174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32250642)
1. Evaluation of a low-dose protocol for cone beam computed tomography of the temporomandibular joint.
Iskanderani D; Nilsson M; Alstergren P; Shi XQ; Hellen-Halme K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Sep; 49(6):20190495. PubMed ID: 32250642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement accuracy of temporomandibular joint space in Promax 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images.
Zhang ZL; Cheng JG; Li G; Zhang JZ; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Jul; 114(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 22727100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of CBCT radiation doses with conventional radiographs in TMJ imaging using Monte Carlo simulations.
Deniz Y; Eren H; Sessiz R; Coşan Ata G
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2024 Mar; 63(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 38182962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of cone beam computed tomography for assessment of the temporomandibular joints.
Barghan S; Tetradis S; Mallya S
Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():109-18. PubMed ID: 22376103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visibility of anatomical landmarks in the region of the mandibular third molar, a comparison between a low-dose and default protocol of CBCT.
Cederhag J; Iskanderani D; Alstergren P; Shi XQ; Hellén-Halme K
Acta Odontol Scand; 2023 Aug; 81(6):449-455. PubMed ID: 36748228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Small field of view cone beam CT temporomandibular joint imaging dosimetry.
Lukat TD; Wong JC; Lam EW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130082. PubMed ID: 24048693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do cone-beam computed tomography low-dose protocols affect the evaluation of the temporomandibular joint?
de Oliveira Reis L; Gaêta-Araujo H; Rosado LPL; Mouzinho-Machado S; Oliveira-Santos C; Freitas DQ; Correr-Sobrinho L
J Oral Rehabil; 2023 Jan; 50(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 36271700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image quality assessment of low-dose protocols in cone beam computed tomography of the anterior maxilla.
Ihlis RL; Kadesjö N; Tsilingaridis G; Benchimol D; Shi XQ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2022 Apr; 133(4):483-491. PubMed ID: 34742681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of accuracy of detection of surface osseous changes in the temporomandibular joint using multidetector CT and cone beam CT.
Zain-Alabdeen EH; Alsadhan RI
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Mar; 41(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 22378752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of subjective image analysis and effective dose between low-dose cone-beam computed tomography machines.
Charuakkra A; Mahasantipiya P; Lehtinen A; Koivisto J; Järnstedt J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Jan; 52(2):20220176. PubMed ID: 36168973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection accuracy of condylar bony defects in Promax 3D cone beam CT images scanned with different protocols.
Zhang ZL; Cheng JG; Li G; Shi XQ; Zhang JZ; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(5):20120241. PubMed ID: 23420852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cone-beam computed tomography to detect erosions of the temporomandibular joint: Effect of field of view and voxel size on diagnostic efficacy and effective dose.
Librizzi ZT; Tadinada AS; Valiyaparambil JV; Lurie AG; Mallya SM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jul; 140(1):e25-30. PubMed ID: 21724068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the Radiation Dose from Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Multidetector Computed Tomography in Examinations of the Hand.
Neubauer J; Neubauer C; Gerstmair A; Krauss T; Reising K; Zajonc H; Kotter E; Langer M; Fiebich M; Voigt J
Rofo; 2016 May; 188(5):488-93. PubMed ID: 26981913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cone-beam computed tomography with ultra-low dose protocols for pre-implant radiographic assessment: An in vitro study.
Liljeholm R; Kadesjö N; Benchimol D; Hellén-Halme K; Shi XQ
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(3):351-359. PubMed ID: 28944361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic efficacy of CBCT, MRI, and CBCT-MRI fused images in distinguishing articular disc calcification from loose body of temporomandibular joint.
Wang YH; Li G; Ma RH; Zhao YP; Zhang H; Meng JH; Mu CC; Sun CK; Ma XC
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Apr; 25(4):1907-1914. PubMed ID: 32785850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of different low-dose multidetector CT and cone beam CT protocols in maxillary sinus imaging: part I-an in vitro study.
Almashraqi AA; Ahmed EA; Mohamed NS; Barngkgei IH; Elsherbini NA; Halboub ES
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Aug; 46(6):20160323. PubMed ID: 28266870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mobile C-arm cone-beam CT for guidance of spine surgery: image quality, radiation dose, and integration with interventional guidance.
Schafer S; Nithiananthan S; Mirota DJ; Uneri A; Stayman JW; Zbijewski W; Schmidgunst C; Kleinszig G; Khanna AJ; Siewerdsena JH
Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4563-74. PubMed ID: 21928628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of diagnostic cone-beam computed tomography protocols on image quality, patient dose, and lesion detection.
Paul J; Chacko A; Saccomandi P; Vogl TJ; Nour-Eldin NA
Phys Med; 2016 Dec; 32(12):1575-1583. PubMed ID: 27894729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Web-based educational programme for temporomandibular joint assessment with cone-beam computed tomography.
Iskanderani D; Alstergren P; Ekberg EC; Shi XQ; Hellén-Halme K
J Oral Rehabil; 2020 Nov; 47(11):1330-1336. PubMed ID: 32757414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cone-beam CT versus multi-slice CT systems for postoperative imaging of cochlear implantation--a phantom study on image quality and radiation exposure using human temporal bones.
Theunisse HJ; Joemai RM; Maal TJ; Geleijns J; Mylanus EA; Verbist BM
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Apr; 36(4):592-9. PubMed ID: 25420084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
