is a poor predictor of severe adverse birth outcomes: a diagnostic accuracy study. Souza JP; Oladapo OT; Fawole B; Mugerwa K; Reis R; Barbosa-Junior F; Oliveira-Ciabati L; Alves D; Gülmezoglu AM BJOG; 2018 Jul; 125(8):991-1000. PubMed ID: 29498187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of partogram in high risk pregnancies: an experience at a tertiary centre. Rani J; Sharma D; Sehgal A Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jan; 291(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 25096954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of the partograph alert and action lines to predict adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review. Bonet M; Oladapo OT; Souza JP; Gülmezoglu AM BJOG; 2019 Dec; 126(13):1524-1533. PubMed ID: 31334912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing Different Partograph Designs for Use in Standard Labor Care: A Pilot Randomized Trial. Lee NJ; Neal J; Lowe NK; Kildea SV Matern Child Health J; 2018 Mar; 22(3):355-363. PubMed ID: 28936715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Labour Progression Study (LaPS): Duration of labour following Zhang's guideline and the WHO partograph - A cluster randomised trial. Dalbye R; Blix E; Frøslie KF; Zhang J; Eggebø TM; Olsen IC; Rozsa D; Øian P; Bernitz S Midwifery; 2020 Feb; 81():102578. PubMed ID: 31783231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relationship between cervical dilatation at initial presentation in labour and subsequent intervention. Holmes P; Oppenheimer LW; Wen SW BJOG; 2001 Nov; 108(11):1120-4. PubMed ID: 11762649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical Dilatation Curves of Spontaneous Deliveries in Pregnant Japanese Females. Inde Y; Nakai A; Sekiguchi A; Hayashi M; Takeshita T Int J Med Sci; 2018; 15(6):549-556. PubMed ID: 29725244 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating progress of labor in nulliparas and multiparas using the modified WHO partograph. Orji E Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Sep; 102(3):249-52. PubMed ID: 18603248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of partogram use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term. Lavender T; Hart A; Smyth RM Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Oct; (4):CD005461. PubMed ID: 18843690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revising the primigravid partogram: does it make any difference? van Bogaert LJ Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 May; 279(5):643-7. PubMed ID: 18777032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Impact of use of Modified WHO Partograph on Labour Progress and Delivery: Outcome among Spontaneous and Induced Labour in Nulliparous Women at Term. Fatema K; Das TR; Pervin HH; Zaman MA Mymensingh Med J; 2024 Jan; 33(1):198-205. PubMed ID: 38163793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The frequency of intrapartum caesarean section use with the WHO partograph versus Zhang's guideline in the Labour Progression Study (LaPS): a multicentre, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Bernitz S; Dalbye R; Zhang J; Eggebø TM; Frøslie KF; Olsen IC; Blix E; Øian P Lancet; 2019 Jan; 393(10169):340-348. PubMed ID: 30581039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Duration of labour with spontaneous onset. Bergsjø P; Bakketeig L; Eikhom SN Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1979; 58(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 452865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Labour duration and timing of interventions in women planning vaginal birth after caesarean section. Grylka-Baeschlin S; Petersen A; Karch A; Gross MM Midwifery; 2016 Mar; 34():221-229. PubMed ID: 26681573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of parity on uterine activity in labour. Arulkumaran S; Gibb DM; Lun KC; Heng SH; Ratnam SS Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Sep; 91(9):843-8. PubMed ID: 6477844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of partogram in vaginal birth after caesarean section. Omole-Ohonsi A; Muhammad Z; Iliyasu Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Apr; 27(3):264-6. PubMed ID: 17464807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]