143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32250125)
1. How a Discrepancy Between Centric Relation and Maximum Intercuspation Alters Cephalometric and Condylar Measurements.
Parreiras Ferreira R; Isaias Seraidarian P; Santos Silveira G; Campolina Rebello Horta M; Martin Palomo J; Andrade I
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2020 Apr; 41(4):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 32250125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The centric relation-maximum intercuspation discrepancy in adult angle's class II pretreatment patients].
Deng X; Wan Z; He SS; Wamalwa P; Chen S; Zhang ZY
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 29(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 21427900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dentofacial characteristics in orthodontic patients with centric relation-maximum intercuspation discrepancy.
Lim WH; Choi B; Lee JY; Ahn SJ
Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):939-45. PubMed ID: 24673658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative analysis between mandibular positions in centric relation and maximum intercuspation by cone beam computed tomography (CONE-BEAM).
Ferreira Ade F; Henriques JC; Almeida GA; Machado AR; Machado NA; Fernandes Neto AJ
J Appl Oral Sci; 2009; 17 Suppl(spe):27-34. PubMed ID: 21499652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cone-beam tomography assessment of condylar position discrepancy between centric relation and maximal intercuspation.
Henriques JC; Fernandes Neto AJ; Almeida Gde A; Machado NA; Lelis ER
Braz Oral Res; 2012; 26(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 22344335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional analysis of models articulated in the seated condylar position from a deprogrammed asymptomatic population: a prospective study. Part 1.
Cordray FE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):619-30. PubMed ID: 16679202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The difference in condylar position between centric relation and centric occlusion in pretreatment Japanese orthodontic patients.
Hidaka O; Adachi S; Takada K
Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 12169028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility of the centric relation bite registration technique.
Wood DP; Elliott RW
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 8060017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A three-dimensional comparison of condylar position changes between centric relation and centric occlusion using the mandibular position indicator.
Utt TW; Meyers CE; Wierzba TF; Hondrum SO
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Mar; 107(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 7879763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The CR-CO discrepancy and its effect on cephalometric measurements.
Shildkraut M; Wood DP; Hunter WS
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(5):333-42. PubMed ID: 7794320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Role of Maxillofacial Structure on Condylar Displacement in Maximum Intercuspation and Centric Relation.
Radej I; Szarmach I
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():1439203. PubMed ID: 35097107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cephalometric analysis: comparisons between maximum intercuspation and centric relation.
Williamson EH; Caves SA; Edenfield RJ; Morse PK
Am J Orthod; 1978 Dec; 74(6):672-7. PubMed ID: 281875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Analysis of mandibular position of patients with angles Class I and Class II, division 1 malocclusion].
He H; Fu M
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Sep; 36(5):367-70. PubMed ID: 11769653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of the mandibular position in malocclusion patients.
He H; Fu M
Chin J Dent Res; 2000 May; 3(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 11314339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The relationship between centric relation-maximum intercuspation disharmony and temporomandibular dysfunction in class II patients].
Wang YJ; Chen S; Shi AT; Wu Y; Deng X
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2013 Mar; 44(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 23745262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of the anterior functional device in recording the centric relations of patients with posterior tooth loss.
Ballastreire MC; Carmo GG; Fantini SM
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):560-5. PubMed ID: 26119015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cone-beam tomography assessment of the condylar position in asymptomatic and symptomatic young individuals.
Lelis ÉR; Guimarães Henriques JC; Tavares M; de Mendonça MR; Fernandes Neto AJ; Almeida Gde A
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):420-5. PubMed ID: 26047805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Condylar axis position, as determined by the occlusion and measured by the CPI instrument, and signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction.
Crawford SD
Angle Orthod; 1999 Apr; 69(2):103-15; discussion 115-6. PubMed ID: 10227550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of optimal condylar position in the coronal and axial planes with limited cone-beam computed tomography.
Ikeda K; Kawamura A; Ikeda R
J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 20(6):432-8. PubMed ID: 21689204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the condylar position in younger and older adults with or without temporomandibular symptoms by using cone beam computed tomography.
Kattiney de Oliveira L; Fernandes Neto AJ; Moraes Mundim Prado I; Guimarães Henriques JC; Beom Kim K; de Araújo Almeida G
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):445-452. PubMed ID: 33317831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
