181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32248328)
1. Assessing parameter uncertainty in small-n pharmacometric analyses: value of the log-likelihood profiling-based sampling importance resampling (LLP-SIR) technique.
Broeker A; Wicha SG
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2020 Jun; 47(3):219-228. PubMed ID: 32248328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving the estimation of parameter uncertainty distributions in nonlinear mixed effects models using sampling importance resampling.
Dosne AG; Bergstrand M; Harling K; Karlsson MO
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Dec; 43(6):583-596. PubMed ID: 27730482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An automated sampling importance resampling procedure for estimating parameter uncertainty.
Dosne AG; Bergstrand M; Karlsson MO
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2017 Dec; 44(6):509-520. PubMed ID: 28887735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of uncertainty parameters estimated by different population PK software and methods.
Dartois C; Lemenuel-Diot A; Laveille C; Tranchand B; Tod M; Girard P
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2007 Jun; 34(3):289-311. PubMed ID: 17216368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. dOFV distributions: a new diagnostic for the adequacy of parameter uncertainty in nonlinear mixed-effects models applied to the bootstrap.
Dosne AG; Niebecker R; Karlsson MO
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Dec; 43(6):597-608. PubMed ID: 27730481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of bootstrap approaches for estimating uncertainty of parameters in linear mixed-effects models.
Thai HT; Mentré F; Holford NH; Veyrat-Follet C; Comets E
Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):129-40. PubMed ID: 23457061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two bootstrapping routines for obtaining imprecision estimates for nonparametric parameter distributions in nonlinear mixed effects models.
Baverel PG; Savic RM; Karlsson MO
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2011 Feb; 38(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 21076858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative assessment of parameter estimation methods in the presence of overdispersion: a simulation study.
Roosa K; Luo R; Chowell G
Math Biosci Eng; 2019 May; 16(5):4299-4313. PubMed ID: 31499663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Uncertainty Computation at Finite Distance in Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models-a New Method Based on Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm.
Guhl M; Bertrand J; Fayette L; Mercier F; Comets E
AAPS J; 2024 Apr; 26(3):53. PubMed ID: 38722435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conditional Non-parametric Bootstrap for Non-linear Mixed Effect Models.
Comets E; Rodrigues C; Jullien V; Ursino M
Pharm Res; 2021 Jun; 38(6):1057-1066. PubMed ID: 34075519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Methods for Model Calibration under High Uncertainty: Modeling Cholera in Bangladesh.
Ryckman T; Luby S; Owens DK; Bendavid E; Goldhaber-Fiebert JD
Med Decis Making; 2020 Jul; 40(5):693-709. PubMed ID: 32639859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of bootstrap methods for estimating uncertainty of parameters in nonlinear mixed-effects models: a simulation study in population pharmacokinetics.
Thai HT; Mentré F; Holford NH; Veyrat-Follet C; Comets E
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2014 Feb; 41(1):15-33. PubMed ID: 24317870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combining Nordtest method and bootstrap resampling for measurement uncertainty estimation of hematology analytes in a medical laboratory.
Cui M; Xu L; Wang H; Ju S; Xu S; Jing R
Clin Biochem; 2017 Dec; 50(18):1067-1072. PubMed ID: 28928006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian calibration of process-based forest models: bridging the gap between models and data.
Van Oijen M; Rougier J; Smith R
Tree Physiol; 2005 Jul; 25(7):915-27. PubMed ID: 15870058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Smoothed Bootstrap Aggregation for Assessing Selection Pressure at Amino Acid Sites.
Mingrone J; Susko E; Bielawski J
Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Nov; 33(11):2976-2989. PubMed ID: 27486222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Confidence interval comparison: Precision of maximum likelihood estimates in LLOQ affected data.
Bülow T; Hilgers RD; Heussen N
PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293640. PubMed ID: 37917602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nonlinear systems identification by combining regression with bootstrap resampling.
Kuramae H; Hirata Y; Bruchovsky N; Aihara K; Suzuki H
Chaos; 2011 Dec; 21(4):043121. PubMed ID: 22225358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of bootstrap resampling performance for PET data.
Markiewicz PJ; Reader AJ; Matthews JC
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):279-99. PubMed ID: 25490178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
