These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32250165)

  • 41. Models, algorithms and programs for phylogeny reconciliation.
    Doyon JP; Ranwez V; Daubin V; Berry V
    Brief Bioinform; 2011 Sep; 12(5):392-400. PubMed ID: 21949266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. New algorithms for structure informed genome rearrangement.
    Ozeri E; Zehavi M; Ziv-Ukelson M
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2023 Dec; 18(1):17. PubMed ID: 38037088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Bayesian gene/species tree reconciliation and orthology analysis using MCMC.
    Arvestad L; Berglund AC; Lagergren J; Sennblad B
    Bioinformatics; 2003; 19 Suppl 1():i7-15. PubMed ID: 12855432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Exploring the space of gene/species reconciliations with transfers.
    Chan YB; Ranwez V; Scornavacca C
    J Math Biol; 2015 Nov; 71(5):1179-209. PubMed ID: 25502987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Phylogenetic Flexibility via Hall-Type Inequalities and Submodularity.
    Huber KT; Moulton V; Steel M
    Bull Math Biol; 2019 Feb; 81(2):598-617. PubMed ID: 29589255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. On the Number of Non-equivalent Ancestral Configurations for Matching Gene Trees and Species Trees.
    Disanto F; Rosenberg NA
    Bull Math Biol; 2019 Feb; 81(2):384-407. PubMed ID: 28913585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Efficient genome-scale phylogenetic analysis under the duplication-loss and deep coalescence cost models.
    Bansal MS; Burleigh JG; Eulenstein O
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S42. PubMed ID: 20122216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Enumeration of compact coalescent histories for matching gene trees and species trees.
    Disanto F; Rosenberg NA
    J Math Biol; 2019 Jan; 78(1-2):155-188. PubMed ID: 30116881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Algorithms for genome-scale phylogenetics using gene tree parsimony.
    Bansal MS; Eulenstein O
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(4):939-56. PubMed ID: 24334388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. ecceTERA: comprehensive gene tree-species tree reconciliation using parsimony.
    Jacox E; Chauve C; Szöllősi GJ; Ponty Y; Scornavacca C
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Jul; 32(13):2056-8. PubMed ID: 27153713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. TreeKO: a duplication-aware algorithm for the comparison of phylogenetic trees.
    Marcet-Houben M; Gabaldón T
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 May; 39(10):e66. PubMed ID: 21335609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. On Determining if Tree-based Networks Contain Fixed Trees.
    Anaya M; Anipchenko-Ulaj O; Ashfaq A; Chiu J; Kaiser M; Ohsawa MS; Owen M; Pavlechko E; St John K; Suleria S; Thompson K; Yap C
    Bull Math Biol; 2016 May; 78(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 27125655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Gene tree correction for reconciliation and species tree inference.
    Swenson KM; Doroftei A; El-Mabrouk N
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2012 Nov; 7(1):31. PubMed ID: 23167951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Most parsimonious reconciliation in the presence of gene duplication, loss, and deep coalescence using labeled coalescent trees.
    Wu YC; Rasmussen MD; Bansal MS; Kellis M
    Genome Res; 2014 Mar; 24(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 24310000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Coalescent Histories for Lodgepole Species Trees.
    Disanto F; Rosenberg NA
    J Comput Biol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):918-29. PubMed ID: 25973633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Simultaneous identification of duplications, losses, and lateral gene transfers.
    Chen ZZ; Deng F; Wang L
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(5):1515-28. PubMed ID: 22641711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Reconstructing a SuperGeneTree minimizing reconciliation.
    Lafond M; Ouangraoua A; El-Mabrouk N
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015; 16 Suppl 14(Suppl 14):S4. PubMed ID: 26451911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of Incomplete Lineage Sorting On Tree-Reconciliation-Based Inference of Gene Duplication.
    Zheng Y; Zhang L
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2014; 11(3):477-85. PubMed ID: 26356016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Multiple Optimal Reconciliations Under the Duplication-Loss-Coalescence Model.
    Du H; Ong YS; Knittel M; Mawhorter R; Liu N; Gross G; Tojo R; Libeskind-Hadas R; Wu YC
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2021; 18(6):2144-2156. PubMed ID: 31199267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Exact solutions for species tree inference from discordant gene trees.
    Chang WC; Górecki P; Eulenstein O
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2013 Oct; 11(5):1342005. PubMed ID: 24131054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.