These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32250145)
1. Debate around leadership in the Stanford Prison Experiment: Reply to Zimbardo and Haney (2020) and Chan et al. (2020). Reicher SD; Van Bavel JJ; Haslam SA Am Psychol; 2020 Apr; 75(3):406-407. PubMed ID: 32250145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rethinking the nature of cruelty: The role of identity leadership in the Stanford Prison Experiment. Haslam SA; Reicher SD; Van Bavel JJ Am Psychol; 2019 Oct; 74(7):809-822. PubMed ID: 31380665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identity leadership is manifested via integrative complexity: Comment on Haslam et al. (2019). Chan L; Zubrod A; Woodard SR; Conway LG Am Psychol; 2020 Apr; 75(3):403-405. PubMed ID: 32250144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Continuing to acknowledge the power of dehumanizing environments: Comment on Haslam et al. (2019) and Le Texier (2019). Zimbardo PG; Haney C Am Psychol; 2020 Apr; 75(3):400-402. PubMed ID: 32250143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment: could participant self-selection have led to the cruelty? Carnahan T; McFarland S Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 May; 33(5):603-14. PubMed ID: 17440210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prison break: Karl Menninger's The Crime of Punishment and its reception in U.S. psychology. Devonis DC; Triggs J Hist Psychol; 2017 Feb; 20(1):92-121. PubMed ID: 27918186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Debunking the Stanford Prison Experiment. Le Texier T Am Psychol; 2019 Oct; 74(7):823-839. PubMed ID: 31380664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Philip G. Zimbardo on his career and the Stanford Prison Experiment's 40th anniversary. Drury S; Hutchens SA; Shuttlesworth DE; White CL Hist Psychol; 2012 May; 15(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 22849005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment, again: Examining demand characteristics in the guard orientation. Bartels J J Soc Psychol; 2019; 159(6):780-790. PubMed ID: 30961456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When prisoners take over the prison: a social psychology of resistance. Haslam SA; Reicher SD Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2012 May; 16(2):154-79. PubMed ID: 21885855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Similarities and differences: Comment on Chan et al. (2021). Jones PM; Mitchell CJ; Wills AJ; Spicer SG J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2021 Apr; 47(2):216-217. PubMed ID: 34264726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The past and future of U.S. prison policy. Twenty-five years after the Stanford prison experiment. Haney C; Zimbardo P Am Psychol; 1998 Jul; 53(7):709-27. PubMed ID: 9699456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: a meta-analysis of contextual moderators. Paustian-Underdahl SC; Walker LS; Woehr DJ J Appl Psychol; 2014 Nov; 99(6):1129-45. PubMed ID: 24773399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. From microscopic to macroscopic perspectives and back: The study of leadership and health/well-being. Inceoglu I; Arnold KA; Leroy H; Lang JWB; Stephan U J Occup Health Psychol; 2021 Dec; 26(6):459-468. PubMed ID: 34990165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Energizing leaders via self-reflection: A within-person field experiment. Lanaj K; Foulk TA; Erez A J Appl Psychol; 2019 Jan; 104(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 30321029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Palliative and end-of-life care in prisons: a content analysis of the literature. Maschi T; Marmo S; Han J Int J Prison Health; 2014; 10(3):172-97. PubMed ID: 25764177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The "space" of history: A response to Graiver (2020), Rossano (2020), and Smail (2020). Henley TB Hist Psychol; 2020 Aug; 23(3):230-231. PubMed ID: 32940505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Guidelines for substitution treatments in prison populations]. Michel L; Maguet O Encephale; 2005; 31(1 Pt 1):92-7. PubMed ID: 15971645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Making the leader identity salient can be demotivating. Savani K; Zou X J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Jun; 25(2):245-255. PubMed ID: 30024210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Despotism, democracy, and the evolutionary dynamics of leadership and followership. Van Vugt M Am Psychol; 2009 Jan; 64(1):discussion 54-6. PubMed ID: 19209974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]