These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32248796)
1. Intraocular pressure changes and corneal biomechanics after hyperopic small-incision lenticule extraction. Fu D; Li M; Knorz MC; Wei S; Shang J; Zhou X BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 20(1):129. PubMed ID: 32248796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Shen Y; Su X; Liu X; Miao H; Fang X; Zhou X BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):205. PubMed ID: 27863469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraocular Pressure Changes and Relationship With Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE and FS-LASIK. Li H; Wang Y; Dou R; Wei P; Zhang J; Zhao W; Li L Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 57(10):4180-6. PubMed ID: 27548888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK. Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative analysis of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure with corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology versus conventional noncontact intraocular pressure. Ma J; Wang Y; Hao W; Jhanji V Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 40(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 31432352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of a new correction algorithm for dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer tonometry before and after laser in situ keratomileusis and small-incision lenticule extraction. Chen KJ; Joda A; Vinciguerra R; Eliasy A; Sefat SMM; Kook D; Geraghty B; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 May; 44(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 29685776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Corvis ST Tonometer for Measuring Postoperative IOP in LASIK Patients. Hong J; Yu Z; Jiang C; Zhou X; Liu Z; Sun X; Xu J Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 25871871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis. Matsuura M; Murata H; Fujino Y; Yanagisawa M; Nakao Y; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 104(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 31362932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Analysis of intraocular pressure measurement and the influencing factors after small incision lenticule extraction]. Li H; Wang Y; Dou R; Wang L; Wei P; Zhao W; Li L Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jan; 52(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 26899217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure using Corvis ST and comparison of the Corvis ST, noncontact tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma. Nakao Y; Kiuchi Y; Okumichi H PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238395. PubMed ID: 32966284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Shin J; Kim TW; Park SJ; Yoon M; Lee JW J Glaucoma; 2015 Mar; 24(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 23807345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in corneal biomechanics during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). Cao K; Liu L; Yu T; Chen F; Bai J; Liu T Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Apr; 35(3):599-609. PubMed ID: 31463819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraocular Pressure Before and After Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Prospective Comparison of Corvis ST and Ocular Response Analyzer. Salouti R; Azimi A; Meshksar A; Takapouy R; Ghoreyshi M; Salouti K; Razeghinejad R; Nowroozzadeh MH J Glaucoma; 2024 Oct; 33(10):780-784. PubMed ID: 38767500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Trabeculectomy and the Impact on Intraocular Pressure Measurement. Pillunat KR; Spoerl E; Terai N; Pillunat LE J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar; 26(3):278-282. PubMed ID: 27977478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early elastic and viscoelastic corneal biomechanical changes after photorefractive keratectomy and small incision lenticule extraction. Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Yekta AA; Maddah N; Roberts CJ; Savardashtaki M Int Ophthalmol; 2024 Jul; 44(1):302. PubMed ID: 38954134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of 4 tonometers in measuring IOP after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK, SMILE, and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy. Chen S; Lopes BT; Huang W; Zheng X; Wang J; Zhu R; Vinciguerra R; Li Y; Wang Q; Li H; Bao F; Elsheikh A J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Jul; 46(7):967-974. PubMed ID: 32271270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New parameters for evaluating corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure after small-incision lenticule extraction by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry. Fernández J; Rodríguez-Vallejo M; Martínez J; Tauste A; Salvestrini P; Piñero DP J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Jun; 43(6):803-811. PubMed ID: 28732615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Corneal Biomechanical Properties after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Surgery on Thin Cornea. Fu D; Zhao Y; Zhou X Curr Eye Res; 2021 Feb; 46(2):168-173. PubMed ID: 32643431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Real-Time Intraocular Pressure Measurements in the Vitreous Chamber of Rabbit Eyes During Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE). Cheng W; Liu L; Yu S; Jing Y; Zuo T; Cui T; Zhang H; Ma J; Wei P; Hao W; Lap-Ki Ng A; Pak-Man Cheng G; Chi-Pang Woo V; Chiu K; Wang Y Curr Eye Res; 2018 Oct; 43(10):1260-1266. PubMed ID: 29874938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]